8
to imines with excellent results. Hoveyda, Snapper, and
In the presence of stoichiometric amount of N,N-disub-
stituted amino alcohols 2, we systematically examined the
effects of substituents bonded to the benzyl ring of the ligands
on the enantioselectivities by means of N-diphenylphos-
phinoyl benzalimine as a standard substrate. As can be seen
in Table 1, most of chiral N,N-disubstituted amino alcohols
their co-workers have also realized the catalytic asymmetric
diethylzinc addition to imines by means of chiral Zr
complexes.9 Many chiral amino alcohol ligands have been
developed for the diethylzinc addition to diphenylphos-
phinoylimines, but most of them are limited to compounds
containing a structurally rigid backbone. There is a trend in
previous reports that structurally constrained chiral â-amino
alcohols generally showed much higher enantioselectivities
than structurally flexible ones.5e-g However, structurally rigid
and restricted amino alcohols have inconveniences along with
their multistep synthesis5e,10 that make the process of
diethylzinc addition to imines to prepare the chiral amines
too expensive to compete with other families of chiral
ligands, especially when stoichiometric amounts were used.
Therefore the design and development of easily accessible
and economical chiral reagents are still a worthwhile project.
If the chiral reagents are cheap enough, the transformation
leading to chiral amines, even in the presence of stoichio-
metric amounts of such kinds of ligands, is also comparable
with the asymmetric catalytic process. In our previous work,
we have already presented the diethylzinc addition to
diphenylphosphinoylimines with up to 94% ee given by a
chiral ligand 1 derived from 1,2-diphenyl-2-aminoethanol
that has been made in large scale by a very cheap process.11
Herein, we would like to present our approach to a much
more easily available kind of ligand for the highly enantio-
selective diethylzinc addition to diphenylphosphinoylimines
with up to 98% ee, the best result observed so far for this
transformation. A finding that N-monosubstituted chiral
â-amino alcohols 3 generally gave slightly higher enantio-
selectivities than their N,N-disubstituted analogue 2 will also
be discussed. Chiral ligands were prepared from 1,2-
diphenyl-2-aminoethanol according to the literature. Treat-
ment of (1R,2S)-1,2-diphenyl-2-aminoethanol with aldehydes
followed by a reduction with NaBH4 gave the corresponding
monosubstituent amino alcohols 3a-f, which were subjected
to methylation with HCOOH/HCHO to give compounds 2a-
g.12
Table 1. Diethylzinc Addition to N-Diphenylphosphinoyl
Benzalimine 4a in the Presence of Chiral N,N-Disubstituted
Amino Alcohols 2a
entry
ligand
R
yield (%)b
ee (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
4-MeO
4-BnO
2,4,6-trimethyl
2-Br
3-Cl
4-Cl
94
63
93
35
87
94
80
95
92
84
91
95
93
93
2g
3,4-(OCH2O)-
a The reaction was carried out at room temperature in the presence of a
stoichiometric amount of amino alcohols for 48 h. b Isolated yields.
c Determined on HPLC; the absolute configuration is R.
2 could give good enantioselectivities with up to 95% ee.
The nitrogen substituents in the ligands had an obvious effect
on the enantioselectivity. It seemed that the ligands bearing
a bulkier R group in the benzene ring hindered the enantio-
selectivity. The ligand 2a, in which the R was a 4-methoxyl
group, promoted the reaction in 94% isolated yield with 95%
ee (entry 1), whereas 2b containing a bulkier R group of
(5) (a) Soai, K.; Hatanaka, T.; Miyazawa, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1992, 1097. (b) Andersson, P. G.; Guijarro, D.; Tanner, D. Synlett
1996, 727. (c) Andersson, P. G.; Guijarro, D.; Tanner, D. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 7364. (d) Guijarro, D.; Pinho, P.; Andersson, P. G. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 2530. (e) Brandt, P.; Hedberg, C.; Lawonn, K.; Pinho, P.;
Andersson, P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1692. (f) Jimeno, C.; Reddy, K.
S.; Sola, L.; Moyano, A.; Pericas, M. A.; Riera, A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
3157. (g) Zhang, X. M.; Lin, W. Q.; Gong, L. Z.; Mi, A. Q.; Cui, X.; Jiang,
Y. Z.; Choi, M. C. K.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1535.
(6) (a) Soai, K.; Suzuki, T.; Shono, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1994, 317. (b) Suzuki, T.; Narisada, N.; Shibata, T.; Soai, K. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2519.
(7) Suzuki, T.; Hirokawa, Y.; Ohtake, K.; Shibata, T.; Soai, K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 4033.
(8) Fujihara, H.; Nagai, K.; Tomioka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
12055.
(9) Porter, J. R.; Traverse, J. F.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Snapper, M. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 984.
(10) Reddy, K. S.; Sola, L.; Moyano, A.; Pericas, M. A.; Riera, A.
Synthesis 2000, 165.
(11) Zhang, X. M.; Gong, L. Z.; Mi, A. Q.; Cui, X.; Jiang, Y. Z.; Choi,
M. C. K.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6369.
(12) (a) Li, S. J.; Jiang, Y. Z.; Mi, A. Q. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992,
3, 1467. (b) Mi, A. Q.; Wang, Z. Y.; Jiang, Y. Z. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1993, 4, 1957. (c) Mi, A. Q.; Wang, Z. Y.; Chen, Z. W.; Jiang, Y. Z.;
Chan. A. S. C.; Yang, T. K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2641. (d)
Jiang, Y. Z.; Zhou, X. G.; Hu, W. H.; Wu, L. J.; Mi, A. Q. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1995, 6, 405. (e) Jiang, Y. Z.; Qin, Y.; Mi, A. Q.; Huang, Z. T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 1211.
Figure 1. Chiral â-amino alcohols evaluated in this study.
1400
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 8, 2002