S. Itadani et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 7777–7780
7779
Res. 1988, 474, 386–389; (c) Ishida, M.; Shinozaki, H. Br.
J. Pharmacol. 1991, 104, 873–878.
4. (a) Hashimoto, K.; Horikawa, M.; Shirahama, H. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7047–7050; (b) Hashimoto, K.;
Shirahama, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2625–2628; (c)
Horikawa, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Shirahama, H. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1993, 34, 331–334; (d) Horikawa, M.; Shira-
hama, H. Synlett 1996, 95–96; (e) Kamabe, M.;
Miyazaki, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Shirahama, H. Heterocy-
cles 2002, 56, 105–111.
5. (a) Shirahama, H. In Organic Synthesis in Japan, Past,
Present, and Future; Noyori, R., Ed. Principles of a
poisonous mushroom working as neurotransmitters. A
dynamic aspect of natural product chemistry; Tokyo
Kagaku Dozin: Tokyo, 1992; pp. 373–384; (b) Hashi-
moto, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Nakamura, K.; Ohwada, S.;
Ohuchi, T.; Horikawa, M.; Konno, K.; Shirahama, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 1373–1379.
Figure 2.
radical species, [C] and [D]. The radical [D] cyclizes to
[E]. The radical [E] then gets an electron from [C] to
produce [F] which abstracts a proton probably from [G]
to produce [H]. These types of radical cyclizations
usually produce a cis-substituted five-membered ring,
which is explained by the transition state bearing the
equatorial substituents at the two carbons of the partly
formed bond (Fig. 2).13
In the case of 10, the product ratio was 98:2 in benzene
solution giving the cis-isomer as the major product for
which the above explanation should be applicable. The
photoreaction of the same amide 10 in acetonitrile
produced a mixture of 1:1 stereoisomers. The anion [F]
would be more stable in acetonitrile than in benzene
because of the solvent polarity; therefore, the anion [F]
would equilibrate with [I] before abstracting a proton
from [G], resulting in the production of the mixture.
6. Ohfune, Y.; Kurokawa, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
1071–1074.
7. (a) Wagner, P. J.; Leavitt, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970,
92, 5806–5808; (b) Wagner, P. J.; Leavitt, R. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 3669–3677; (c) Wagner, P. J.;
Puchalski, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 5948–5949;
(d) Wagner, P. J.; Puchalski, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 6177–6178.
8. Itadani, S.; Hashimoto, K.; Shirahama, H. Heterocycles
1998, 49, 105–108.
On the other hand, in the case of 7, the cyclization
reactions in both acetonitrile and benzene produce cis-
and trans-isomers in a ratio of 1:1. The stereoselectivity
might be attributable to the stability of the anion [F] of
the ester independent of the solvent.
In the THF ring cyclization, the photoreaction smoothly
proceeded without salt. This might be due to the desir-
able conformation of the starting ether for the cycliza-
tion, which resulted in faster cyclization. On the other
hand, the amide derivative contained a nitrogen with sp2
hybridization, which might be disadvantage to adopt the
suitable conformation for the cyclization. Accordingly,
the amide derivative fell into equilibration between [A]
and [D]. The salt added might prevent [D] to [A] by some
effects (cf. Ref. 9), which promotes further cyclization.
In the ether series, the major product had 3,4-trans
configuration. This might be attributable to the structure
of the radical acceptor, i.e. ester, and also the solvent
used, i.e. acetonitrile.
Comparing the stability of the anions [F] of the ester
and of the amide, the latter must be rather destabilized
by the resonance effect of the nitrogen.
In addition, the cyclized cis-isomers could not be con-
verted into the corresponding trans-isomers and vice
versa under our photoreaction conditions by the
epimerization at the benzylic position through the radi-
cal intermediate [J].14
9. The role of KF and TBAF (salt effect) might be either or
some of the followings: (i) stabilization of radical ion pair
(exciplex) (ii) inhibition of back electron transfer ([D] to
[A]) (iii) acceleration of charge separation. See: Santa-
maria, J. In Photoinduced Electron Transfer; Fox, M. A.;
Chanon, M., Eds. Solvent and salt effects. Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 1988; Chapter 3.1, pp. 483–540.
References
1. (a) Konno, K.; Shirahama, H.; Matsumoto, T. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1983, 24, 939–942; (b) Konno, K.; Hashi-
moto, K.; Ohfune, Y.; Shirahama, H.; Matsumoto, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 607–610; (c) Hashimoto, K.;
Konno, K.; Shirahama, H.; Matsumoto, T. Chem. Lett.
1986, 1399–1400; (d) Konno, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Ohfune,
Y.; Shirahama, H.; Matsumoto, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 4807–4815.
2. For recent reviews on excitatory amino acids, see: (a)
Moloney, M. G. Nat. Prod. Rep., 1998, 15, 205–219; (b)
Moloney, M. G. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1999, 16, 485–498; (c)
Braeuner-Osborne, H.; Egebjerg, J.; Nielsen, E. Ø.; Mad-
sen, U.; Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43,
2609–2645.
We tried some salts in the photoreaction, such as, KBr,
LiCl, and LiBr. However, no effect was observed for
these salts in the photoreaction. Accordingly, the desir-
able effect in the reaction probably arose from the
fluoride ion. The salt effect was well documented for
organic compounds and some inorganic compounds,
such as, LiClO4, Mg(ClO4)2, and Bu4NClO4. The effects
of fluoride ion to this kind of organic synthesis would be
the first example. Fluoride-promoted dye-sensitized pho-
tooxidation was reported by Wasserman; however, the
role of the fluoride ion seemed to be different from that
of our reaction. See Wasserman, H. H.; Pickett, J. E. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4695–4696.
3. (a) Shinozaki, H.; Ishida, M.; Okamoto, T. Brain Res.
1986, 399, 395–398; (b) Ishida, M.; Shinozaki, H. Brain