Organometallics 1997, 16, 4519-4521
4519
P r ep a r a tion of Ch ir a l-a t-Ir on -Su bstitu ted Allyl a n d Vin yl
Su lfon es. Su bsequ en t En ola te Gen er a tion a n d Ster eo-
a n d Regioselective Alk yla tion
Paren P. Patel and Mark E. Welker*,†
Department of Chemistry, Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7486,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109
Louise M. Liable-Sands and Arnold L. Rheingold
Department of Chemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716
Received May 30, 1997X
Summary: The (η5-cyclopentadienyl)Fe(CO)2 (Fp) anion
adds to allenic sulfone (CH2dCdCHSO2Ph) to generate
predominantly iron-substituted allyl or vinyl sulfones,
depending on the reaction conditions chosen. Following
a phosphine for CO ligand substitution, these allyl or
vinyl sulfones can be deprotonated to yield carbanions,
which can be alkylated regio- and stereoselectively.
These alkylation reactions are unusual for allyl sulfones
in that the ratio of R: γ alkylation changes dramatically
as the electrophile structure changes.
for CO substitution in solution lead only to the isolation
of η3-butadienyl complexes (4) rather than the desired
dienyl complex (5).
We have begun to pursue a strategy toward chiral-
at-iron-substituted dienes (5 and more highly substi-
tuted analogs thereof) that will ultimately rely on a
J ulia olefination.3 In this communication, we report the
preparation of chiral-at-iron-substituted allyl and vinyl
sulfones which will be required to pursue that strategy
as well as their subsequent deprotonation followed by
stereo- and regioselective alkylation.
Allenyl sulfones (9) have found widespread use in
organic synthesis as dienophiles and as diene precur-
sors.4 The central allene carbon in these sulfones is
highly electrophilic, and hence, they readily undergo
nucleophilic addition reactions. The simplest allenyl
phenylsulfone (9) is easily prepared from propargyl
chloride (6; Scheme 1).5 The Cp(CO)2Fe anion (1) was
added to 9 to generate the iron-substituted allylic and
vinyl sulfones (10 and 11) (35-45%).6 Isolated yields
of 10 and 11 are consistently in the 40% range for a
variety of reaction scales tried. We always recover a
For several years, we have been interested in explor-
ing how metal-centered chirality would affect the ster-
eochemical outcome of [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions.1
In conjunction with these interests, we want to prepare
racemic then ultimately optically active chiral-at-iron
1,3-dienyl complexes (5). We have reported that the
CpFe(CO)2 anion (Fp anion)2 (1) reacted with allenic
electrophiles (2) in a SN2′ fashion to generate Fp-
substituted 1,3-dienyl complexes (3). Thermal and
(3) J ulia, M.; Paris, J .-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 4833.
(4) Simpkins, N. S. Sulfones in Organic Synthesis; Pergamon:
Oxford, 1993; Chapter 2.
(5) (a) Herriott, A. W.; Picker, D. Synthesis 1975, 447. (b) Stirling,
C. J . M. J . Chem. Soc. C 1964, 5863. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Harmata, M.
A.; White, K. S. J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4031.
(6) Cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl anion (1) was prepared from
[CpFe(CO)2]2 (0.600 g, 1.69 mmol) in THF (100 mL) using the method
of Piper and Wilkinson.2 Allenic sulfone (9) (0.72 g, 4.00 mmol) was
dissolved in THF (100 mL) and cooled to -78 °C. Iron anion (1) was
added to 9 slowly using a double-ended needle, and the mixture was
allowed to stir 2 h at -78 °C. The temperature was permitted to rise
to -20 °C over several hours and then quenched by the addition of
NH4Cl (aq) (25 mL) followed by water (100 mL). The aqueous was
extracted with EtOAc (3 × 100 mL), and the combined extracts were
dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation, and
the product was chromatographed on alumina. Elution with hexane
yielded [CpFe(CO)2]2 (by TLC comparison to an authentic sample), and
elution with 9:1 hexane:EtOAc yielded 10:11 (1:3) (0.47 g, 1.31 mmol,
39%). Complexes 10 and 11 have surprisingly different solubility
characteristics, so this mixture of 10:11 could be triturated with 1:1
hexane:EtOAc to remove 10 and leave 11 behind as a yellow solid (350
mg). 1H NMR (C6D6): 8.11 (m, 2H), 6.99 (m, 3H), 6.82 (q, J ) 1.2 Hz,
1H), 3.79 (s, 5H), 2.66 (d, J ) 1.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (C6D6): 214.94,
145.32, 135.08, 131.94, 129.11, 128.94, 127.17, 85.85, 34.01. IR (KBr):
2018, 1964, 1299, 1136, 1082 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C16H14FeO4S: C,
53.65; H, 3.94. Found: C, 54.49; H, 4.31. LR FAB MS: 359 (25, M +
H+), 330 (15, M+ - CO), 302 (50, M+ - 2CO), 274 (25), 217 (100). HR
FAB MS calcd for C16H15FeO4S (M + H+): 359.0040. Found: 359.0050.
Complex 10 was also recovered as a yellow solid (100 mg) from the
liquid by adding hexane to induce precipitation. 1H NMR (C6D6): 7.70
(m, 2H), 6.96 (m, 3H), 6.03 (s, 1H), 5.47 (s, 1H), 4.40 (s, 5H), 3.87 (s,
2H). 13C NMR (C6D6): 216.56, 141.84, 139.32, 136.51, 132.82, 129.00,
photochemical attempts to do a phosphine or phosphite
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
welker@wfu.edu.
† Henry Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awardee (1994-99).
X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, September 15, 1997.
(1) (a) Smalley, T. L., J r.; Wright, M. W.; Garmon, S. A.; Welker,
M. E.; Rheingold, A. L. Organometallics 1993, 12, 998. (b) Stokes, H.
L.; Smalley, T. L.; Hunter, M. L.; Welker, M. E.; Rheingold, A. L. Inorg.
Chim. Acta 1994, 220, 305. (c) For an earlier report on iron dienyl
complexes prepared by a different route, see: Waterman, P. S.;
Belmonte, J . E.; Bauch, T. E.; Belmonte, P. A.; Giering, W. P. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1985, 294, 235.
128.20, 86.39, 74.53. IR (KBr): 2013, 1955, 1304, 1146, 1083 cm-1
.
Anal. Calcd for C16H14FeO4S: C, 53.65; H, 3.94. Found: C, 53.56; H,
4.00.
(2) Piper, T. S.; Wilkinson, G. J . Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1956, 3, 104.
S0276-7333(97)00448-2 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society