10.1002/anie.202109689
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
RESEARCH ARTICLE
initial Pt adding amount) in the crude reaction solution, and almost
no conversion (< 1%) is obtained by using the crude reaction
solution as catalyst, indicating the atomically dispersed Pt on
AHA_U_400 is the real catalytic sites.
leads to silane and olefin adsorbing on different Pt atoms,
resulting in much stronger adsorption (Fig. S15, 4.3 vs 3.5 eV)
and higher energy barrier for the hydrosilylation on
PtNP@AHA_U_400 (Fig. S15). The Pt-C bond length for olefin on
PtNP@AHA_U_400 (2.11 Å) is shorter than that on
Pt1@AHA_U_400 (2.17 Å), indicating stronger coordination
strength. However, moderate coordination strength is beneficial
for rapid hydrosilylation, and too strong or too weak coordination
both slow the reaction.[29] Meanwhile, Bader charge analysis
shows that the charge on Pt (+0.42 e) for the initial reaction
structure of Pt1@AHA_U_400 is much higher than that of Karstedt
catalyst (-0.10 e), which may be beneficial for lowering energy
barrier by optimizing the eletron structure of the transition state
(TS).
Density functional theory studies
Conclusion
A
humic acid based carbonaceous support material
AHA_U_400 was prepared through mild thermal condensation
and cross-linking between artificial humic acid and urea, and the
material proved to enable the preparation of stable Pt single atom
catalyst Pt1@AHA_U_400. HAADF-STEM, CO-DRIFT, EXAFS,
XPS and FIR prove the formation of Pt1 and the chemical
environment of Pt1. The catalyst shows ultrahigh activity and
selectivity in hydrosilylation reaction. DFT calculation show that
the high performance of the catalyst can be attributed to the
atomic dispersion of Pt and the electron deficiency of the Pt1
atoms.
Fig. 4 Reaction paths for hydrosilylation reactions on Pt1@AHA_U_400
and Karstedt’s Pt catalyst. The navy blue, yellow, red, bright blue, gray and
white balls represent Pt, Si, O, N, C and H atoms, respectively. To highlight
the reaction sites, green and pink balls represent the C1 and C2 in
CH2=CH-CH3, respectively. For simplification, propylene and
(MeO)2MeSiH
were
used
to
represent
octene
and
(Me3SiO)2MeSiH/(CH3CH2O)2CH3SiH, respectively. For the hydrosilylation
on Karstedt catalyst, Pt stabilized by olefin model is used according to
literature, and CH2=CH-CH3 was used not only as reactant but also as
ligand.[5]
To elucidate the reaction mechanism of hydrosilylation reaction
on Pt1@AHA_U_400, density functional theory (DFT) calculations
were performed. For comparison, hydrosilylations on Karstedt’s
Pt catalyst and PtNP@AHA_U_400 (Pt (111) surface) were also
calculated. As proposed by Chalk and Harrod, the reaction
mechanism of Pt-catalyzed alkene hydrosilylation can be divided
into three sequential steps: Si-H oxidation addition to Pt, alkene
insertion into the Pt-H bond and Si-C reductive elimination.[27]
However, for modified Chalk-Harrod mechanism, the second step
is alkene insertion into the Pt-Si bond followed by the C-H
reductive elimination as the third step.[28] Both mechanisms on
Pt1@AHA_U_400, Karstedt’s Pt catalyst and PtNP@AHA_U_400
were examined by DFT.
We initiated the reaction by binding silane to the single Pt atom,
with the model matching that in Fig. 3i with chlorine ligands
dissociated and replaced by silane. As shown in Fig. 4 and Fig.
S13, for Pt1@AHA_U_400, the modified Chalk-Harrod
mechanism is more favorable than the Chalk-Harrod mechanism
with much lower energy barrier (0.94 vs 1.35 eV). However, for
Karstedt’ Pt catalyst (Fig. 4 and Fig. S14) and Pt (111) (Fig. S15
and Fig. S16), Chalk-Harrod mechanism is more favorable.
Obviously, the energy barriers for hydrosilylaiton on Karstedt’ Pt
catalyst and Pt (111) are much higher than that on
Pt1@AHA_U_400 (Fig. 4, 1.22 vs 0.94 eV; Fig. S15, 2.92 vs 0.94
eV), which is consistent with their lower activity for hydrosilylation
reaction (Entries 6, 7 and 9, Table 1).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Max-
Planck Society and the support of the technicians in MPIKG.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: artificial humic acid • Pt single atom • urea •
heterogeneous catalysis • hydrosilylation
[1]
a) B. Marciniec, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 2374-2390; b) L. N. Lewis,
J. Stein, Y. Gao, R. E. Colborn, G. Hutchins, Platinum. Met. Rev 1997,
41, 66-75.
[2]
a) I. E. Marko, S. b. Ste´rin, O. Buisine, G. r. Mignani, P. Branlard, B.
Tinant, J.-P. Declercq, Science 2002, 298, 204-206; b) A. M. Tondreau,
C. C. Atienza, K. J. Weller, S. A. Nye, K. M. Lewis, J. G. Delis, P. J. Chirik,
Science 2012, 335, 567-570.
[3]
a) J. L. Speier, J. A. Webster, G. H. Barnes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79,
974-979; b) B. D. Karstedt, N. Scotia, (Ed.: U. S. P. Office), USA, 1973.
X. Du, Z. Huang, ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1227-1243.
[4]
[5]
J. Stein, L. N. Lewis, Y. Gao, R. A. Scott, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
3693-3703.
The ultrahigh activity of Pt1@AHA_U_400 catalyst may be
attributed to the atomic dispersion of isolated Pt atoms and the
electron deficiency of the Pt1 atoms. Compared to
Pt1@AHA_U_400, the accessible neighboring adsorption Pt sites
[6]
a) T. Troadec, A. Prades, R. Rodriguez, R. Mirgalet, A. Baceiredo, N.
Saffon-Merceron, V. Branchadell, T. Kato, Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 8234-
8240; b) T. Iimura, N. Akasaka, T. Kosai, T. Iwamoto, Dalton Trans. 2017,
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.