Triphenylene has become the most widely studied scaffold
for discotic liquid crystals.6 Its core, like most discotic liquid
crystals, is generally flat, rigid and aromatic and is sur-
rounded by flexible peripheral side chains. Synthetic ad-
vances over recent years have permitted investigation of a
wide range of symmetrical (hexasubstituted) and unsym-
metrically substituted derivatives.6-9 These structures often
form columnar mesophases with beneficial macroscopic
molecular orientation. To improve their processability and
functionality, twinned and oligomeric structures have re-
ceived particular attention. It is found that columnar me-
sophase formation is favored if the individual discotic units
are joined by a flexible spacer of appropriate length and
composition.10 Rigid spacers can lead to formation of
nematic phases.11
In this paper we report the synthesis and properties of
discotic triphenylenes linked through a crown ether. Our first
targets were ditriphenyleno-18-crown-6 derivatives 2 (Figure
1).12 The supramolecular properties of crown ethers are well-
known and we envisaged that incorporation of the crown
structure could conceivably contribute to enhanced columnar
order.13-15 The crown ether linked structure itself presents
an unusual motif for interrogation of structural features
controlling mesophase formation in triphenylene discotics.
In addition, the crown ether linking group can potentially
offer the new twinned materials a further functionality or
property via a combination of electron and ionic conductivity
within one framework if an extended columnar alignment
can be achieved. The corresponding “open” bisterphenyl-
18-crown-6 derivatives 1 are known16 and present a non-
planar (with respect to the cores) molecular structure. These
materials are reported to show columnar phases and are more
accurately described as polycatenar materials17 rather than
discotics. As such, although interesting in their own right,
they are unlikely to offer favorable properties for optoelec-
tronic applications because they lack extended π-systems.
Figure 1. Typical hexaalkoxytriphenylenes (HATn), the hexagonal
columnar mesophase, polycatenar bisterphenyl-18-crown-6 (1) and
target ditriphenyleno-18-crown-6 (2).
The synthesis of unsymmetrically substituted triphenylenes
can be readily achieved through direct oxidative coupling
between suitably substituted biphenyl and benzene deriva-
tives.7 This protocol was developed, and is most suitable,
for synthesis of differentially substituted hexaalkoxytriph-
enylenes, which is the key structural motif present in target
ditriphenyleno-18-crown-6 2. Tetraalkoxybiphenyl 3 (R )
n-hexyl) (Scheme 1) was most conveniently prepared using
(6) (a) Kumar, S. Liq. Cryst. 2004, 31, 1037–1059. (b) Kumar, S. Liq.
Cryst. 2005, 32, 1089
.
(7) (a) Boden, N.; Borner, R. C.; Bushby, R. J.; Cammidge, A. N.;
Jesudason, M. V. Liq. Cryst. 1993, 15, 851–858. (b) Boden, N.; Bushby,
R. J.; Cammidge, A. N. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 465. (c)
Boden, N.; Bushby, R. J.; Cammidge, A. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
Scheme 1
. Attempted Synthesis using Oxidative
Biphenyl-Benzene Coupling
924
(8) Cammidge, A. N.; Gopee, H. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 2773
(9) Cammidge, A. N. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2006, 364, 2697
.
.
.
(10) (a) Boden, N.; Bushby, R. J.; Cammidge, A. N.; Martin, P. S. J.
Mater. Chem. 1995, 5, 1857. (b) Boden, N.; Bushby, R. J.; Cammidge,
A. N.; El-Mansoury, A.; Martin, P. S.; Lu, Z. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9,
1391.
(11) Kumar, S.; Varshney, S. K. Org. Lett. 2002, 157.
(12) (a) Lehn, J. M. Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 91. (b) Lehn, J. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1988, 27, 89. (c) Cram, D. J. Angew. Chem. 1988, 100,
1041. (d) Cram, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1988, 27, 1009. (e) Pedersen,
C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1988, 27, 1021. (f) Pedersen, C. J. Angew.
Chem. 1988, 100, 1053. (g) Bandyopadhyay, D. Reonance 2001, 6, 71. (h)
Pedersen, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 7017.
Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling.18 Oxidative coupling was
attempted using iron(III) chloride under the usual conditions
(dichloromethane, room temperature followed by reductive
methanol workup).
(13) Simpson, C. D.; Wu, J.; Watson, M. D.; Mu¨llen, K. J. Mater. Chem.
2004, 14, 494
.
(14) Sirringhaus, H.; Brown, P. J.; Friend, R. H.; Nielsen, M. M.;
Bechgaard, K.; Langeveld-Voss, B. M. W.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Janssen,
R. A. J. Nature 1999, 401, 685
.
(15) Guillon, D. Struct. Bonding 1999, 95, 41
.
(16) Schultz, A.; Laschat, S.; Saipa, A.; Gieꢀelmann, F.; Nimtz, M.;
Schulte, J. L.; Baro, A.; Miehlich, B. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 163.
(17) Gharbia, M.; Gharbi, A.; Nguyen, H. T.; Malthete, J. Curr. Opin.
Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 7, 312.
(18) (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457. (b) Kotha,
S.; Kashinath, D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9633. (c) Bellina, F.; Carpita, A.;
Rossi, R. Synthesis 2004, 2419.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010
473