Fig. 3 Structural diagram of [Cu(3-mtdpm)(hfacac)] with partial atom
numbering schemes (ORTEP, 50% probability ellipsoids). Hydrogen
atoms, solvent molecules, and axial thioether ligation have been omitted for
clarity (top). Stick representation (bottom) shows the head-to-tail dimer
formed by the complex (viewed down the crystallographic b-axis).
prove useful in the preparation of related complexes and
supramolecular structures. The compounds presented here show
that small perturbations in ligand structure can lead not only to the
formation of mononuclear and polymeric structures, as previously
reported,4 but also discrete oligomeric structures. The stabilization
of these heteroleptic complexes by electron-withdrawing spectator
ligands has also been established. We anticipate that these findings
will aid in the discovery of interesting solid-state topologies based
on these dipyrrin motifs.
We thank Prof. A. L. Rheingold and Dr L. Zakharov for
assistance with X-ray structural determinations, Dr Y. Su for mass
spectrometry analysis, and Prof. E. A. Theodorakis for use of his
FT-IR. This work was supported by the University of California,
San Diego, a Chris and Warren Hellman Faculty Scholar award,
the donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research
Fund, and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research
Fellowship (S. R. H.). S. M. C. is a Cottrell Scholar of the
Research Corporation.
Fig. 2 Structural diagram of [Cu(4-mtdpm)(hfacac)] with partial atom
numbering schemes (ORTEP, 50% probability ellipsoids). Hydrogen
atoms, solvent molecules, and axial thioether ligation have been omitted for
clarity (top). Stick representation (bottom) shows the 1-dimensional
coordination polymer formed by the complex.
crystallized and the solid-state structure of [Cu(3-mtdpm)(hfacac)]
shows the desired heteroleptic complex; however, to our surprise,
the compound does not form a coordination polymer.{ Instead,
this compound forms a head-to-tail cyclic dimer, connected
through axial thioether ligands (Fig. 3). The coordination
environment around the metal center is similar to [Cu(4-
˚
mtdpm)(hfacac)] with Cu–N distances of 1.94 A and Cu–O
˚
distances of 1.97 A. The dimer is held together by weak
interactions, with the thioether moiety binding in the axial position
of the coordination sphere, as found in [Cu(4-mtdpm)(hfacac)].
˚
The Cu–S distance in [Cu(3-mtdpm)(hfacac)] is 2.86 A, which is
slightly longer than that found in the coordination polymer [Cu(4-
mtdpm)(hfacac)]. A recently reported complex with 2,8-diethyl-
1,3,7,9-tetramethyl-5-(2-pyridyl) dipyrromethene and zinc(II) ions
forms a related cyclic binuclear structure.14
Notes and references
As mentioned above, the heteroleptic complex [Cu(4-mtdpm)-
(acac)] was found to rearrange to [Cu(4-mtdpm)2] during isolation.
We have found that the stability of these heteroleptic complexes
depends strongly on the nature of the acac ligand, the peripheral
meso donor on the dipyrrin ligand, and the presence of absorbents
such as alumina.4,15 Freshly prepared CH2Cl2–benzene (1 : 1)
solutions of 4-mtdpm were combined with one equivalent of
different copper(II) sources to generate [Cu(4-mtdpm)(acac)],
[Cu(4-mtdpm)(tfacac)] (tfacac ~ trifluoroacetylacetonato), and
[Cu(4-mtdpm)(hfacac)]. The reaction mixtures were stirred at room
temperature and examined by UV–visible spectroscopy to evaluate
the stability of each complex. Immediately after addition of the
copper(II) sources, the expected heteroleptic complexes were
formed as evidenced by a characteristic charge-transfer band
centered at y492 nm.4 After stirring for y1 h, the solution
containing [Cu(4-mtdpm)(acac)] had started to form [Cu(4-
mtdpm)2], which was identified by a new transition at y467 nm.
By y17 h a stable equilibrium mixture of both the homo- and
heteroleptic complexes was achieved. Complexes of [Cu(4-
mtdpm)(tfacac)] and [Cu(4-mtdpm)(hfacac)] showed no change
in electronic spectra over the same time period. These data indicate
that the more electron-withdrawing fluorinated acac ligands
stabilize these heteroleptic complexes, an observation that may
for crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
1 R. Robson, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000, 3735.
2 S. Kitagawa, R. Kitaura and S.-I. Noro, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
43, 2334.
3 B. Moulton and M. J. Zaworotko, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 1629.
4 S. R. Halper, M. R. Malachowski, H. M. Delaney and S. M. Cohen,
Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 1242.
5 S. R. Halper and S. M. Cohen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 2385.
6 S. G. Murray and F. R. Hartley, Chem. Rev., 1981, 81, 365.
7 C. Clausen, D. T. Gryko, A. A. Yasseri, J. R. Diers, D. F. Bocian,
W. G. Kuhr and J. S. Lindsey, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 7371.
8 L. Soto, J. P. Legros and A. Sancho, Polyhedron, 1988, 7, 307.
9 C. L. Schmid, M. Neuburger, M. Zehnder, T. A. Kaden, K. Bujno and
R. Bilewicz, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80, 241.
10 A. Sancho, J. Borras, L. Soto-Tuero, C. Esteban-Calderon, M. Martinez-
Ripoll and S. Garcia-Blanco, Polyhedron, 1985, 4, 539.
11 B. Bilgic¸er, X. Xing and K. Kumar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 11815.
12 M. Euerby and R. D. Waigh, Synth. Commun., 1981, 11, 849.
13 N. Iqbal, C.-A. McEwen and E. E. Knaus, Drug Dev. Res., 2000, 51, 177.
14 J. M. Sutton, E. Rogerson, C. J. Wilson, A. E. Sparke, S. J. Archibald
and R. W. Boyle, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1328.
15 S. R. Halper and S. M. Cohen, 2004, unpublished results.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 6 6 2 – 2 6 6 3
2 6 6 3