BOB(NHR)(NR)]2+ there is strong BN p bonding within each
RN(RNH)B unit to the imino (NR) residue, much less to the
imine (RNH) residue, though evidently sufficient to ensure
planarity of the (PN)2BO unit.
Our work suggests that the formation of an adduct
C2B10H12·L, with an expected nido-structure, is the first step in
the deboronation of ortho-carborane by HNP(NMe2)3 and
presumably other Lewis bases L. Further studies, both experi-
mental and theoretical, will be needed to clarify the later
steps.
We are grateful to the EPSRC (M. A. F.), BNFL (T. G. H.)
and Durham University (Sir Derman Christopherson Fellow-
ship to J. A. K. H. and studentship to A. M.) for financial
support.
Notes and references
† NMR data for cation of 3: dP (d8-toluene; standard 85% H3PO4) 43.2, dH
2.33 [J(PH) 10 Hz, CH3] dC 36.7 [J(PC) 18 Hz, CH3]; for cation of 4: dP
40.2 (br, 1P), 23.6 (br, 2P), dB (standard BF3·Et2O), 22.3 (s), dH 2.46
[3J(PH) 10 Hz, 18H, CH3], 2.43 [J(PH) 10 Hz, 36H, CH3], dC 37.1 [J(PC)
18 Hz], 36.8 [J(PC) 18 Hz].
‡ Crystal data for 2: C8H31B10N4P, M = 322.44, orthorhombic, space
group Pbca (no. 61), a = 10.799(2), b = 17.252(4), c = 20.326(4) Å, U =
3786.9(13) Å3, Z = 8, Dc = 1.131 g cm23, m = 0.141 mm21, F(000) =
1376, T = 153(2) K, 25525 reflections (4337 unique), 2q @55º, R1 = 0.077
(2221 data I > 2s(I)), wR(F2) = 0.187, GOF (obs) = 1.053. For 3:
C8H32B9N4P, M = 312.64, monoclinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a =
11.580(2), b = 13.182(3) , c = 12.385(2) Å, b = 91.88(5)°, U = 1889.5(6)
Å3, Z = 4, Dc = 1.099 g cm23, m = 0.140 mm21, F(000) = 672, T =
150(2) K, 14804 reflections (4992 unique), 2q @ 58°, R1 = 0.0435 (4283
data I > 2s(I)), wR(F2) = 0.118, GOF(obs) = 1.085. All NMe2 groups of
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of adduct 2 (50% ellipsoids; methyl hydrogens
omitted for clarity). Important interatomic distances (Å) are: P(1)–N(1)
1.651(3), N(1)–H(13) 0.75(4), N(1)–B(12) 1.506(6), B(12)–H(12) 1.18(4),
C(7)–C(8) 1.530(6), C(7)–B(11) 1.654(6), C(8)–B(9) 1.651(6), B(12)–
B(10) 1.761(6), B(12)–B(9) 2.099(6), B(12)–B(11) 2.091(6), B(10)–B(9)
1.779(6), B(10)–B(11) 1.802(6). Selected angle (°): P–N(1)–B(12)
127.3(3).
the cation are disordered. For 5: C28H98B20N16P4O, M
= 1015.30,
orthorhombic, space group P212121 (no. 19), a = 14.105(3), b = 16.529(3),
c = 25.563(5) Å, U = 5960(2) Å3, Z = 4, Dc = 1.132 g cm23, m = 0.168
mm21, F(000) = 2184, T = 150(2) K, 44070 reflections (16579 unique), 2q
@ 61°, R1 = 0.062 (5792 data I > 2s(I)), wR(F2) = 0.138, GOF (obs) =
0.893. The absolute configuration was determined; Flack parameter
1999/1649/ for crystallographic files in .cif format.
§ Calculated (GIAO HF/6-31G*) 11B NMR data for 2: d 35.7 (B12), 26.3
(B5,6), 26.6 (B2,4), 213.9 (B3), 215.4 (B9,11), 218.3 (B10), 224.0
(B1).
¶ Calculated (AM1) bond orders for 5 (p bond order in parentheses): B(1)–
O(1) 1.029 (0.207), B(1)–N(1) 1.311 (0.441), B(1)–N(3) 0.829 (0.086),
B(2)–O(1) 0.932 (0.152), B(2)–N(4) 0.920 (0.129), B(2)–N(2) 1.317
(0.444).
1 J. Plesˆek, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 269 and references therein; M. F.
Hawthorne, in Advances in Boron Chemistry, ed. W. Siebert, The Royal
Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1997, p. 261 and references therein.
2 R. A. Wiesboeck and M. F. Hawthorne, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86,
1642; L. I. Zakharkin and V. N. Kalinin, Tetrahedron Lett., 1965, 7,
407.
3 M. F. Hawthorne, D. C. Young, P. M. Garrett, D. A. Owen, S. G.
Schwerin, F. N. Tebbe and P. A. Wegner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90,
862; L. I. Zakharkin and V. S. Kirillova, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div.
Chem. Sci. (Engl. Transl.), 1975, 2484.
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of cation in 5 (50% ellipsoids; methyl hydrogens
omitted for clarity). Important interatomic distances (Å) are: B(1)–N(1)
1.402(6), B(1)–N(3) 1.463(5), B(1)–O(1) 1.373(5), B(2)–N(2) 1.389(5),
B(2)–N(4) 1.464(6), B(2)–O(1) 1.416(5), N(1)–P(1) 1.555(3), N(2)–P(2)
1.554(3), N(3)–P(3) 1.630(4), N(4)–P(4) 1.614(3).
4 H. Tomita, H. Luu and T. Onak, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 812.
5 M. A. Fox, J. A. H. MacBride and K. Wade, Polyhedron, 1997, 16, 2499;
M. A. Fox and K. Wade, Polyhedron, 1997, 16, 2517.
6 N. N. Greenwood and A. Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements, 1st edn.,
Pergamon, Oxford, 1984, p. 209 and references therein; J. Plesˆek and S.
Heˆrmánek, Inorg. Synth., 1984, 22, 231 and references therein.
7 M. G. Davidson, T. G. Hibbert, J. A. K. Howard, A. Mackinnon and K.
Wade, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2285; A. I. Yanovskii, Yu. T. Struchkov,
L. E. Vinogradova and L. A. Leites, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem.
Sci. 1983, 1988.
8 F. Meyer, J. Muller, P. Paetzold and R. Boese, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1992, 31, 1227 and references therein.
9 L. I. Zakharkin, G. G. Zhigareva, A. V. Polyakov, A. I. Yanovskii and Y.
T. Struchkov, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. (Engl. Transl.),
1987, 798.
the cage carbons in the carborane adduct 2 were conclusively
determined by an ab initio optimization of a model of
C2B10H12·HNP(NH2)3 at the HF/6-31G* level of theory where
both theoretical and experimental geometries are nearly identi-
cal. These carbon placements are supported by a similar cage
geometry observed in the nido-C2B10 moiety of the two-cage
anion [PhCB10H10CB10H10C2HPh]2 structurally characterized
by X-ray crystallography.9
During attempts to obtain suitable crystals of the salt 4
containing the cation (Me2N)3PNHB[NP(NMe2)3]2+ from tolu-
ene, a single crystal was characterized by an X-ray study‡ as a
salt 5 containing the dication [(Me2N)3PNHBNP(NMe2)3]2O2+
(Fig. 2). The oxygen atom apparently arose from inadequately
dried toluene. According to bond order calculations¶ (AM1)
carried out on the structure of the dication [RN(RNH)-
Communication 9/03030A
1650
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1649–1650