diols 10 were anticipated to be readily available from (S)-
(-)-ethyl lactate.10
Scheme 1
For the approach adumbrated in Scheme 2 to be successful,
Prins-pinacol condensation of 10 and 11 must take place with
stereoselective incorporation of the ketone fragment. To gain
insight into stereochemical control elements in Prins-pinacol
reactions of unsymmetrical ketones, rearrangements of acetals
12 derived from 3,4-dimethyl-4-penten-2,3-diol11 and a series
of unsymmetrical ketones were investigated. Results are
summarized in Scheme 3.12 Stereoselection in the reaction
Scheme 3
products.8 Although the condensation of allylic diols 4 and
aldehydes (5, R6 ) H) has been employed to stereoselectively
assemble chiral tetrahydrofurans having substituents at each
ring carbon, we had not previously investigated stereoselec-
tion in the condensation of allylic diols with unsymmetrical
ketones. The opportunity to rectify this deficiency in our
understanding of the Prins-pinacol synthesis of tetrahydro-
furans and to examine the viability of introducing a hydroxyl
group at C3 of a 4-acyltetrahydrofuran by way of a silyl
surrogate9 led us to pursue the total synthesis of (-)-
citreoviral (2) by the strategy outlined in Scheme 2. The
of the series of methyl ketones increased approximately with
the size of the R1 substituent. Steric effects obviously play
the dominant role, with electronic effects being less impor-
tant. The preference for forming tetrahydrofuran 13 having
the larger C2 substituent on the â face is consistent with
this group preferentially occupying a pseudoequatorial posi-
tion in the Prins cyclization step (7 f 8, Scheme 1). We
concluded from this brief study that for 9 to be highly favored
in the pivotal Prins-pinacol conversion, the protecting group
of the 1-hydroxy-2-propanone component 11 would need to
be a large group. A tert-butyldiphenylsilyl (TBDPS) group
was chosen both for its steric size and its stability to Lewis
acids.
Scheme 2
Our synthesis of (-)-citreoviral begins with construction
of enantioenriched allylic diols 18 from (S)-3-(tert-butyl-
diphenylsiloxy)-2-butanone (16)10 and 1-(dimethylphenylsil-
yl)propyne (15).13 Using tantalum chemistry developed by
Takai and Utimoto,14 the tantalum alkyne complex derived
unnatural enantiomer 2 was targeted since this congener had
not been prepared previously and enantioenriched allylic
(4) (()-Citreoviridin: (a) Williams, D. R.; White, F. H. J. Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 5067-5079. (()-Citreoviral: (b) Williams, D. R.; White, F. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 2529-2532. (c) Bowden, M. C.; Patel, P.;
Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 4793-4796. (d) Bowden, M.
C.; Patel, P.; Pattenden, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 1947-
1950. (e) Begley, M. J.; Bowden, M. C.; Patel, P.; Pattenden, G. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 1951-1958. (f) Ebenezer, W.; Pattenden, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4053-4056.
(5) (-)-Citreoviridin and (+)-citreoviral: (a) Nishiyama, S.; Shizuri, Y.;
Yamamura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 231-234. (b) Suh, H.; Wilcox,
C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 470-481. (c) Whang, K.; Venkataraman,
H.; Kim, Y. G.; Cha, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 7174-7177.
(+)-Citreoviral: (d) Hatakeyama, S.; Matsui, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Sakurai, K.;
Takano, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 6485-6488.
(7) For the original discovery of this route to tetrahydrofurans, see:
Martinet, P.; Mousset, G. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1970, 1071-1076.
(8) See, inter alia: (a) Grese, T. A.; Hutchinson, K. D.; Overman, L. E.
J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2468-2477. (b) MacMillan, D. W. C.; Overman,
L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10391-10392.
(9) Colvin, E. W. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Heathcock, C. H., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1992; Vol. 7, pp 641-651.
(10) Overman, L. E.; Rishton, G. M. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New
York, 1998; Collect. Vol. 9, pp 139-142.
(11) This diol was a 7:1 mixture of anti and syn isomers.6c
(12) Stereochemical assignments for tetrahydrofuran products 13 and 14
were secured by nOe experiments. Details are provided in Supporting
Information.
(6) For brief reviews, see: (a) Overman, L. E. Aldrichimica Acta 1995,
28, 107-120. (b) Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 352-359. (c)
Overman, L. E.; Rishton, G. M. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York,
1998; Collect. Vol. 9, pp 4-9.
(13) Available in 89% yield from silylation of 1-lithiopropyne: Meinke,
P. T.; Krafft, G. A.; Guram, A. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3632-3634.
(14) Kataoka, Y.; Miyai, J.; Oshima, K.; Takai, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 1973-1981.
224
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 2, 2000