.
Angewandte
Communications
À
derivatives (Figure 1c). Furthermore, with recent advances in
stereoretentive or stereoinvertive B-alkyl Suzuki–Miyaura
cross-coupling[8] and the precedent of stereospecific coupling
of cyclopropylboronic acids (or esters),[9] we expected chiral
aminocyclopropylboronic esters to be valuable substrates for
conversion into various ACPAs through coupling chemistry.
Thus herein we report a new ACPA synthesis which permits
not only a significant reduction in the number of steps
required for making ACPA derivatives (n + 1 steps for
n derivatives), but also the production of either isomer (cis
or trans) by slightly changing the atmosphere in the coupling
stage (Figure 1c).
propane C H borylation (steric-controlled, trans-selec-
tive).[11] This outcome clearly indicates that the pivaloylamide
À
group on 1 functions as a directing group during the C H
activation step.[12] It should be noted that the group of
Sawamura recently reported a heteroatom-directed cis-selec-
À
tive C H borylation of cyclopropanes by silica-supported
monophosphine iridium catalysts.[13]
Possible modes of action for the pivaloylamide directing
effect might be worth mentioning. Given that most ortho-
À
directed C H borylations require an iridium (or rhodium)
center to have two accessible coordination sites and that
phenanthroline ligands are unsuitable for providing them, we
assume that the pivaloylamide group was interacting with
a boryl ligand on iridium either by coordination of Lewis basic
Our first goal was to find appropriate conditions for the
3
À
stereoselective C(sp ) H borylation of cyclopropylamines.
À
Although cyclopropanes have been rarely investigated in C
atom (O or N) to boron[14] or by hydrogen bonding of the
H borylation chemistry,[10] Hartwig recently reported a trans-
acidic proton (N H) to the pinacolboryl oxygen atom.
[15]
À
À
selective C H borylation of cyclopropanes catalyzed by
Based on this auspicious result, we optimized the reaction
conditions using 1a as a substrate (Table 1). When 4,4’-di-tert-
butylpyridine (4,4’-dibpy) was used as the ligand instead of
2,9-Me2phen, the yield of 2a increased slightly (entry 2).
Changing the ligand to 3,4,7,8-tetramethylphenanthroline
(3,4,7,8-Me4phen)[11,16] provided the best result, thus giving
2a in 31% yield (entry 3). Interestingly, when the amount of
both iridium and ligand were decreased from 2.5 mol% to
0.5 mol%, the yield of 2a increased to 43% (entry 4). The use
of HBpin instead of B2pin2 resulted in a similar yield of 2a
(entry 5). We also found that the amount of iridium and
ligand are critically important for the reaction efficiency.
Thus, with 0.5 mol% of [{Ir(OMe)(cod)}2]/3,4,7,8-Me4phen
catalyst, 1a (7.1 mmol) reacted with HBpin (1.5 equiv) to give
2a in 85% yield as determined by NMR spectroscopy (62%
yield upon isolation).[17,18] Interestingly, under these reaction
[{Ir(OMe)(cod)}2] and 2,9-dimethylphenanthroline (2,9-
Me2phen).[11] However, in early experiments, we found that
simple application of this catalyst system to the reaction of
unprotected cyclopropylamine and bis(pinacolato)diboron
À
(B2pin2) did not lead to the C H borylation product at all.
After extensive screening of N substituents on the cyclo-
propylamine unit, we determined that N-cyclopropylpivala-
mide (1a) was a viable substrate. For example, the treatment
of 1a (1.0 equiv) and B2pin2 (0.5 equiv) in the presence of
[{Ir(OMe)(cod)}2] (2.5 mol%) and 2,9-Me2phen (10 mol%)
À
in cyclohexane at 708C furnished the C H borylation product
2a in 6% yield with most of starting material remaining intact
À
(Table 1, entry 1). Very interestingly, we found that the C H
borylation proceeded in a cis-selective manner, which is
opposite to the finding of Liskey and Hartwig for cyclo-
À
conditions employing excess amounts of HBpin, a double C
H borylation product was observed only in a trace amounts.
À
We also conducted C H borylation of the cyclopropyl-
À
Table 1: Iridium-catalyzed cis-selective C H borylation of the cyclopro-
pylamine 1a.[a]
amines 1b–j with various substituents (see the Supporting
Information for details). The pivaloyl group is by far the best
N substituent in this particular reaction. Although there exist
À
other protecting groups providing C H borylation products
to some extent [e.g., N-cyclopropylisobutyramide (1b) and N-
cyclopropyl-2,2,2-trifluoroacetamide (1e)], careful optimiza-
tion will be needed to achieve a synthetically useful level of
Entry
Boron reagent
(equiv)
x (mol%)
Ligand
Yield [%][b]
À
efficiency. We also found that the C H borylation of the n-
1
2
3
4
5
6
B2pin2 (0.5)
B2pin2 (0.5)
B2pin2 (0.5)
B2pin2 (0.5)
HBpin (1.0)
HBpin (1.5)
HBpin (1.5)
HBpin (1.5)
HBpin (1.5)
2.5
2.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2,9-Me2phen
4,4’-dibpy
6
15
31
43
49
61
67
propyl-substituted cyclopropylamide 1j proceeded in a regio-
and stereoselective manner, albeit with low reaction effi-
ciency [23% yield upon isolation; Eq. (1)]. Judging from
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
3,4,7,8-Me4phen
7[c]
8[d]
9[c,e]
19
85 (62)[f]
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (1.6 mmol, 1.0 equiv), boron reagent, [{Ir-
(OMe)(cod)}2] (x mol%), ligand (2x mol%), cyclohexane, 708C, 18 h.
[b] Yield of 2a based on 1a, as determined by NMR analysis. [c] The
reaction was conducted at 808C. [d] THF was used as solvent. [e] 1a
(7.1 mmol) was used. [f] Yield of isolated product.
B2pin2 =bis(pinacolato)diboron, cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene, HBpin=pi-
nacolborane, 2,9-Me2phen=2,9-dimethylphenanthroline, 4,4’-
dibpy=4,4’-di-tert-butylpyridine, 3,4,7,8-Me4phen=3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-
phenanthroline.
NOE experiments, the boryl group was introduced cis to the
amide group and trans to the n-propyl group. As the present
study is directed towards the development of LSD1 inhibitors
having cyclopropylamine moiety with one aryl substituent on
the cyclopropyl ring,[2c,d] substituted cyclopropanes are
beyond the scope of this paper.
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 7
These are not the final page numbers!