C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Analysis of the substituent effect on the TP-synthase-catalyzed
reaction. (a) Comparison of the SN1 solvolysis of p-substituted tert-cumyl
chloride derivatives 8 to the SN2 displacement of benzyl chloride derivatives
9 and to the reaction catalyzed by TP-synthase. (b) Hammett plot (logarithm
(kobs/kMe) versus σp+) of the model SN2 displacement reactions (squares),
the model SN1 solvolysis reactions (triangles), and the enzymatic reactions
(circles). A linear fit to the enzymatic reaction data gives a F value (slope)
of -3.14 ( 0.20.
(6.2 ( 1.0 s-1) was 16 times greater than that observed for HMP-
PP. The steady-state rate also increased, although only by a factor
of about 3, and is likely due to an increase in the rate of dissociation
of methoxythiamin phosphate from the active site. The reaction
using CF3-HMP-PP 6 was extremely slow, and it was necessary to
carry out this reaction under single-turnover conditions ([TP-
synthase] > [Thz-P]) to accurately measure catalysis (Figure 1d).
The reaction proceeded to completion in a monophasic fashion and
was analyzed by fitting the data to a single-exponential equation
([Product] ) A(1-e-λt) + C) to obtain an observed rate of (3.01
( 0.23) × 10-4 s-1. The relative rates of reaction for CH3O-HMP-
Figure 3. Structure of TP-synthase with the bound pyrimidine carbocation
intermediate (PDB ID 1G67). (a) Stereoview of the active site (cross-eye
viewing). (b) Schematic representation of the key active site interactions.
3. One of the pyrophosphate oxygen atoms is located 3.03 Å from
the nitrogen of the pyrimidine amino group. This suggests that
proton transfer or hydrogen bonding of the pyrimidine amino group
to the pyrophosphate oxygen plays an important role in stabilizing
the bound carbocation.
The TP-synthase-catalyzed reaction proceeds via a carbocation
intermediate. The high stability of this intermediate, relative to that
of other enzyme-bound carbocations, makes this enzyme a uniquely
tractable experimental system. This stability has enabled us to
determine the structure of the enzyme intermediate complex and
the rate constant for carbocation formation at the active site.
PP, CH3-HMP-PP, and CF3-HMP-PP were 16, 1, and 7.7 × 10-4
,
respectively.
A Hammett plot for these substituent effects is shown in Figure
2b. Also shown is a plot for the solvolysis of tert-cumyl chloride
derivatives 8, a well studied reaction that proceeds via a carbocation
intermediate, and a plot for the SN2 displacement reaction of benzyl
chloride derivatives 9 (Figure 2a).10-12 These plots demonstrate that
the enzymatic reaction shows similar sensitivity to carbocation
stabilizing/destabilizing substituents as the tert-cumyl chloride
system (Fenz ) -3.14 ( 0.20, Fmodel ) -4.02) and the opposite
sensitivity to the benzyl chloride substitution (F ) +0.73). This
supports the previous exclusion of the SN2 mechanism and suggests
that the observed burst rate is largely a measure of the rate constant
for pyrimidine carbocation formation. This analysis also indicates
that subsequent to carbocation formation Thz-P reacts relatively
rapidly to produce TP. The rate constant for this reaction is most
likely greater than ∼20 s-1 given that no lag in TP formation was
observed, even in the case of the methoxy-substituted HMP-PP
analogue. Furthermore, information gained from this analysis
suggests that protein isomerization does not play a significant role
in limiting the rate of the burst phase.
The crystal structure of the S130A mutant of thiamin phosphate
synthase, with a trapped intermediate in the active site, has been
previously reported.6 The C7 carbon of the pyrimidine is 2.93 Å
from the closest pyrophosphate oxygen and 2.97 Å from the thiazole
nitrogen (Figure 3). As the corresponding C-O (in substrate, HMP-
PP) and C-N (in product, TP) bond lengths are 1.44 and 1.57 Å,
respectively, the structure clearly shows that there is no bonding
between the pyrimidine and the thiazole or the pyrophosphate and
suggests that the observed intermediate is a pyrimidine carbocation
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by NIH grants
DK44083 to T.P.B. and DK67081 to S.E.E.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures for kinetic experiments. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s AdVanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions,
Mechanisms, and Structure, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York,
2001.
(2) Gibbs, R. A. In ComprehensiVe Biological Catalysis; Sinnott, M., Ed.;
Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1998; Vol. 1, pp 31-118.
(3) Poulter, C. D.; Wiggins, P. L.; Le, A. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
3926-3927.
(4) Battersby, A. R.; Leeper, F. J. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 1261-1274.
(5) Davies, G.; Sinnott, M. L.; Witters, S. G. In ComprehensiVe Biological
Catalysis; Sinnott, M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1998; Vol.
1, pp 119-207.
(6) Peapus, D. H.; Chiu, H. J.; Campobasso, N.; Reddick, J. J.; Begley, T.
P.; Ealick, S. E. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 10103-10114.
(7) Reddick, J. J.; Nicewonger, R.; Begley, T. P. Biochemistry 2001, 40,
10095-10102.
(8) Chiu, H. J.; Reddick, J. J.; Begley, T. P.; Ealick, S. E. Biochemistry 1999,
38, 6460-6470.
(9) Reddick, J. J.; Saha, S.; Lee, J. M.; Melnick, J. S.; Perkins, J.; Begley, T.
P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 2245-2248.
(10) Carroll, F. A. PerspectiVes on Structure and Mechanism in Organic
Chemistry; Brooks Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA, 1998.
(11) Brown, H. C.; Okamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 4979-4987.
(12) Jaffe, H. H. Chem. ReV. 1953, 53, 191-261.
JA0679634
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 16, 2007 4861