yield. This intermediate was then deprotonated to give bis-
enolates followed by methylation with dimethyl sulfate in a
one-pot procedure to furnish monomer 8.11
for optical absorption of the polymer (422 nm) in CHCl3
was slightly blue-shifted when compared to that of the
monomer (430 nm). On the other hand, the λmax for the
emission of the polymer (551 nm) was red-shifted and the
band was essentially structureless when compared to that of
the monomer (510, 538 nm) (Supporting Information S2).
The UV-vis absorption and emission spectra of polymer 9
in CHCl3 solution and as thin film are depicted in Figure 1.
The monomer was polymerized by using the ROMP
method in accordance with Scheme 2. The polymerization
was performed with commercially available bis(tricyclo-
hexylphosphine)benzylidine ruthenium(IV) dichloride (first-
generation Grubbs’ catalyst)12 as initiator in dry CH2Cl2 under
an inert atmosphere. The ratio of monomer to initiator was
close to 100:1. The polymerization was allowed to run at
25 °C for 22 h and then terminated by quenching the reaction
mixture with excess ethyl vinyl ether. The homopolymer
were conveniently obtained in pure form by filtration of the
precipitate formed from the reaction mixture followed by
washing with ether for the removal of catalyst and unreacted
monomer. Our attempts to directly polymerize monomer 7
have been unsuccessful so far, which was in agreement with
other endo-monomers of norbornene derivatives.12a,13 On the
contrary, the polymerization of monomer 8 went smoothly
under the same conditions within 22 h, providing oligoth-
iophene-phenylene co-oligomer functionalized polynor-
bornene in 83% yield.
1
The H NMR spectrum of the polymer shows broadened
peaks compared to those of the monomer and the signal of
vinylic protons appeared at 5.59 ppm, which is shifted
upfield. The molecular weight of the polymer was determined
by gel permeation chromatography (GPC), using THF as the
eluent and polystyrene as the standard. The number average
molecular weight (Mn) was determined to be 65 217, and
the polydispersity was narrow (PDI ) 1.08). The thermal
properties were evaluated by means of thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The TGA plot
(Supporting Information S1) of the polymer measured at a
heating rate of 10 °C min-1 revealed that this polymer
exhibited good thermal stability up to 411 °C.
The photophysical properties of both the monomer and
polymer were investigated in solutions and also as a solid
thin film for the polymer, prepared by spin-coating from a
CHCl3 solution. Owing to the comparatively large size and
higher rigidity of the laterally attached co-oligomer relative
to the more fexible polymeric backbone, the thiophene-
phenylene co-oligomer moieties on the side chains are
expected to have slightly weaker interactions with one
another when compared to the individual monomers. This
is supported by the observation that the λmax value observed
Figure 1. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of polymer 9 in CHCl3
solution and as a thin film. (b) Normalized photoluminescence
spectra of polymer 9 in CHCl3 solution and as a thin film.
The λmax of the polymer in solution was around 422 nm,
while the thin film was bathochromically shifted to 435 nm,
and the λmax for the emission of polymer thin film (558 nm)
also undergoes a red-shifting in comparison with that in
solution (551 nm). The red-shifting effect was presumably
due to increased π-π stacking in the solid state. Accordingly,
the optical band gap values of the polymer in solution and
as a film were found to be 2.48 and 2.10 eV. Cyclic
voltammetric measurement of polymer 9 (Supporting Infor-
mation S4) showed two reversible one-electron oxidations
at +0.96 and +1.13 V (versus SCE).
This polymer has been incorporated into a simple organic
photovoltaic cell by spin-coating a CHCl3 solution of the
polymer 9 on an indium-tin oxide (ITO) covered glass
substrate and depositing an aluminum film (50 nm) on top
of the polymer materials. Figure 2 shows the current-voltage
characteristics of the Al/polymer/ITO device in the dark and
under illumination at an intensity of 50 mW/cm2. The device
(10) (a) Iovine, P. M.; Kellett, M. A.; Redmore, N. P.; Therien, M. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8717-8727. (b) Capitosti, G. J.; Guerrero, C.
D.; Binkley, D. E.; Rajesh, C. S., Jr.; Modarelli, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 247-261. (c) Chan, C.; Tse, A. K. S.; Chan, K. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 6084-6089. (d) Vickery, E. H.; Pahler, L. F.; Eisenbraun, E. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1979, 44, 4444-4446. (e) McIntosh, A. R.; Siemiarczuk, A.; Bolton,
J. R.; Stillman, M. J.; Ho, T. F.; Weedon, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
105, 7215-7223. (f) Schmidt, J. A.; Siemiarczuk, A.; Weedon, A. C.;
Bolton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6112-6114.
(11) Long, T. M.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14113-
14119.
(12) (a) Kanaoka, S.; Grubbs, R. H. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 4707-
4713. (b) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 100-110. (c) Weck, M.; Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H. Macromolecules
1996, 29, 1789-1793.
(13) Choi, T. L.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1743-
1746.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 8, 2006
1587