Fig. 2. The absorption and emission peaks appear at 359 and 416
nm, respectively.
From the application point of view, one of the most attractive
properties of the polymers is the relatively high PL quantum
yield (Fpl). Both the neutral polymer and the quaternized
polymers display strong blue fluorescence either in solutions or
as films upon exposure to UV light. The Ffl of the neutral
polymer (polymer I) is as high as 97% as measured from its
dilute solution in chloroform.‡ For polymer II (with a degree of
quaternization of 80%), the Fpl was measured to be 86% from
its dilute solution in methanol. When the measurement was
conducted in aqueous solution, the corresponding value of Fpl
is 25%. The decrease of PL efficiency may be attributed to the
aggregation of the polymer in aqueous solution. This was
supported by a further reduced PL efficiency measured in the
solid state (films on quartz plate cast from methanol solution),
which is 4% compared with 9,10-diphenylanthracene as
standard (dispersed in PMMA films with a concentration lower
than 1 3 1023 M, assuming a PL efficiency of 83%).12
In summary, we have synthesized a new cationic water-
soluble conjugated polymer based on the alternating fluorene
and phenylene backbone structure through a facile post-
polymerization approach, which permits a full structural
characterization of the polymer and control of the degree of
cation formation. The polymer emits intense blue fluorescence
both in solutions and in film states. The good water-solubility
and high fluorescence quantum yield make it attractive for
applications in fabricating organic LED devices and as
fluorescent bio-sensory materials.
Fig. 1 1H NMR spectra of polymers I (a) and II (b).
relative integrals of each pair of the split peaks can thus be used
to estimate the degree of quaternization. The highest degree of
quaternization obtained in our experiments is ca. 80%. With
this degree of quaternization, the resulting polymer shows
solubility characteristics opposite to that of polymer I, being
completely soluble in DMSO, methanol, and water but
insoluble in CHCl3 and THF.
Polymer II also possesses good thermal stability. The onset
degradation temperature of this polymer is 300 °C in nitrogen,
whereas it starts to decompose above 230 °C in air, with a small
amount of water loss at lower temperatures. In air, no residue
remained after heating to 800 °C.
The work was partially supported by the National University
of Singapore through a research grant (RP970610).
The UV–VIS absorption spectra of polymer I in chloroform
solution and as a film (on quartz plate, spin-cast from
chloroform solution) are almost identical with the same
maximum absorption at 366 nm. The PL spectrum of the
polymer solution peaks at 414 nm, whereas the polymer film
exhibits an emission maximum at 424 nm with a vibronic
shoulder around 444 nm. The emission spectral feature of the
polymer in the film state is very similar to that of the polymer
having the same backbone structure and substitution on fluorene
unit but without the terminal amino group in the phenylene side
chains.11 This implies that the terminal amino groups are
unlikely to affect the conformation of the backbone in the film
state. For the quaternized sample with the highest degree of
quaternization (ca. 80%), the electronic spectra are remarkably
dependent on the solvent, showing a bathochromic shift with a
decrease in solvent polarity. As displayed in Fig. 2, the polymer
shows absorption maxima at 343, 354 and 367 nm in water,
methanol and DMSO, respectively. The corresponding PL
maxima appear at 409, 409 and 419 nm, respectively. Uniform
and transparent films of the polymer on quartz plates were
prepared by spin-casting its aqueous solution. The UV–VIS
absorption and PL spectra of the polymer film are also shown in
Notes and references
† NMR and elemental analyses data for polymers I and II: polymer I: d (300
MHz, CDCl3) 7.79 (br, 2H, Ar-H), 7.66–7.60 (br, 4H, Ar-H), 7.15 (s, 2H,
Ar-H), 4.09 (br, 4H, –OCH2), 2.67 (br, 4H, –CH2N), 2.27 (s, 12H, NCH3),
2.05 (br, 4H, fluorene 9-H), 1.12–0.78 (br, 22H, –CH2, –CH3). Calc. for
C
39H54O2N2: C, 80.41; H, 9.27; N, 4.81; Br, 0 (terminal group). Found: C,
79.60; H, 8.99; N, 4.90; Br, 0%.
Polymer II: d (300 MHz, CD3OD) 7.93 (br, 2H, Ar-H), 7.70–7.64 (br, 4H,
Ar-H), 7.24 (br, 2H, Ar-H), 4.56 (br, 3.2H, –OCH2), 4.38 (br, 0.8H,
–OCH2), 3.77 (br, 3.2H, –CH2N), 3.52 (br, 0.8H, –CH2N), 3.42 (br, 3.2H,
NCH2CH3), 3.06 (br, 12H, NCH3), 2.87 (br, 4.8H, NCH2CH3), 2.16 (br, 4H,
fluorene 9-H), 1.28–0.80 (br, 22H, –CH2, –CH3). Calc. for C39H54O2
N2·4H2O·1.6C2H5Br (the amounts of H2O and C2H5Br were based on TGA
analysis and 1H NMR): C, 61.10; H, 8.45; Br, 15.46; N, 3.38. Found: C,
60.63; H, 8.29; Br, 16.04; N, 3.52%.
‡ The quantum yields were measured using a Perkin Elmer LS 50B
luminescence spectrometer with dilute solutions (A
< 0.2) at room
temperature.13 Quinine sulfate solution (ca. 1.0 3 1025 M) in 0.10 M
H2SO4 (quantum yield, 55%) was used as a standard.
1 M. Ferreira and M. F. Rubner, Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 7101; A. C.
Fou, O. Onitsuka, M. Ferreira and M. F. Rubner, J. Appl. Phys., 1996,
79, 7501; J. W. Baur, S. Kim, P. B. Balanda, J. R. Reynolds and M. F.
Rubner, Adv. Mater., 1998, 10, 1452.
2 J. Bharathan and Y. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998, 72, 2660; S. C.
Chang, J. Bharathan and Y. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998, 73, 2561.
3 K Fäid and M. Leclere, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2761; J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1998, 120, 5274.
4 A. O. Patil, Y. Ikenoue, F. Wudl and A. J. Heeger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1987, 109, 1858.
5 P. Pickup, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1987, 225, 273.
6 S. Shi and F. Wudl, Macromolecules, 1990, 23, 2119.
7 T. I. Wallow and B. M. Novak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 7411.
8 A. D. Child and J. R. Reynolds, Macromolecules, 1994, 27, 1975.
9 P. B. Balanda, M. B. Ramey and J. R. Reynolds, Macromolecules, 1999,
32, 3970.
10 A. W. Grice, D. D. C. Bradley, M. T. Bernius, M. Inbasekaran, W. W.
Wu and E. P. Woo, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998, 73, 629.
11 W. L. Yu, J. Pei, Y. Cao, W. Huang and A. J. Heeger, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 1837.
12 J. N. Demas and G. A. Crospy, J. Phys. Chem., 1971, 75, 991.
13 H. S. Joshi, R. Jamshidi and Y. Tor, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38,
2722.
Fig. 2 UV–VIS absorption and photoluminescence spectra of polymer II in
solutions and as films. (a) UV in aqueous solution, (b) UV in MeOH, (c) UV
in film, (d) UV in DMSO, (e) PL in MeOH, (f) PL in aqueous solution,
(g) PL as film and (h) PL in DMSO.
Communication b000740o
552
Chem. Commun., 2000, 551–552