4840 Organometallics, Vol. 22, No. 24, 2003
Communications
Sch em e 1
Sch em e 2
Scheme 1).10 It is important that care be taken to
completely remove the original THF solvent before the
reaction mixture is hydrolyzed.10 Otherwise, a polymeric
material will result. It should also be noted that, while
the purified ligand precursor 2 is a yellow solid, the
impure product is a dark green residue. However, the
spectroscopic and analytical data are all consistent with
the formulation of 2, given in Scheme 1. The constrained-
geometry titanium complex [1-(σ-S)-2-(η5-C5H4CH(Ph))-
1,2-C2B10H10)]Ti(NMe2)2 (3) could be obtained in 83%
yield from the reaction of 2 with Ti(NMe2)4 in toluene
via an amine elimination reaction (see Scheme 2).11
While the reactivity of 3 toward excess Me3SiCl results
in the formation of [1-(σ-S)-2-(η5-C5H4CH(Ph))-1,2-
C2B10H10)]TiCl(NMe2) (4) in 71% yield,12 with 2 equiv
of Me3NHCl the yield of 4 is only 41% (see Scheme 3).13
In neither case was there evidence for the dichlorination
of the titanium.
Several other η1 group 16 atom appended with
η5-Cp complexed organometallic species have been
synthesized and their structures determined. The (sp2-
C1)-bridged Cp/oxido-titanium complex {Cp-C(dCH2)-
8
O-Zr(NEt2)2}2 was found to be a dimer, as were
[η5:σ-C5H4Si(Me)2-O-TiCl2]214 and {[η5:σ-C5H4(CH2)2O]-
TiCl2}2.6b However, the dimers have quite different
structures, in that each oxygen of the latter species
formed a bridge between two titanium atoms, while the
first two compounds are not constrained within the
single unit; instead, the oxygens were bonded to one
neighboring titanium in the dimeric structure. On the
other hand, [η5:σ-C5H4(CH2)3O]TiCl2 was found to be
monomeric.6b Since analysis and NMR data could not
rule out the possibility that 3 could exist as a dimer,
the unambiguous structure of compound 3 was deter-
mined by X-ray diffraction studies.15 The ORTEP draw-
(10) Syn th esis of 2. A 1.00 g (5.68 mmol) sample of closo-1-SH-
1,2-C2B10H11 (1) in 40 mL of dry THF was charged into a 100 mL
Schlenk flask. To this flask was added 4.55 mL of nBuLi (11.40 mmol,
2.5 M in hexanes) dropwise with stirring at -78 °C. The reaction
mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 12 h, during
which time a white precipitate formed. The mixture was then cooled
to -78 °C again, and a 10 mL THF solution of 6-phenylfulvene (0.88
g, 5.68 mmol) was added dropwise over a 10 min interval. The resulting
reaction mixture was then warmed to room temperature and stirred
overnight, during which time the suspension mixture became a clear
orange solution. The solvents from the reaction mixture were removed
in vacuo, and the remaining solid was dried in vacuo for 5 h to remove
any remaining THF. The solid was then redissolved in 100 mL of water,
and to this solution was added 10 mL of concentrated HCl was added
up to pH 1. The solution was extracted by 100 mL of CH2Cl2, and the
organic layer was separated and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After
complete removal of the solvent, a dark green solid was obtained. The
solid was further purified by column chromatography using CH2Cl2
as the mobile phase to give a yellow solid, identified as 1-thiol-2-
[cyclopentadienylmethyl(phenyl)]-1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaborane(12)
(2; 1-SH-2-[HCpCH(Ph)]-closo-1,2-C2B10H10), in 85% yield (1.60 g,
4.83 mmol). Anal. Calcd (found) for C14B10H22S (2): C, 50.88 (50.70);
H, 6.71 (6.72). NMR data for compound 2: 1H NMR (CDCl3, external
Me4Si) δ 2.93-3.34 (2H, m, CH2 in C5H5), 3.78 (1H, s, SH), 5.05 (1H,
s, br, Ph(CH)), 6.40-6.62 (4H, m, CdCH in C5H5), 6.94-7.52 (5H, m,
C6H5); 13C NMR (CDCl3, external Me4Si) δ 40.7, 42.1 (CH2 in C5H5),
51.7, 52.5 (Ph(CH)), 85.3 (PhCCcage), 86.3 (CcageSH), 83.52 (Ph-Ccage),
127.8-134.8 (CdCH in C5H5), 129.7-146.3 (C6H5); 11B NMR (CDCl3,
relative to external BF3‚OEt2) δ -2.06, -4.54, -7.01, -10.03, -11.29
(d (br, overlapping), BH’s, 1J (11B-1H) unresolved). IR (cm-1, KBr
cell): 3134 (br, s), 3052 (s, m), 3021 (s, m), 2960 (s, s), 2919 (s, s), 2863
(s, m), 2847 (s, s), 2582 (br, s), 1618 (s, w), 1398 (s, s), 1255 (s, s), 1117
(s, s), 1071 (s, s), 1024 (s, w), 794 (s, w), 702 (s, s).
(11) Syn th esis of 3. To a toluene (30 mL) solution of 2 (0.37 g, 1.12
mmol) was added a toluene (10 mL) solution of Ti(NMe2)4 (0.25 g, 1.12
mmol) at -78 °C. The resulting mixture was slowly warmed to room
temperature and stirred for 24 h at this temperature until it turned
to a red solution. After removal of small amounts of solid by filtration,
the solvent from the clear filtrate was removed in vacuo, to collect a
dark red residue. This residue was further purified repeatedly by
washing with hexanes to give the corresponding titanium complex
[1-(σ-S)-2-(η5-C5H4CH(Ph))-1,2-C2B10H10)]Ti(NMe2)2 (3) in 83% yield
(0.43 g, 0.93 mmol). Anal. Calcd (found) for C18H32B10N2STi (3): C,
46.54 (46.70); H, 6.94 (6.72). NMR data for compound 3: 1H NMR
(C6D6, external Me4Si) δ 2.87, 3.29 (12H, s, N(CH3)2), 5.34 (1H, s,
PhCH), 5.71 (2H, m, C5H4), 6.22 (2H, m, C5H4), 7.14-7.43 (5H, m,
C6H5); 13C NMR (C6D6, external Me4Si) δ 48.7, 49.7 (N(CH3)2), 54.7
(PhCH), 81.3 (Ph-Ccage), 83.1 (CcageSH), 109.5, 113.7, 114.9, 116.2
(C5H4), 127.5-139.8 (C6H5); 11B NMR (C6D6, relative to external BF3‚
OEt2) δ -4.86 (d, BH, 1J (11B-1H) ) 129 Hz), -6.19 (d, 1J (11B-1H) )
133 Hz), 11.6 (d, 1J (11B-1H) ) 117 Hz). IR (cm-1, KBr cell, in C6D6):
3401 (s, w), 2958 (s, s), 2920 (s, s), 2845 (s, m), 2566 (vs, br), 1635 (m,
s), 1465 (s, s), 1399 (s, s), 1380 (s, s), 1260 (s, s), 1097 (s, s), 1020 (s, s),
801 (vs, s), 705 (m, s).
(12) Syn th esis of 4 by r ea ction w ith Me3SiCl. To a toluene (30
mL) solution of 3 (0.30 g, 0.65 mmol) was added 0.85 mL (6.5 mmol)
Me3SiCl at -78 °C. The resulting solution was warmed to room
temperature slowly and stirred overnight at this temperature to give
a red solution. The solvents along with excess Me3SiCl were pumped
off, leaving a red solid, which was washed with n-hexane. Then the
solid was recrystallized from toluene to give 4 as red microcrystals in
71% yield (0.21 g, 0.46 mmol). Anal. Calcd (found) for C16H26B10ClNSTi
(4): C, 42.15 (42.40); H, 5.75 (5.72). NMR data for compound 4: 1H
NMR (C6D6, external Me4Si) δ 3.20 (6H, s, N(CH3)2), 5.04 (1H, s,
PhCH), 5.16, 5.54, 6.02, 6.41 (1H, s, C5H4), 7.12-7.27 (5H, m, C6H5);
13C NMR (C6D6, external Me4Si) δ 51.5, 54.7 (PhCH), 78.6 (PhCH-
C
cage), 83.9 (Ccage-SH), 115.1, 118.0, 118.1, 119.7 (C5H4), 125.4-138.6
(C6H5); 11B NMR (C6D6, relative to external BF3‚OEt2) δ -4.54, -10.21.
IR (cm-1, KBr cell, in C6D6): 2958 (s, s), 2920 (s, s), 2611 (m, s), 2588
(m, s), 2571 (m, s), 2555 (m, s), 1400 (s, s), 1262 (s, s), 1099 (vs, br),
1019 (s, s), 798 (vs, s), 730 (m, s), 705 (m, s).
(13) Syn th esis of 4 by r ea ction w ith Me3NHCl. To a toluene (30
mL) solution of 3 (0.30 g, 0.65 mmol) was added a dry powder of Me3-
NHCl (0.62 g, 1.30 mmol) incrementally at -78 °C. The resulting
solution was stirred at 0 °C over a period of several hours and then
slowly warmed to room temperature and stirred further overnight at
this temperature to give a red solution. The solvents from the reaction
mixture were pumped off, leaving a red solid, which was washed with
n-hexane. The solid was then recrystallized from a toluene and hexane
mixture to give red microcrystals, identified as 4, in 41% yield.
(14) Ciruelos, S.; Cuenca, T.; Go´mez-Sal, P.; Manzanero, A.; Royo,
P. Organometallics 1995, 14, 177-185.
(15) X-ray data for 3 (C18H32B10N2STi; fw, 464.52; P1h). Data were
collected at 173 (2) K on a Bruker SMART CCD PLATFORM diffrac-
tometer with a ) 10.446(2) Å, b ) 11.849(2) Å, c ) 12.280 (2) Å, R )
114.864(3)°, â ) 111.230(3)°, γ ) 91.970(4)°, V ) 1253.8 (4) Å3, Z ) 2,
and Dcalcd ) 1.230 g cm-3. Of the 6261 reflections collected (2θ ) 3.88-
50°), 4232 reflections were respectively considered as observed (I >
2σ(I)) and were corrected for Lorentz, polarization, and absorption
effects (Sheldrick, G, M, SADABS, Program for Empirical Absorption
Correction of Area Detector Data; University of Go¨ttingen, Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 1996). The structure was solved by direct methods and
refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques using SHELXTL
(Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL, Version 5.1; Bruker Analytical X-ray
Systems, Madison, WI, 1997). All non-H atoms were refined anisotro-
pically. The final refinements converged at R1 ) 0.0618, wR2 ) 0.1305,
and GOF ) 1.378.