K. Oisaki et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 4325–4329
4329
shima, Y.; Kanai, M.; Du, W.; Curran, D. P.; Shibasaki,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9908–9909; (c) Tian,
S.-K.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6195–6196;
(d) Tian, S.-K.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
9900–9901; (e) Deng, H.; Isler, M. P.; Snapper, M. L.;
Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1009–
1012. For other examples, see references cited therein.
11. (a) Guillen, F.; Fiaud, J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
2939–2942; (b) Guillen, F.; Rivard, M.; Toffano, M.;
Legros, J.-Y.; Daran, J.-C.; Fiaud, J.-C. Tetrahedron 2002,
58, 5895–5904; (c) Pilkington, C. J.; Zanotti-Gerosa, A.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1273–1275.
12. There was no significant difference in reactivity between
catalysts coordinated by a monodentate phosphine and a
bidentate phosphine.
´
3. For practical examples, (a) see: Garcıa, C.; LaRochelle, L.
K.; Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10970–
10971; (b) Yus, M.; Ramon, D. J.; Prieto, O. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1103–1114; (c) Jeon, S.-J.; Walsh, P.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9544–9545; (d) Li, H.;
Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6538–6539; (e)
13. A triphenylphosphine-free catalyst generated via in situ
reduction of CuF2Æ2H2O with the chiral bidentate phos-
phine (see Ref. 4) produced the same enantioselectivity as
the catalyst prepared by simply mixing CuFÆ3PPh3Æ2EtOH
and 5l. Therefore, the competitive coordination of triphen-
ylphosphine to generate achiral CuF was negligible when
5l was used as a chiral ligand.
´
Betancort, J. M.; Garcıa, C.; Walsh, P. J. Synlett 2004,
749–760. For other examples, see references cited therein.
4. For a practical example, see: Wada, R.; Oisaki, K.; Kanai,
M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8910–
8911. For other examples, see references cited therein.
5. Denmark, S. E.; Fan, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
4233–4235.
6. Oisaki, K.; Suto, Y.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5644–5645.
7. For metal fluoride-catalyzed asymmetric aldol reactions to
14. Representative spectroscopic data of 5l: 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) d: 1.46–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.85–1.95 (m,
2H), 2.00–2.08 (m, 2H), 2.18–2.28 (m, 2H), 2.35–2.45
(m, 2H), 2.50–2.60 (m, 2H), 3.23–3.31 (m, 2H), 3.65–3.75
(m, 2H), 5.15–5.21 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.34 (m, 20H); 13C NMR
(126 MHz, CDCl3) d: 23.93, 24.13, 31.63, 37.50, 46.39,
46.49, 48.46, 48.57, 125.55, 125.63, 125.67, 127.27, 127.81,
127.85, 127.88, 128.30, 128.32, 138.88, 144.83; 31P NMR
(202 MHz, CDCl3) d: 12.0 (s).
15. General procedure for catalytic enantioselective aldol
reaction to ketones: A solution of CuFÆ3PPh3Æ2EtOH
(9.6 mg, 0.010 mmol, 2.5 mol %) and chiral phosphine
ligand (0.020 mmol, 5 mol %) in degassed DME (0.6 mL)
was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. To this
solution, ketone (0.40 mmol) and (EtO)3SiF (0.48 mmol,
1.2 equiv) were added at room temperature and stirred for
15 min. Ketene silyl acetal 2 (0.80 mmol, 2 equiv) was then
added at 0–4 °C, and the mixture was stirred for the
indicated period shown in Table 1. 3HFÆEt3N (0.3 mL)
was added to quench the reaction, and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 30 min. After the addition
of satd NaCl, the product was extracted with AcOEt, and
the combined organic layer was washed with brine. Drying
with Na2SO4, filtration, concentration, and purification by
silica gel column chromatography (AcOEt/hexane) gave
the aldol product.
aldehydes, see: (a) Kruger, J.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am.
¨
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 867–868; (b) Pagenkopf, B. L.;
Kruger, J.; Stojanovic, A.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem.,
¨
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3124–3126; (c) Yanagisawa, A.; Nakat-
suka, Y.; Asakawa, K.; Kageyama, H.; Yamamoto, H.
Synlett 2001, 69–72; (d) Yanagisawa, A.; Nakatsuka, Y.;
Asakawa, K.; Wadamoto, M.; Kageyama, H.; Yama-
moto, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 74, 1477–1484; (e)
Wadamoto, M.; Ozasa, N.; Yanagisawa, A.; Yamamoto,
H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5593–5601.
8. The following experimental results support these ideas. (1)
The enantioselectivity was independent of the alkoxide
substituents of the silicon atom. Both ketene triethoxysilyl
acetal and ketene trimethoxysilyl acetal produced the same
enantioselectivity, which suggested that the silicon is not
relevant to the enantio-differentiation step (aldol addition
to substrate ketones). (2) The order dependencies of the
initial reaction rate on [ketone], [catalyst], and [silyl
enolate] were determined to be 0, 1.5, and –0.8, respec-
tively, which indicated that the addition step is not the
rate-determining step (see Ref. 6).
16. The previous best result for aliphatic ketones was
only 35% ee from 4-phenylbutan-2-one in Denmarkꢀs
catalysis.
9. Chiral amine ligands such as pybox and salen, and
monophosphines such as MOP and Feringaꢀs phospho-
ramidite produced only very low reactivity and/or no
enantioselectivity.
10. Both E- and Z-silyl enolates produced the syn-isomer with
low diastereoselectivity (syn:anti = 1.6:1), which suggested
a linear transition state (see Ref. 6).
17. Other ketene silyl acetals than 2 can be utilized for the
present catalytic enantioselective aldol reaction to ketones.
The enantio-induction at the a-position was much more
efficient (up to 90% ee was obtained using tol-BINAP;
unpublished result) than the tertiary alcohol construction
at the b-position. See Ref. 6 for preliminary results of this
type of asymmetric reaction.