R. I. Kureshy et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 2915–2918
2917
Table 2. Data for the enantioselective epoxidation of styrene with catalyst 1 using pyridine N-oxide and substituted pyridine
N-oxides as an axial base
Axial base
Conversion (%)
Time (h)
ee’s (%)
PyNO
4-PhPyNO
4-PPPyNO
100
100
100
3
1.5
0.5
35
35
35
Table 3. Data for enantioselective epoxidation of styrene
with recycled catalyst in presence of pyridine N-oxide
enhanced activity of dimeric catalyst 1 indicates that
the two units are not working in isolation but have a
cooperative interaction. It is reported13 that the
monomeric catalyst with appropriate N-oxide deriva-
tives as additive serves to activate and stabilize the
catalyst system. Analogously, for dimeric catalyst 1 the
epoxidation of styrene was observed to be faster in the
presence of the 4-phenyl pyridine N-oxide (4-PhPyNO)
and 4-(3-phenyl propyl) pyridine N-oxide (4-PPPyNO)
as compared to pyridine N-oxide. However, no im-
provement in chiral induction was observed (Table 2).
Run
1
2
3
4
5
Conversion (%)
ee’s (%)
Time (h)
100
35
3
90
35
3
80
35
5
60
35
6
55
35
9
Acknowledgements
Furthermore, after one epoxidation cycle the catalyst
was separated from the reaction mixture by precipita-
tion using hexane. The recovered catalyst was reused
for catalytic reactions without further purification. The
results with recycled catalyst are shown in Table 3.
R.I.K. and N.H.K. are thankful to DST and TWAS for
financial assistance and also thankful to Dr. P. K.
Ghosh, Director, of the Institute for providing instru-
mentation facility.
The activity of the recycled catalyst gradually decreased
upon successive use, indicating some degradation of the
catalyst 1 under the epoxidation conditions. However,
no loss was observed in the product ee’s.
References
1. (a) Jacobson, E. N.; Zhang, W.; Guler, M. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6703–6704; (b) Jacobson, E. N.;
Zhang, W.; Muci, A. R.; Ecker, J. R.; Deng, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7063–7064; (c) Zhang, W.; Jacob-
sen, E. N. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2296–2298.
2. (a) Pugin, B.; Blaser, H.-U. In Catalyst Immobilization
Solid Support in Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis III;
Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.; Yamamoto, H., Eds.;
Springer: New York, 1999; p. 1367; (b) Ochme, G. In
Catalyst Immobilization; Two Phase System, in Compre-
hensive Asymmetric Catalysis III; Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz,
A.; Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Vertag: New York,
1999; p. 1378.
3. (a) Brandes, B. D.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 4378–4380; (b) Jacobsen, E. N.; Deng, L.;
Furukawa, Y.; Martinez, L. E. Tetrahedron 1994, 50,
4323–4334.
4. (a) De, B. B.; Lohray, B. B.; Sivaram, S.; Dhal, P. K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2105–2108; (b) De, B.
In conclusion, the dimeric dissymmetric chiral Mn(III)
Schiff base complex worked very well with all non-
functionalised alkenes and the best chiral induction was
obtained with nitro and cyano chromene. Higher rates
of reaction were observed in the presence of substituted
pyridine N-oxides. However, the activity of the recycled
catalyst gradually decreased upon successive use,
showing the degradation of the catalyst 1 under epoxi-
dation conditions. As the catalyst loading could be
reduced to more than half without adversely effecting
activity and selectivity, the two units in the dimer seem
to be working with cooperativity. Further, the symme-
try of individual SALEN units is affected due to the
absence of a tertiary butyl group at the point of connec-
tivity. However, in spite of this, the catalyst still works
well.