ACS Catalysis
Letter
Under modified reaction conditions, substrates bearing two
aryl bromide moieties were found to undergo double gem-
difluorovinylation in high yields, as demonstrated with the
biphenyl and naphthyl products (3ag−aj, see modified
conditions in Scheme 2). Also, the use of a BINOL-derivative
led to facile double gem-difluorovinylation thus affording a
product (3ai), which have potential for applications in ligand
development for asymmetric catalysis.15 An electron-deficient
2,3,4,5-tetraphenylsilole containing two 1,1-difluorovinyl
groups was synthesized in an excellent yield utilizing our
method (3aj). This product might have potential applications in
material science, such as OLED devices16 and sensors for
explosive compounds.17 Finally, the developed cross-electro-
phile coupling methodology was applied for the installation of
gem-difluorovinyl moieties on drug-like scaffolds such as steroid,
amino acid, vitamin, and sugar molecules (3ak−ao). These
results show the great potential of this method for late-stage
derivatization of pharmaceuticals.
Next, we investigated the possibility for using other types of
aryl electrophiles than aryl bromides (Scheme 3a). The use of an
aryl iodide as substrate for this cross-electrophile coupling
reaction afforded the desired product in 80% yield. Homocou-
pling of the aryl iodide was found to be a significant side reaction.
Aryl chlorides showed less reactivity, and after 16 h, most of the
starting material remained unreacted. An aryl tosylate and
triflate did not react under the standard reaction conditions. The
robustness and potential for scale-up of the nickel-catalyzed
cross-electrophile coupling reaction was demonstrated by a
successful reaction on gram-scale (Scheme 3b). Unfortunately,
2-substituted-1,1-difluorovinyl tosylates failed to couple with
aryl bromides.18
suggest that Ni(0) is likely responsible for initiating the reaction,
that Zn(II) promotes the reaction, and that Zn is necessary for
catalytic turnover.
In order to investigate the role of Zn in the nickel-catalyzed
cross-coupling reactions, a reaction with vinyl tosylate 2 under
the standard conditions, but in the absence of aryl bromide, was
set up. Quenching the reaction mixture with I2 led to 56% yield
of 1,1-difluoro-2-iodoethene 5 (Scheme 5-1). In addition, when
zinc reagent 6 was employed instead of vinyl tosylate 2 under the
standard catalytic conditions, 3q was formed in 95% yield
(Scheme 5-2). These results strongly indicate that a 1,1-
difluorovinyl zinc reagent is formed during the cross-coupling
reaction.
To further support the hypothesis that a Ni(0) species
initiates a catalytic cycle by oxidative addition to the aryl
bromide, complex 7 was synthesized.9g The use of a catalytic
amount of 7, instead of NiCl2/L1, afforded 89% yield of the
expected product 3q, indicating that complex 7 is catalytically
competent (Scheme 5-3). Furthermore, we found that complex
7 can react directly with 2,2-difluorovinyl tosylate (2) producing
3q in similar yields in the presence and absence of Zn (Scheme
5-4). The moderate yields are likely due to the high nickel
concentration which was previously found to decrease the yield
in the stoichiometric experiments (Scheme 4-3). Closer
inspection of the reaction mixture for the reaction performed
in the absence of Zn revealed a small amount of homocoupling
product 8. The formation of 8 suggests that a Ni(0) species is
formed which could potentially initiate the reaction by oxidative
addition into the C−OTs bond. Accordingly, it is not necessarily
the nickel(II) complex 7 that initiates the reaction by directly
activating the 2,2-difluorovinyl tosylate (2).
To gain more insight into the reaction mechanism, some
additional experiments were performed (Scheme 4). When the
radical scavenger TEMPO was added to the standard
conditions, the expected product 3q was not detected (Scheme
4-1, entry 1). Considering the poisonous effect that TEMPO can
have on a nickel catalyst, this finding is not conclusive evidence
for a radical process.19 In contrast, the reactions proceeded
cleanly in the presence of other radical scavengers, such as BHT
and 1,1′-diphenylethylene, and 3q was produced in 86% and
90% yield, respectively (Scheme 4-1, entries 2−3). These results
indicate that radicals are not involved in the product-forming
pathways.
Under the standard reaction conditions, methyl 4-bromo-
benzoate (1q) afforded the product 3q in 90% yield, but in the
absence of Zn, no product was observed (Scheme 4-2). This
result suggests that the catalytic cycle does not start from Ni(II)
and that Zn plays a role as a reductant for initiating the reaction.
Notably, the use of a Ni(0) source, Ni(COD)2, instead of NiCl2
led to 5% yield of 3q in the absence of Zn, thus demonstrating
that product formation can start from Ni(0). The use of
Ni(COD)2 in the presence of zinc led to 65% yield of 3q
(Scheme 4-3-i, entry 1). Increasing the catalyst loading to 50%
and even 100%, led to the formation of 3q in 8% and 17% yield,
respectively. (Scheme 4-3-i, entries 2 and 3) Interestingly, the
addition of ZnBr2 (20 mol %) in the stoichiometric reaction in
the absence of Zn improved the yield (Scheme 4-3-i, entry 3).
Notably, the use of a large excess of Zn inhibited the reaction
(Scheme 4-3-i, entries 2 and 3). Finally, the discrete nickel(0)
complex 420 was applied in the reaction leading to reaction
outcomes consistent with the results obtained for Ni(COD)2
(Scheme 4-3-ii). Pleasingly, the yield of 3q reached 91% in the
presence of Zn (Scheme 4-3-ii, entry 1). Overall, these results
Based on the experiments above and literature,21 we propose
two plausible Ni(0)/Ni(II) catalytic cycles with and without Zn
involved in the transmetalation process (Figure 1). First, the
Ni(0) complex formed from reduction of the Ni(II) source
undergoes oxidative addition into both the C−Br and the C−
OTs bond, affording Ar−Ni(II)−Br (A) and (F2CCH)−
Ni(II)−OTs(B), respectively. The subsequent transmetalation
between these two Ni(II) complexes gives Br−Ni(II)−OTs (C)
and (F2CCH)−Ni(II)−Ar (D). Alternatively, the complexes
C and D can be generated via an indirect way by two sequential
transmetalation steps between Ni and Zn species (B + ZnX2 →
C + E, A + E → D + ZnX2) as shown in pathway II.22 Finally, the
reductive elimination from Ni(II) intermediate D generates the
desired gem-difluorovinyl arene product and Ni(0). Meanwhile,
complex C is reduced by Zn to Ni(0). Both of these two Ni(0)
species can take part in the next catalytic cycle.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations23 were then
conducted to assess the feasibility of the two proposed reaction
mechanisms. The reduction of Ni(II) by Zn is thermodynami-
cally favorable (ΔG = −13.2 kcal/mol, Scheme S1), supporting
the role of Zn in the reduction of Ni(II) to Ni(0). As shown in
Figure 2 and Figure S1, the activation barriers for the ensuing
oxidative addition of the Ni(0) complex to 2,2-difluorovinyl
tosylate (2) and methyl 4-bromobenzoate (1q) substrates are
23.7 (TSB0−B) and 14.7 (TS1A0‑A) kcal/mol, respectively. Then,
the direct transmetalation between the two Ni(II) species A and
B to form C and D is calculated to have an activation barrier of
28.8 kcal/mol (TSB‑D, path I in orange). In addition, our
calculations unveiled an energetically more favorable path I’
which involves two consecutive transmetalation steps (TSB−F
and TSF‑D). The first transmetalation step (TSB−F) exchanges
the Br and OTs groups between the two Ni atoms to form F and
13620
ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 13616−13623