COMMUNICATIONS
1
(EtOAc/cyclohexane 1/3) to afford 4 (410 mg, 79%). H NMR (250 MHz,
CDCl3): d 7.31 ± 7.19 (m, 17H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 3.69 (s, 4H), 3.25 (d, 4H, J
5.7 Hz), 2.97 (s, 2H), 1.48 (s, 3H), 1.26 (s, 12H); MS (CI, NH3): m/z: 609
(MH ). 2) To a solution of 4 (400 mg, 0.66 mmol) in THF (4 mL) and liquid
ammonia (6 mL) cooled to 458C were added small portions of Na
(ꢀ91 mg, 4 mmol) until the blue color remained for 30 mn. After addition
of solid NH4Cl (400 mg) and evaporation of ammonia, HCl (2m) was added
(pH 1). Extraction with CH2Cl2 followed by chromatography over silica gel
(EtOAc/cyclohexane 1/4) gave ligand
1
(203 mg, 91%). 1H NMR
(250 MHz, DMSO): d 7.83 (t, 2H), 3.25 (d, 4H), 3.01 (d, 2H), 2.72 (s,
1
2H), 2.15 (t, 1H), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 12H); IR (CHCl3): nÄ 1675 cm
(C O); high-resolution MS (CI, CH4): m/z calcd for C13H27O2N2S3 (MH ):
339.1235, found: 339.1234.
5: To a solution of 1 (622 mg, 1.84 mmol) and NaH (224 mg, 9.35 mmol) in
DMF (11 mL) cooled to 58C was added a solution of FeCl3 (296 mg,
1.83 mmol) in DMF (1.5 mL). The deep red solution was stirred at 58C
for 1 h, and then solid Et4NCl (610 mg, 3.68 mmol) was added. After
addition of EtOAc (145 mL), the solution was kept at 208C for one night.
The remaining operations were carried out in air. The red precipitate was
isolated, dried under vacuum, and dissolved in CH3CN. The solution was
then filtered over celite. The solvent was evaporated to afford 5 as a highly
hygroscopic, deep red solid (1.1 g, 87%).
Figure 2. EPR spectrum of 5 in MeCN at 10 K (g? 3.75, gk 2.01).
The IR spectrum (KBr pellet) of 5 shows a characteristic
nCO frequency at 1575 cm 1 for coordinated N-carboxamido[2a]
1
and a strong band at 1040 cm corresponding to the nSO
stretching of the O-coordinated sulfinate.[6] The UV/Vis
spectrum of 5 in MeCN exhibits an absorption band at
Received: May 10, 1999
Revised version: July 22, 1999 [Z13397IE]
German version: Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3736 ± 3738
1
475 nm (e 5000 Lmol 1 cm ), which is responsible for the
red color. The resonance Raman spectrum of 5 in MeCN with
an excitation at 476.5 nm shows three bands at 604 (Fe O
1
stretching[7]), 978, and 1160 cm (S O stretching[6]), which
Keywords: iron ´ N ligands ´ nitrile hydratases ´ O ligands ´
support O-sulfinato coordination to the iron as observed in
the solid state. Moreover, the excitation profiles of the three
bands in the region of 450 ± 530 nm enable us to assign the
band at 475 nm in the UV/Vis spectrum to a sulfinate-to-metal
charge-transfer transition.
S ligands
[1] a) S. Nagashima, M. Nakasato, N. Dohmae, M. Tsujimura, K. Takio,
M. Odaka, M. Yohda, N. Kamiya, I. Endo, Nature Struct. Biol. 1998, 5,
347 ± 351, and references therein; b) H. Yamada, M. Kobayashi,
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 1391 ± 1400; c) W. Huang, J. Jia,
J. Cumming, M. Nelson, G. Schneider, Y. Lindqvist, Structure 1997, 5,
691 ± 699; d) P. E. Doan, M. J. Nelson, H. Jin, B. M. Hoffman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7014 ± 7015.
[2] a) J. C. Noveron, M. M. Olmstead, P. K. Mascharak, Inorg. Chem.
1998, 37, 1138 ± 1139; b) L. A. Tyler, J. C. Noveron, M. M. Olmstead,
P. K. Mascharak, Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 616 ± 617.
To our knowledge, complex 5 is the first example of an iron
complex with such a mixed coordination sphere and the first
example to result from air oxidation of an iron-coordinated
thiolato ligand to an O-bound sulfinato ligand. Oxidation of
thiolato ± iron complexes by dioxygen is known to give
noncoordinated disulfides or thiolato m-oxo complexes.[8]
A
few examples of sulfinato ± nickel complexes have been
reported that result from nucleophilic attack of bound
thiolate(s) on dioxygen.[9] We do not know yet whether the
oxidation to give 5 starts by activation of dioxygen by the
metal or by reaction of dioxygen with the bound thiolate. Very
recently, dioxygen oxidation of a thiolato ± CoIII complex to a
S-sulfenato and S-sulfinato complexes was reported,[10] and a
S-sulfinato ± FeIII complex has been obtained by H2O2 oxida-
tion of a thiolato ± FeIII complex.[2b] Moreover, O-sulfinato
complexes are known to rearrange into their more stable S-
sulfinato form.[11] In complex 5, the central side chain of the
polydentate ligand might be too short to allow stable
coordination through S. This question is under examination,
as is the possible oxidation of a second thiolato ligand.
[3] a) H. Böhme, H. G. Greve, Chem. Ber. 1952, 85, 409 ± 414; b) F. I.
Carroll, J. D. White, M. E. Wall, J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 1240 ± 1243.
[4] X-ray crystal structure analysis of 5: A red single crystal (0.5 Â 0.5 Â
0.5 mm3) of 5, (C13H21FeN2O4S3)(NEt4)2, grown from DMF/Et2O, was
glued in araldite; Nonius CAD4 diffractometer, T 253 K. Ortho-
rhombic space group P212121, a 10.912(4), b 17.723(6), c
18.699(7) , V 3616(2) 3, Z 4, 1calcd 1.25 gcm 3. Anomalous
dispersion terms and correction of secondary extinction were applied.
The structure was solved by SHELXS-86 and refined by least-squares
analysis using anisotropic thermal parameters for the atoms of the
anionic complex and isotropic thermal parameters for the cation
Et4N . The hydrogen atoms were introduced in calculated positions;
2335 reflections [Fo > 3s(Fo)], R1 0.0727, wR2 0.0877, 292 least-
squares parameters. The programs CRYSTALS and CAMERON
were used. Two equivalent positions S31 and S32 are found in the crystal
lattice due to positional disorder resulting from the coordination of
either O3 or O4. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors)
for the structure reported in this paper has been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publica-
tion no. CCDC-120197. Copies of the data can be obtained free of
charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2
1EZ, UK (fax: (44)1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
[5] T. J. Collins, K. L. Kostka, E. Münck, E. S. Uffelman, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 5637 ± 5639.
Experimental Section
All operations were carried under argon, unless mentioned otherwise, with
standard Schlenk techniques. Solvents were dried and distilled before use.
1: 1) A solution of 2[3a] (263 mg, 0.85 mmol) was added under argon at 08C
to a mixture of 3[3b] (500 mg, 2.56 mmol) and AlMe3 (2m in heptane,
1.7 mL) in toluene (8 mL). After the mixture was heated at reflux for one
night, the reaction was quenched by HCl (2m). Extraction with EtOAc
gave a crude product, which was purified by chromatography over silica gel
[6] G. Vitzthum, E. Lindner, Angew. Chem. 1971, 83, 315; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 1971, 10, 315 ± 326.
[7] a) R. Y. N. Ho, G. Roelfes, B. L. Feringa, L. Que, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 264 ± 265; b) T. C. Higgs, D. Ji, R. S. Czernuscewicz, C. J.
Carrano, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1999, 286, 80 ± 92.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, No. 23
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1999
1433-7851/99/3823-3527 $ 17.50+.50/0
3527