´
Rogerio da C. Rodrigues et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 5945–5947
5947
9. Kurokawa, M.; Shindo, T.; Suzuki, M.; Nakajima, N.;
Ishihara, K.; Sugai, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14,
1323.
´
10. Li, W.; Ewing, W. R.; Harris, B. D.; Joullie, M. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7659.
the Boc group, by treatment with 4.0 M HCl–EtOAc
was coupled in 85% yield using conditions analogous
to those previously described. No loss of the stereo-
20
chemical integrity was observed {½aꢀ ꢁ64.5 (c 2.0,
D
DCM) (lit.12 ꢁ64.7)} (Scheme 2).13,14
11. (a) Fenical, W.; Vervoort, H.; Epifanio, R. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 782; (b) Liang, B.; Portonovo, P.; Vera,
In summary, a convenient and practical method for the
preparation of amides and esters in good to excellent
yields, from readily available, inexpensive starting mate-
rials has been described.
´
M. D.; Xiao, D.; Joullie, M. M. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1319;
(c) Joullie, M. M.; Portonovo, P.; Liang, B.; Richard, D. J.
´
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9373.
´
12. Jou, G.; Gonzalez, I.; Albericio, F.; Williams, P. L.;
Giralt, E. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 354.
13. Typical experimental procedure (1): To a solution of
triphenylphosphine (1.31 g, 4.99 mmol) and TCICA
(1.16 g, 4.99 mmol) in DCM, 30 mL at 0 °C was added
(0.500 g, 4.99 mmol) (Z)-2-methyl-2-butenoic acid in
portion. The solution was stirred for 45 min, diethylamine
(0.516 mL, 4.99 mmol) was added dropwise followed by
triethylamine (2.00 mL, 14.98 mmol). The ice bath was
removed and the solution was stirred for 1 h. The mixture
was filtered and the organic layer was washed with water
and dried over Na2SO4. The solution was then filtered on
a short column of silica gel with 10% EtOAc/hexanes and
the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo affording 2 in 95%
yield.6 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d 1.13 (6H, t,
J = 7.0 Hz, CH3); 1.59 (3H, dd, J = 7.0, 1.0 Hz, CH3),
1.76 (3H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, CH3); 3.31 (4H, q, J = 7.0 Hz,
CH2); 5.52 (1H, qq, J = 7.0, 1.5 Hz, CH).
14. Typical experimental procedure (2): To a solution of
triphenylphosphine (0.226 g, 0.86 mmol) and TCICA
(0.200 g, 0.86 mmol) in DCM, 4.3 mL at 0 °C was added
dropwise (0.200 g, 0.86 mmol) Boc-L-Leu in DCM,
4.6 mL. The solution was stirred for 30 min. H-Pro-L-
OBnÆHCl was added dropwise followed by triethylamine
(0.360 mL, 2.58 mmol). The ice bath was removed and the
solution was stirred for 2 h. The mixture was filtered and
the organic layer was washed with water and dried over
Na2SO4. The solution was then filtered on a short column
of silica gel with 5–10% EtOAc/hexanes and the filtrate
was concentrated in vacuo affording dipeptide Boc-L-Leu-
L-Pro-OBn in 85% yield.12 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d
0.86 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3); 0.88 (3H, d, J = 6.5, CH3),
1.45 (9H, s, CH3); 1.56–2.45 (6H, m, CH2, CH); 3.50–3.68
(2H, m, CH2); 4.38–4.54 (3H, m, CH2, CH); 5.10 (2H, d,
J = 12.3 Hz, CH2); 5.11 (1H, br, NH); 7.24 (5H, m, CH).
Acknowledgments
Financial support from CNPq and the Analytical Center
(IQ/UFRJ) are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank
Professor Simon John Garden for proofreading this
manuscript.
References and notes
1. (a) Carpino, L. A.; Cohen, B. J.; Stephens, K. E., Jr.;
Sadat-Aalaee, S. Y.; Langridge, D. C. J. Org. Chem. 1986,
51, 3732; (b) Heintzelman, G. R.; Weinreb, S. M.; Parvez,
M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4594; (c) Corbridge, D. E. C.
Phosphorus: An Outline of its Chemistry Biochemistry and
Technology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Science, 1985; pp 97–103.
2. (a) Hrubiec, R. T.; Smith, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49,
431; (b) Kirmse, W.; Kapps, M.; Hager, R. B. Chem. Ber.
1966, 99, 2855; (c) Hooz, J.; Gilani, S. S. H. Can. J. Chem.
1968, 46, 86.
3. Hiegel, G. A.; Ramirez, J.; Barr, R. K. Synth. Commun.
1999, 29, 1415.
4. Jang, D. O.; Park, D. J.; Kim, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 5323.
5. All the compounds gave satisfactory spectral and analyt-
ical data.
6. Naioto, T.; Miyata, O.; Shinada, T.; Ninomiya, I.
Synthesis 1990, 12, 1123.
7. Slatt, J.; Janosik, T.; Wahlstrom, N.; Bergman, J.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2005, 42, 141.
8. A complex mixture was obtained when used malonic acid.