Chemistry Letters 2000
1271
3
4
a) L. K. Johnson, C. M. Killian, and M. S. Broookhart, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 117, 6414 (1995). b) C. M. Killian, D. J. Temple, L.
K. Johnson, and M. S. Brookhart, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 11664
(1996). c) C. Wang, A. Friedrich, T. R. Younkin, R. T. Li, R. H.
Grubbs, A. Bansleben, and M. W. Day, Organometallics, 17, 3149
(1998). d) B. L. Small, M. S. Brookhart, and A. A. Bennett, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 120, 4049 (1998). e) G. J. P. Britovsec, V. C. Gibson,
B. S. Kimberley, J. Maddox, S. J. McTavish, G. A. Solan, A. P.
White, and D. J. Williams, Chem. Commun., 1998, 849.
a) T. Fujita, M. Mitani, Y, Tohi, H. Makio, and N. Kihara,
MetCon’99, Houston, June, 1999, Abstr. b) T. Fujita, M. Mitani,
S. Matsui, J. Saito, Y. Tohi, T. Nakano, and H. Tanaka, Proceeding
of the 3rd Seminar on Science and Technology – Catalysis – ,
Fukuoka, March 2000, Abstr., 131. c) S. Matsui, M. Mitani, J.
Saito, Y. Tohi, H. Makio, H. Tanaka, and T. Fujita, Chem. Lett.,
1999, 1263. d) S. Matsui, M. Mitani, J. Saito, N. Matsukawa, H.
Tanaka, T. Nakano, and T. Fujita, Chem. Lett., 2000, 554. e) S.
Matsui and T. Fujita, Catal. Today, in press.
a) J. D. Scollard, D. H. McConville, N. C. Payne, and J. J. Vittal,
Macromolecules, 29, 5241 (1996). b) K. Nomura, N. Naga, and K.
Takaoki, Macromolecules, 31, 8009 (1998). c) Y. M. Leon, S. J.
Park, J. Heo, and K. Kim, Organometallics, 17, 3161 (1998). d) F.
J. Schattenmann, R. R. Schrock, and W. M. Davis,
Organometallics, 17, 989 (1998).
a) S. Matsui, Y. Tohi, M. Mitani, J. Saito, H. Makio, H. Tanaka,
M. Nitabaru, T. Nakano, and T. Fujita, Chem. Lett., 1999, 1065. b)
D. W. Stephan, F. Guérin, R. E. v. H. Spence, L. Kock, X. Gao, S.
J. Brouwn, J. W. Swabey, Q. Wang, W. Xu, P. Zoricak, and D. G.
Harrison, Organometallics, 18, 2046 (1999).
generated from neutral complex 1 in the presence of ethylene
was ascertained by DFT calculation (Figure 2).11 In conse-
quence, the cationic complex is suggested to possess two avail-
able cis-located sites needed for efficient olefin polymerization.
Subsequently, complexes 1 and 2 were investigated as eth-
ylene polymerization catalysts using MAO as a cocatalyst at 25
°C under ethylene at atmospheric pressure (Table 1, entries 1
and 2).12 Complex 1 furnished an activity of 6000 kg-poly-
mer·mol-Ti–1·h–1. As far as we are aware, this is one of the
highest activity values displayed by homogeneous titanium
complexes with no Cp ligand(s) under the same polymerization
conditions. The viscosity-average molecular weight (Mv) value
of the polymer thus obtained was 7.5 × 104.13 Interestingly,
complex 2, having a cyclohexyl group instead of the phenyl
group, displayed 14100 kg-polymer·mol-Ti–1·h–1 of activity
with a very high Mv value of 260.1 × 104. This activity value,
14100 kg-polymer·mol-Ti–1·h–1, is comparable to that of
Cp2TiCl2 (16700 kg-polymer·mol-Ti–1·h–1 ).
5
6
Alternatively, using Ph3C+B–(C6F5)4/iBu3Al as a cocatalyst
in the place of MAO, these complexes provided polyethylene
which did not dissolve wholly in decalin solvent under the
intrinsic viscosity measurement conditions, suggesting that the
polyethylene thus obtained possesses exceptionally high molec-
ular weight (Table 1, entries 4 and 5).12,13
7
8
9
V. C. Gibson, P. J. Maddox, C. Newton, C. Redshaw, G. A. Solan,
A. J. P. White, and D. J. Williams, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1651.
S. Matsui, M. Nitabaru, Y. Yoshida, M. Mitani, and T. Fujita, EP
Patent 1008595 (2000); Chem. Abstr., 133, 43969 (2000).
Complex 1: 1H-NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): δ =
6.0–7.9 (m, 6H(pyrrole ring)+10H(benzene ring); aromatic-H),
7.80 (s, 2H; CH=N). Anal. Found: C, 58.29; H, 3.95; N, 12.62%.
Calcd for C22H18N4TiCl2: C, 57.80; H, 3.97; N, 12.25%. FD-mass:
m/z: 456 (M+). Crystal data for complex 1: Formula
C22H18N4Cl2Ti, FW = 457.22, monoclinic, P21/n, a = 11.606(2), b
= 14.200(2), c = 14.294(2) Å, β = 113.59(1)°, V = 2158.9(6) Å3, Z
= 4, Dcalcd = 1.407 g/cm3, T = 296 K, 5175 unique reflections,
R(Rw) = 0.031(0.029). Complex 2: 1H-NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3,
25 °C, TMS): δ = 0.7–2.7 (m, 22H; cyclohexyl-H), 6.2–7.9 (m, 6H;
aromatic-H), 8.00 (s, 2H; CH=N). Anal. Found: C, 56.79; H,
6.71; N, 12.12%. Calcd for C22H30N4TiCl2: C, 56.31; H, 6.44; N,
11.94%. FD-mass: m/z: 468 (M+). Crystal data for complex 2:
Formula C22H18N4TiCl2, FW = 469.31, monoclinic, P21/c, a =
14.064(9), b = 11.446(2), c = 14.354(2) Å, β = 92.06(3), V =
2309(1) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalcd = 1.350 g/cm3, T = 150 K, 4699 unique
reflections, R1 = 0.058 (for 4496 data with I > 2σ(I)), R(Rw) =
0.114(0.166). Single crystals of the titanium complexes 1 or 2 suit-
able for X-ray analysis were grown from a saturated hexane /
CH2Cl2 solutions.
10 I. Kim, Y. Nishihara, R. F. Jordan, R. D. Rogers, A. L. Rheingold,
and G. P. A.Yap, Organometallics, 16, 3314 (1997).
11 DFT calculation has been widely used for structural determination
of transition metal complexes, cf.; L. Deng, T. Zieglar, T. K. Woo,
P. Margl, and L. Fan, Organometallics, 17, 3240 (1998). All cal-
culations were performed using gradient corrected density func-
tional method BLYP, by means of the Amsterdam Density
Functional (ADF) program. We used the electronic configuration
of molecular system described by a triple -ζ basis set on the metal
center. A double -ζ basis set was used for ethylene as a monomer
and methyl group as a model of polymer chain. For the other
atoms, a single -ζ basis set was used.
In summary, two new titanium complexes having two
pyrolide-imine ligands were introduced. These complexes
exhibited high ethylene polymerization activity using MAO or
Ph3C+B–(C6F5)4/iBu3Al as cocatalysts. These results together
with our previous reports suggest that both titanium and zirco-
nium complexes bearing multidentate and non-symmetric lig-
ands have high potential as highly active new olefin polymer-
ization catalysts.4,6a
12 General polymerization procedure: Flow of ethylene gas was
charged into toluene with vigorous stirring. To this solution, MAO
and a toluene solution of a complex was added. In the case of
We thank Dr. T. Oshiki, Okayama University, for X-ray
measurement and analysis.
i
Ph3C+B–(C6F5)4/iBu3Al cocatalyst system, Bu3Al, complex solu-
tion, Ph3C+B–(C6F5)4 were added, in this order, to the solution.
13 Mv values were calculated from the following equation, [η] = 6.2
× 10–4Mv0.7; R. Chiang, J. Polymer Sci., 36, 91 (1959). Intrinsic
viscosity [η] was measured in decalin at 135 °C using an
Ubbelohde viscometer. Preparation of intrinsic viscosity measure-
ment solution; 25 mg of polyethylene was dissolved into 25 mL of
decalin at 135 °C.
References and Notes
1
H. Sinn, W. Kaminsky, H. J. Vollmer, and R. Woldt, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 19, 390 (1980).
a) G. J. P. Biritovsek, V. C. Gibson, and D. F. Wass, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 38, 428 (1999). b) S. D. Ittel, L. K. Johnson,
and M. Brookhart, Chem. Rev., 100, 1169 (2000).
2