M.C.N. Machado et al. / Thermochimica Acta 328 (1999) 201±207
207
Table 6
References
KCE constants calculated according to expression (2), using the
values of A and E obtained from the TG isothermal and dynamic
experiments
[1] D. Coucouvanis, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 11 (1970) 233.
[2] D. Coucouvanis, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 26 (1979) 301.
[3] G.J. Kerk Van Der, H.L. Klopping, Rev. Trav. Chem. 71
(1952) 1179.
Complexes
a
b
r
Cd(S2CNEt2)2
CdꢀS2CNPrn2
8.84
8.90
8.79
9.34
0.224
0.222
0.218
0.225
0.9998
0.9997
0.9996
0.9999
[4] J.J. Staggerda, J.A. Cras, J. Willense, Rev. Trav. Chim. Pays-
Bas 100 (1981) 41.
2
CdꢀS2CNBun2
2
2
[5] R. West, F.W. Sunderman, Am. J. Med. Soc. 50 (1928)
3106.
CdꢀS2CNBui2
[6] M.A.V.R. Silva, A.M.M.V. Reis, R.I.M.C.P. Farias, J. Chem.
Thermodyn. 27 (1995) 1365.
The kinetic that better model was adjusted to the
experimental data, using the method isothermal was
one-dimensional phase-boundary controlled model
(R1) within the range 0.15ꢂꢁꢂ0.95.
[7] S.C. Dias, M.G.A. Brasilino, C.D. Pinheiro, A.G. Souza,
Thermochim. Acta 241 (1994) 25.
[8] M.A.P. Carvalho, C. Airoldi, A.G. Souza, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. (1992) 1235.
[9] A.G. Souza, J.H. Souza, F. Souza Neto, R.O. Macedo, J.B.L.
Oliveira, J. Thermal. Anal. 49 (1997) 679.
[10] A.G. Souza, C.D. Pinheiro, L.C.R. Santos, M.L.M. Melo,
Thermochim. Acta. 231 (1994) 31.
The thermal analysis data showed that all the four
Cd(S2CNR2)2chelatesdecomposeinasimilarwayinthe
temperature range 528±588 K, according to the same
kinetic model. This result is not surprising owing to the
factthatthestructuralmodi®cationwasintroducedinthe
site far removed from the coordination sphere.
[11] A.W. Coats, J.P. Redfern, Nature 201 (1964) 68.
[12] F. Bonati, R. Ugo, J. Organomet. Chem. 10 (1967) 257.
[13] H. Tanaka, S.C. Ohshima, S. Ichiba, H. Negita, Thermochim.
Acta 48 (1981) 137.
The thermal stability of Cd(S2CNR2)2 complexes,
according the TG curves follows the sequence:
CdꢀS2CNBun2 > CdꢀS2CNPrn2 > CdꢀS2CNBui2
[14] J.D. Handcock, J.H.J. Sharp, J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 55(2)
(1972) 74.
[15] J.H. Sharp, G.W. Brindley, A.B.N. Narahari, J. Am. Ceramic
Soc. 49(1) (1966) 379.
2
2
2
> CdꢀS2CNEt22. The same order of thermal stability
is suggested by the calculated activation apparent
energies in both the isothermal and non-isothermal
experiments.
[16] A.C. Norris, M.I. Poppe, M. Selwood, Thermochim. Acta 41
(1980) 357.
[17] J.M. Criado, M. Gonzalez, A. Ortega, C. Real, J. Thermal.
Anal. 29(2) (1984) 243.
The values of the energy of activation apparently
estimated by dynamic method are larger than that
estimated by isothermal, however obeyed the effect
of the kinetic compensation.
[18] H. Tanaka, S.C. Ohshima, H. Negita, Thermochim. Acta 53
(1982) 387.
[19] N. Koga, H. Tanaka, Thermochim. Acta 209 (1992) 127.
[20] D. Dollimore, Thermochim. Acta 203 (1992) 7.
[21] J.K. Gosh, G.V. Jere, Thermochim. Acta 125 (1988) 51.
[22] J.R. Magee, O.J. Hill, Rev. Anal. Chem. (1985) 5.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank CNPq and CAPES for fellow-
ships and PADCT for ®nancial support.