C. Plessis, S. Derrer / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 6519–6522
6521
solvent
H
References
OH
O
1. (a) Halo-acetates: Nagashima, H.; Seki, K.; Ozaki, N.;
Wakamatsu, H.; Itoh, K.; Tomo, Y.; Tsuji, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 55, 985–990; Belletire, J. L.; Mahmoodi, N.
O. J. Nat. Prod. 1992, 55, 194–206; Hanessian, S.; Di
Fabio, R.; Marcoux, J.-F.; Prud’homme, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 55, 3436–3439; Barth, F. O.; Yang, C. Tet-
rahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1121–1124; Lee, E.; Yoon, C.
H.; Lee, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10981–
10933; Lee, E.; Yoon, C. H.; Lee, T. H.; Kim, S. Y.;
Ha, T. J.; Sung, Y.-S.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7469–7478; Terent’ev, A. B.;
Vasil’eva T. T.; Kuz’mima, N. A.; Ikonnikov, N. S.;
Orlova, S. A.; Mysov, E. I.; Belokon’, Y. U. Russ.
Chem. Bull. 1997, 46, 2096–2098.(b) Malonates: Back, T.
G.; Gladstone, P. L. Synlett 1993, 699–700; Back, T. G.;
Gladstone, P. L.; Parvez, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
3806–3814; Baldovini, N.; Bertrand, M.-P.; Carrie`re, A.;
Nouguier, R.; Plancher, J.-M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
3205–3208; Snider, B. B.; McCarthy, B. A. Tetrahedron
1993, 49, 9447–9452; Snider, B. B.; Kiselgof, J. Y. Tet-
rahedron 1998, 54, 10641–10648.(c) Halo-alkyl ‘acrylates’:
Haaima, G.; Routledge, A.; Weavers, R. T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 5159–5162; Haaima, G.; Weavers, R. T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 1085–1088; Lynch, M.-J.;
Simpson, J.; Weavers, R. T. Aust. J. Chem. 1993, 46,
203–212; Haaima, G.; Hanton, L. R.; Lynch, M.-J.;
Mawson, S.; Routledge, A.; Weavers, R. T. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 2161–2174; Clive, D. L. J.; Zhang, J. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997, 549–550; Porter, N. A.;
Chang, V. H.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4976–
4981; Ihara, M.; Setsu, F.; Shohda, M.; Taniguchi, N.;
Fukumoto, K. Heterocycles 1994, 37, 289–292.(d) o-
Bromo-benzoate: Zhang, W.; Pugh, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 7595–7598.(e) Xanthyl-alkyl acrylates:
Vela´squez, S.; Huss, S.; Camarasa, M.-J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1991, 1263–1265.(f) Xanthates: Saicic,
R.; Zard, S. Z. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1996, 14,
1631–1632.(g) Thionolactones: Iwasa, S.; Yamamoto, M.;
Kohmoto, S.; Yamada, K. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
2849–2853.(h) Seleno derivatives: Bachi, M. D.; Bosch E.
J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4696–4705; Bachi, M. D.;
Bosch, E. Heterocycles 1989, 28, 579–582.
'tandem' radical
cyclisation
O
O
O
2'e
formyl radicals
OH
O
O
OH
6
Scheme 3.
amounts to about 9%. Linalool (3e) was obtained in 4%
beside alcohol 6 (7%). The latter resulted from inter-
molecular radical reaction with ethanol (Scheme 3).
None of the formate 4e was observed. A mechanism for
the formation of these bicyclic lactones is proposed in
Scheme 3, involving a ‘tandem’ radical addition first to
the vinylic then to the prenylic carbonꢀcarbon double
bond. Such a behaviour of formyl radicals derived from
xanthates was also observed by Iwasa and co-work-
ers.1g Finally, 10-undecenol-derived xanthenoate 1f
gave only 6% of the expected 13-membered ring lactone
2f, showing the limitations of this method. The forma-
tion of formate 3f (12%) as well as intermolecular side
reactions became predominant. Among the by-products
we identified in particular 7 (12%) and 8 (5%). 10-
Undecenol (3f) was obtained in 13% yield.
O
OH
O
O
7
O
5
OH
8
2. See for example: Anderson, D.; Fra´ter, G. US Patent
6,096,918, 1999.
3. Barton, D. H. R.; Chow, Y. L.; Cox, A.; Kirby, G. W.
J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 3571–3578.
In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that
alkenyl xanthenoates fragment under UV-irradiation
(l>300 nm) to generate xanthene and unsaturated for-
myl radicals that may cyclise to give the corresponding
lactones in acceptable yields. The optimisation of the
system with regard to reaction conditions and additives,
as well as the alteration of the chromophore are subject
of continued efforts.
4. Kobsa, H. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 2293.
5. The xanthenoates, prepared in good yields via the DCC-
mediated coupling of the xanthenoic acid with the alco-
hols, were fully characterised by 1H and 13C NMR, IR
and mass spectroscopy.
6. Approximately three-millimolar solutions of the starting
materials 1a–f in ethanol were irradiated with a 150 W
medium pressure Hg-lamp in a water cooled Pyrex®
photoreactor (>300 nm). Larger scale experiments were
conducted with a 700 W lamp. A typical experiment
consists of irradiating an ethanolic solution of the xan-
thenoate 1a–f (3 g in 3 l) with a 700 W lamp. The
conversion was monitored by GLC-analysis. Reaction
times varied from 48 to 96 h for a conversion of >80%.
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Dr. A. Vasella, ETH Zu¨rich
(Switzerland) for his support. The help rendered by Dr.
J. Schmid, Fragrance Research Analytics, for GLC–MS
support was greatly appreciated.