11046 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 43, 1998
Adam et al.
Scheme 3. Selective R Oxidation of the Prochiral
R Methylenic Group
Similar results were obtained for the R oxidation of alkynoic
acids. While the dec-4-ynoic acid (1k) and hexadec-4-ynoic
acid (1l) were not accepted as substrates by the R-oxidation
enzyme (not shown in Table 1), the hexadec-5-ynoic acid (1m)
was converted to the 2-hydroxy acid 2m and the aldehyde 3m
(Table 1, entry 10). In the case of the alkyloxy derivatives of
the propionic and butyric acid, the 3-octyloxypropanoic acid
(1n) was not oxidized (not shown in Table 1), but the
4-decyloxybutanoic acid (1o) was transformed to the enantio-
merically pure (R)-2-hydroxy acid 2o and the aldehyde 3o in a
ratio of 49:51 at 87% conversion (Table 1, entry 11). Although
sebacic acid (1p) resists R oxidation by this enzyme system, its
methyl ester 1q is R-hydroxylated (Table 1, entry 12), albeit at
a significantly diminished reaction rate. Thus, these results show
that fatty acids with less than three carbon atoms between the
carboxylic acid group and functionalities such as a triple or
double bond and also a heteroatom are generally not accepted
by this enzymatic R-oxidation system. Furthermore, more
hydrophilic carboxylic acids with short alkyl chains12 or the
dicarboxylic acids 1p and 1q represent very poor substrates.
A more detailed study was conducted with myristic acid (1a),
one of the best substrates for this enzyme system. Thus, its
R-oxidase-catalyzed hydroxylation with crude homogenate at
pH 6 led to the enantiomerically pure (R)-2-hydroxymyristic
acid (2a) and the aldehyde 3a in a ratio of 31:69 (Table 1, entry
1) at 41% conversion.12 Since the R-oxidase activity of this
crude homogenate (grown for 14 days, Method A) was quite
low and the optically active (R)-2-hydroxy acids 2 only
accessible on the analytical scale, the crude enzyme extract of
germinating peas (germinated for 3 days, Method B) was
employed.
The results in Table 1 (entries 2 and 3) show that this enzyme
preparation exhibits a significantly higher R-oxidase activity
toward fatty acid 1a. Nevertheless, to achieve its complete
conversion to the 2-hydroxy acid 2a, the reaction conditions
had to be optimized for this model substrate (cf. Supporting
Information, Table 2). Since the R oxidation is known6,13 to
proceed through a 2-hydroperoxy acid intermediate (Scheme
1), reaction conditions which favor the reduction over decar-
boxylation were required to increase the yield of the 2-hydroxy
acid. Several reducing additives were tried out for this purpose.
While cysteine or the glutathione peroxidase (GPX)/glutathione
(GSH) system did not help, fortunately, the R oxidation yielded
exclusively the 2-hydroxy acid 2a in the presence of tin(II)
chloride, which was successfully utilized in the in-situ reduction
of fatty acid hydroperoxides formed by lipoxygenase-catalyzed
autoxidation.14 Under optimized reaction conditions, the myris-
tic acid (1a) was completely converted to the enantiomerically
pure (R)-2-hydroxy acid 2a (Table 1, entry 2). These results
demonstrate that the R oxidase of pea autoxidizes selectively
the C-HR bond of the prochiral R methylenic group in
carboxylic acids (Scheme 3). Thus, the observed enantiose-
Figure 1. Product distribution, determined by GC analysis, for the R
oxidation of myristic acid (1a) with the crude extract of germinating
peas.
lectivity of the R oxidation does not originate from the
asymmetric reduction of the intermediary hydroperoxy acid
through peroxidase activity in the crude homogenate of germi-
nating peas.
Unquestionably, a significant step forward was accomplished
in developing this asymmetric R oxidation of long-chain
carboxylic acids into a useful preparative synthesis of optically
active 2-hydroxy acids. Indeed, to illustrate the synthetic value
of this novel biotechnological methodology, this R oxidation
was conducted on 0.5 mmol (100 mg) of the fatty acid 1a (Table
1, entry 3; cf. Supporting Information, Table 2). After about 3
days of reaction time, the resulting 2-hydroxymyristic acid (2a)
was obtained enantiomerically pure and isolated in 46% yield.
The homologous aldehyde 3a was formed as the minor pro-
duct, which was transformed at long reaction times (3 days) by
oxido reductases in the crude homogenate to the corresponding
alcohol 4a and carboxylic acid 5a, as confirmed by GC analysis
(Figure 1).
Also the 12-thiamyristic (1r) and 9-thiapalmitic (1s) acids
were treated with the crude extract of germinating peas (Table
1, entries 13-15) to examine whether such thioether functional-
ity survives in view of its ease of sulfoxidation.15 Amazingly,
on the analytical scale, these thia-substituted acids were
exclusively and completely converted to the enantiomerically
pure (R)-2-hydroxy acids 2r and 2s (entries 13 and 15). In fact,
this R oxidation of the 12-thiamyristic acid (1r) on the
semipreparative scale (ca. 50 mg, 0.2 mmol) yielded preferen-
tially the enantiomerically pure 2-hydroxy acid 2r at 100%
conversion (entry 14); not even traces of sulfoxidation were
noted.
The enantiomeric excess of the 2-hydroxy acids 2 was
determined by gas chromatography on chiral columns after
esterification of their methyl esters with either (+)-R-methoxy-
R-(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetyl chloride (Mosher reagent)16 or
(-)-menthyl chloroformate.17 The elution order of the diaster-
eomeric derivatives of the 2-hydroxy acids 2a,d,i,j,o,q was
ascertained on an achiral stationary phase by comparing the gas-
chromatographic data with that of the authentic reference
compounds.11e,18,19 The configurations of the 2-hydroxy acids
2b,g,h,m were assigned accordingly. For the determination of
the configuration of the 2-hydroxy-12-thiamyristic acid (2r),
we have employed the exciton-coupled-circular-dichroism (EC-
(15) Kagan, H. B. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed.;
VCH Publishers: New York, 1993; pp 203-226.
(16) Dale, J. A.; Dull, D. L.; Mosher, H. S. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34,
2543-2549.
(17) Rees, L.; Suckling, C. J.; Wood, H. C. S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1987, 470-472.
(18) Adam, W.; Lazarus, M.; Schmerder, A.; Humpf, H.-U.; Saha-Mo¨ller,
C. R.; Schreier, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2013-2018.
(19) Hamberg, M. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 43, 515-526.
(13) Kajiwara, T.; Matsui, K.; Akakabe, Y. In Biotechnology for
ImproVed Foods and FlaVours; Takeoaka, G. R., Teranishi, R., Williams,
P. J., Kobayashi, A., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, 1996;
pp 146-166.
(14) Koljak, R.; Boutaud, O.; Shieh, B.-H.; Samel, N.; Brash, A. R.
Science 1997, 277, 1994-1996.