We recently disclosed that nucleophiles containing two
tethered carbon acids (1) underwent two sequential Michael
reactions to 3-butyn-2-one to give functionalized cycloal-
kanes (2) containing two new quaternary centers (Scheme
1).15-17 The reactions proceeded when at least one of the
Scheme 2
Scheme 1
determined by X-ray crystallography. The reaction of 1d with
4-hexyn-3-one proceeds similarly to afford trans-decalin 3b
as a single stereoisomer in 49% yield.20 These remarkably
efficient reactions create three new CsC σ bonds, two new
rings, two or three new stereocenters, and three new
contiguous quaternary centers in one step from two non-
stereogenic, readily available starting materials with excellent
stereoselectivity and complete atom economy, albeit in
moderate yield.21
The double annulation takes a very different course when
the electrophile has an Et group attached to the triple bond.
When 1c is combined with 3-hexyn-2-one in THF with
catalytic NaH, the double Michael reaction is followed by
attack of the nascent enolate oxygen on a CN group to give
cis-hexahydroisochromanone 4a as a single stereoisomer in
79% yield after aqueous acidic workup (Scheme 3). The
groups attached to the acidic carbons was a CN group.
Compound 2 could then be induced to undergo a Dieckmann
reaction to give a trans-decalin (X ) CH2) or a trans-
hydrindan (X ) nothing).
Although dicyano diesters 1a and 1b smoothly underwent
double Michael reactions with the terminal alkynone 3-butyn-
2-one, multiple attempts to promote their double Michael
reaction with internal alkynones failed to provide any
identifiable cyclic products. In our earlier work we had taken
advantage of the very low steric bulk of the cyano group,15
and so we decided to see whether tethered carbon acids
containing only cyano groups were sufficiently unhindered
to react with internal alkynones in a double Michael reaction.
The requisite tetranitriles 1c-e (Scheme 1) were easily
prepared in good yield using the protecting group methodol-
ogy we have reported;18 that is, (3-pentylidene)malononitrile
was alkylated with an R,ω-dibromide, and the product was
deblocked by ozonolysis and reflux in acidic EtOH. Unfor-
tunately, we were unable also to prepare tetranitrile 1f in
this way, as it rapidly underwent a Thorpe-Ziegler reaction
under the conditions of the deblocking. Both 1c and 1e
smoothly underwent the double Michael reaction with
terminal alkynone 3-butyn-2-one to give monocyclic products
2c and 2e in 67% and 66% yields, respectively (Scheme 1).
Scheme 3
structure of 4a has been established by X-ray crystallography.
The reaction of 1d with 3-hexyn-2-one proceeds similarly
to afford 4b as a single stereoisomer in 29% yield, and 1c
also reacts stereoselectively with 4-heptyn-3-one to give 4c
in 45% yield.21 Either complex mixtures are formed or no
reaction occurs when 1c is combined with the more sterically
hindered electrophiles 4-phenyl- and 4-trimethylsilyl-3-butyn-
2-one.
When 1c is combined with internal alkynone 4-hexyn-3-
one in THF with 1 equiv of NaH, not only does the double
Michael reaction proceed smoothly, but it is followed
immediately by a Thorpe-Ziegler reaction19 to give trans-
decalin 3a as a single stereoisomer in 48% isolated yield
(Scheme 2). The stereochemistry at the ring junction has been
(20) The crystal structure of 3a reveals NsH‚‚‚OdC hydrogen bonds
(1.99 and 2.15 Å) involving both O lone pairs and both NH hydrogens,
and its IR spectrum (KBr) shows two strong, broad absorbances at 3353
and 3195 cm-1. By contrast, the IR spectrum of 3b shows five strong, sharp
absorbances at 3440, 3411, 3350, 3275, and 3242 cm-1, perhaps indicating
a lesser degree of hydrogen bonding in this compound. The carbonyl regions
of the IR spectra of both of these compounds are also unusual: 3a shows
a strong absorbance at 1551 cm-1 and a weaker one at 1666 cm-1, whereas
3b shows a strong absorbance at 1548 cm-1 and weaker ones at 1654, 1623,
(15) Grossman, R. B.; Varner, M. A.; Skaggs, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 340.
(16) Grossman, R. B.; Rasne, R. M.; Patrick, B. O. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 7173.
and 1599 cm-1
.
(17) Grossman, R. B.; Pendharkar, D. S.; Patrick, B. O. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 7178.
(18) Grossman, R. B.; Varner, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5235.
(19) Schaefer, J. P.; Bloomfield, J. J. Org. React. (N. Y.) 1967, 15, 1.
(21) Although the yields are low or moderate in some cases, in no case
does GC-MS analysis of the crude reaction mixture show any evidence for
products with molecular weights identical or close to those of the isolated
products.
1584
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 10, 1999