C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
can be reduced to the Ni(I) state and binds CO in terminal fashion
(Nip mimic).
Several groups have shown that the ACS activity and the NiFeC
signal of the enzyme diminish upon treatment with 1,10-phenan-
throline (phen), whereupon part of the Ni is removed (labile Ni).1,12
Treatment of 1 or 2 with excess phen (up to 100 equiv) does not
lead to the formation of [Ni(phen)3]2+. However, when 6 is treated
with excess phen (∼25 equiv) in CH2Cl2, the electronic absorption
spectrum of 6 changes to that of the monomer 2 and [Ni(phen)3]2+
over a time period of 35 min, with kobs ) 1.502 × 10-4 s-1 (Figure
S4, Supporting Information). This reaction confirms that the
thiolato-S bridges between the Nid and the Nip centers in models
such as 6 are vulnerable to phen treatment. Since phen does not
remove Ni from the Nid synthons 1 and 2, it is apparent that the
labile Ni in the enzyme arises from the Nip site. Interestingly,
addition of excess (up to 100 equiv) neocuproine, a Cu(I) chelator,
to 6 does not result in any Ni loss. These observations are in line
with those observed with the enzyme.4a,c
In summary, we report two Ni-Ni models, namely 4 and 6, that
exhibit structural features and chemical properties very similar to
those of the binuclear active site of ACS/CODH. These models
are the first examples of sulfur-bridged dinuclear Ni complexes
that bind CO at the bridged Ni(I) center, as proposed in the
mechanism of acetyl coenzyme A synthesis.3 Also, in one case,
the corresponding Ni-Cu model has been characterized.
Figure 3. ORTEP diagram of [Ni(dppe)Ni(PhPepS)] (6) (50% probability)
with the atom-labeling scheme. H atoms are omitted for the sake of clarity.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°): Ni1-Ni2 2.8255(4),
Ni1-N1 1.8909(17), Ni1-N2 1.8895(17), Ni1-S1 2.1558(5), Ni1-S2
2.1438(5), Ni2-S1 2.2354(6), Ni2-S2 2.2413(5), Ni2-P1 2.1781(6),
Ni2-P2 2.1816(6), S2-Ni1-S1 79.29(2), P1-Ni2-P2 86.18(2),
Ni1-S1-Ni2 80.077(19), C1-S1-Ni 111.15(17).
state. The Nid mimic 1 shows no affinity toward CO under similar
reducing conditions, and no EPR signal is observed.
Since the Nip site in ACS is four-coordinate in the resting state,
we attempted synthesis of appropriate Ni-Ni models with a second
Nip synthon, [Ni(dppe)Cl2] (dppe ) 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)-
ethane). This Nip synthon is expected to favor an easier reduction
to the Ni(I) oxidation state and further facilitate binding of CO.
However, due to the geometric constraints imposed by the ligand
frame in 1, all attempts to synthesize the Ni-Ni complex with
[Ni(dppe)Cl2] eventually led to the formation of trimeric (Et4N)2-
[Ni(DMF)2{Ni(NpPepS)}2] (5, Scheme S1, Supporting Informa-
tion). We therefore synthesized the second Nid synthon
[Ni(PhPepS)]2- (anion of 2, structure shown in Figure S2, Sup-
porting Information), employing a ligand with less steric demands.
Reaction of 2 with 1 equiv of [Ni(dppe)Cl2] in MeCN afforded
[Ni(dppe)Ni(PhPepS)] (6, Figure 3) as a blue-green crystalline solid
in 85% yield. In this Ni-Ni model, the two Ni(II) centers are
bridged through both thiolato-S donors of the PhPepS4- ligand
frame, and both exist in square planar geometry. The dihedral angle
between the two square planes is 111.4°, and the Ni- - -Ni separation
is 2.8255(4) Å. The metric parameters of the bridged Nid synthon
in 6 are very similar to that noted with 2. This suggests that sulfur
metalation does not change any structural feature of this Nid mimic.
Complex 6 can be easily reduced with Na2S2O4 or NaBH4, and
6red exhibits a strong Ni(I) EPR spectrum similar to other Ni(I)-
P2S2 complexes.9 Since 2 does not exhibit any reduction wave up
to -1.8 V vs SCE in solvents such as DMF, it is clear that the
reduction occurs at the Nip site of 6. Although 6 displays no reac-
tivity toward CO, the one-electron-reduced species 6red is different.
Passage of CO through a DMF solution of 6red generates the CO
adduct 6red-CO (EPR spectrum shown in Figure S3, Supporting
Acknowledgment. T.C.H. received support from the NIH IMSD
grant GM58903.
Supporting Information Available: Spectroscopic and analytical
data for the complexes; Scheme S1 summarizing the synthetic reactions;
X-band EPR spectra of 4red and 4red-CO (Figure S1) and 6red-CO
(Figure S3); ORTEP diagram of (Et4N)2[Ni(PhPepS)] (2) (Figure S2);
changes in the electronic absorption spectrum of 6 upon phen addition
(Figure S4); and X-ray crystallographic files in CIF format. This
References
(1) Ragsdale, S. W.; Kumar, M. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 2515-2539.
(2) Doukov, T. I.; Iverson, T. M.; Seravalli, J.; Ragsdale, S. W.; Drennan, C.
L. Science 2002, 298, 567-572.
(3) Darnault, C.; Volbeda, A.; Kim, E. J.; Legrand, P.; Vernede, X.; Lindahl,
P. A.; Fontecilla-Camps, J.-C. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 271-279.
(4) (a) Seravalli, J.; Xiao, Y.; Gu, W.; Cramer, S. P.; Antholine, W. E.;
Krymov, V.; Gerfen, G. J.; Ragsdale, S. W. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 3944-
3955. (b) Webster, C. E.; Darensbourg, M. Y.; Lindahl, P. A.; Hall, M.
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3410-3411. (c) Bramlett, M. A.; Tan,
X.; Lindahl, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9316-9317. (d) Schenker,
R. P.; Brunold, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13962-13963.
(5) Svetlitchnyi, V.; Dobbek, H.; Meyer-Klaucke, W.; Meins, T.; Thiele, B.;
Ro¨mer, P.; Huber, R.; Meyer, O. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101,
446-451.
(6) (a) Harrop, T. C.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak, P. K. Chem. Commun.
2004, 1744-1745. (b) Harrop, T. C.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak, P.
K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 338, 189-194.
(7) (a) Krishnan, R.; Riordan, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4484-
4485. (b) Krishnan, R.; Voo, J. K.; Riordan, C. G.; Zahkarov, L.;
Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4422-4423. (c) Linck,
R. C.; Spahn, C. W.; Rauchfuss, T. R.; Wilson, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 8700-8701. (d) Golden, M. L.; Rampersad, M. V.; Reiben-
spies, J. H.; Darensbourg, M. Y. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1824-1825. (e)
Wang, Q.; Blake, A. J.; Davies, E. S.; McInnes, E. J. L.; Wilson, C.;
Schro¨der, M. Chem. Commun. 2003, 3012-3013.
Information) that displays a strong νCO band at 1997 cm-1
consistent with a terminal Ni(I)-CO unit.10 One must note that this
CO value is very close to the enzyme value of 1996 cm-1 11
Rauch-
,
ν
.
fuss and co-workers have reported a dinuclear Ni complex in which
two molecules of CO are bound to a Ni(0) center in terminal fash-
(8) (a) Marganian, C. A.; Vazir, H.; Baidya, N.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak,
P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1584-1594. (b) Baidya, N.; Olmstead,
M. M.; Whitehead, J. P.; Bagyinka, C.; Maroney, M. J.; Mascharak, P.
K. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3612-3619.
(9) (a) Kim, J. S.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Darensbourg, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 4115-4123. (b) James, T. L.; Smith, D. M.; Holm, R. H. Inorg.
Chem. 1994, 33, 4869-4877. (c) Bowmaker, G. A.; Boyd, P. D. W.;
Campbell, G. K.; Hope, J. M.; Martin, R. L. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 2403-
2412.
(10) Stoppioni, P.; Dapporto, P.; Sacconi, L. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 718-725.
(11) Chen, J.; Huang, S.; Seravalli, J.; Gutzman, H., Jr.; Swartz, D. J.; Ragsdale,
S. W.; Bagley, K. A. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 14822-14830.
(12) Shin, W.; Lindahl, P. A. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 12870-12875.
ion.7c This species displays two νCO bands at 1948 and 1866 cm-1
.
Since these νCO values are lower than that of the enzyme, it is quite
possible that the Nip site in ACS does not attain the 0 oxidation
state during catalysis. Recently, two groups have reported sulfur-
bridged dinuclear Ni complexes with P2S2 coordination at the
bridged Ni center that exhibit low reduction potentials.7a,e However,
no spectroscopic data are available on the CO adducts of these
complexes in the reduced state. Complex 6 is therefore the first
structurally characterized Ni-Ni model that includes dicarboxam-
ide-dithiolate ligation (Nid mimic) with a bridged Ni(II) center that
JA045284S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 45, 2004 14715