Y. Chen et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 8285–8288
8287
Me OH MeO CF3
HO Me MeO CF3
O
1. LiAlH4, THF
2. S-Mosher chloride
O
+
10 + 11
Me
12
O
Me
O
13
Scheme 4. MosherÕs esters 12 and 13 were formed to elucidate the enantiomeric excess of 10 and 11.
O
O
O
Me
HO
Me
1. NaOH, EtOH
2. I2, CH3CN
HO
+
O
8 + 9
Me
Me
CH2I
CH2I
14
15
1. LiAlH4
2. Pd-C, H2
HO Me
Me OH
OH
OH
+
Me
16
Me
17
Scheme 5. Determination of relative and absolute stereochemistry of the a-hydroxy acids 8 and 9 formed in the asymmetric crotylation reaction.
molecular sieves (60mg) and then cooled to À78°C. A
CO2i-Pr
solution of ethyl pyruvate (0.11mL,1mmol) in dry tolu-
O
CO2i-Pr
ene (1mL) was then added dropwise over 30min. The
reaction mixture was stirred for 6h at À78°C and then
allowed to warmed to room temperature. The crude
material was purified by silica gel chromatography
(10–20% diethyl ether in hexanes) to give the crotylation
product in analytically pure form.
Me
B
O
RE
O
CO2Et
Rz
Figure 1. Hypothesized transition-state for crotylation of
crotylboronate ester 4.
7 by
revealed that the methyl groups are anti with respect to
the faces of the five-membered lactone ring, as shown in
compound 14 and 15 (Scheme 4). To elucidate the abso-
lute configuration of the enantiomers, esters 8 and 9
were reduced by LiALH4 to afford the corresponding
1,2-diols, which were hydrogenated to yield 16 and 17
as a mixture of diols. Comparison of the optical rotation
of this mixture with the known optical rotation of
compound 16,12 revealed that the major enantiomer
formed during this asymmetric crotylation reaction
with 4 corresponds to the (S,S)-absolute stereochemistry
(Scheme 5).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mr. Neal Reed of the Janda Lab
at The Scripps Research Institute for assistance during
the chiral GC analyses. This work was supported by
The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
In conclusion, we have established that chiral boronates
can react with ethyl pyruvate to yield crotylation prod-
ucts in a diastereospecific manner. By far the best enan-
tioselectivity (up to 73% ee) was achieved with chiral
diisopropyl tartrate-derived boronates. Thus, by starting
with (E) or (Z)-butene and D or L-diisopropyl tartrate,
the four possible crotylation products with two contigu-
ous stereogenic centers can be generated. The major
enantiomer formed in this asymmetric crotylation
is consistent with the transition-state model shown
(Fig. 1).
References and notes
1. Pu, L.; Yu, H.-B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 757–824.
2. Roush, W. R. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost,
B. M., Fleming, I., Heathcock, C. H., Eds.; Pergamon:
Oxford, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 1–53, and references cited therein.
3. (a) Li, H.; Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 6538–
6539; (b) DiMauro, E. F.; Kozloski, M. C. Org. Lett.
2002, 3781–3784.
4. Coppola, G. M.; Schuster, H. F. a-Hydroxyacids in
Enantioselective Synthesis; VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
1997.
1. General procedure
A solution of crotylboronate (1.3mmol) in dry toluene
˚
(3mL) under argon was treated with powdered 4A
5. Yamamoto, Y.; Maruyama, K.; Komastu, T.; Ito, W.
J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 886–891.