A R T I C L E S
Bon˜aga et al.
Scheme 1. General Concept of the Macrocyclization Method
Scheme 2. Cobaltacyclobutadiene Complexes from R,ω-Diynes
and BTMSA
been reported, such as for the intramolecular addition of rhodium
carbenes,10 the palladium-catalyzed coupling of enynes with
alkynes,11 and the cycloaddition of Fischer chromium carbenes
with alkynes.12 Macrocyclizations via the Heck reaction are also
noteworthy.13 Although these various methods deliver macro-
cycles in a single step, with a significant increase in molecular
complexity, they all are unimolecular in nature, which inherently
limits the available product diversity. Additionally, this in-
tramolecularity enhances the degree of success. We wondered:
Could a bimolecular macrocyclization process14 that is condu-
cive to a wider range of product diversity also be viable? For
this purpose we envisioned the use of transition-metal-mediated
[2 + 2 + 2] cycloadditions of long-chain R,ω-diynes and
monoalkynes (Scheme 1), such as in the well-known “Vollhardt
reaction”.15,16 However, it is important to keep in mind that such
a bimolecular reaction poses a significant barrier to the efficient
formation of macrocycles in that the high-dilution conditions
(e.g., 0.005 M) required to optimize the macrocyclization relative
to oligomerization can also serve to impede the necessary
bimolecular process.17 To achieve success, these competing
factors would have to be adequately balanced.
We describe herein our studies on the cobalt-catalyzed [2 +
2 + 2] cycloaddition of R,ω-diynes with a third reactive group,
including nitriles, cyanamides, isocyanates, and alkynes. The
scope and limitations of these reactions, in terms of substrates,
conditions, regiochemistry, and mechanism, have been explored.
In several cases this chemistry has provided effective syntheses
of macrocycles containing pyridine, 2-aminopyridine, or 2-oxo-
pyridine units, as meta- and para-pyridinophanes, in isolated
yields greater than 50%. Additionally, we were able to co-
cyclotrimerize alkynes in an intermolecular, macrocyclic variant
of the “Vollhardt reaction”.
(7) (a) In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A.,
Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1999; Vols. 1 and 2. (b) In
Transition Metals in Organic Synthesis; Beller, M., Bolm, C., Eds.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinhem, 1998; Vols. 1 and 2. (c) Aubert, C.; Buisine, O.; Malacria,
M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 813-834. (d) Brummond, K. M.; Kent, J. L.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3263-3283. (e) Fru¨hauf, H.-W. Chem. ReV. 1997,
97, 523-596. (f) Ojima, I.; Tzamarioudaki, M.; Li, Z.; Donovan, R. J.
Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 635-662. (g) For leading references on the synthesis
of medium-sized rings (seven-nine members) by the use of transition
metals, see: Yet, L. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2963-3007. Mori, M.;
Kitamura, T.; Sato, Y. Synthesis 2001, 654-664.
Results and Discussion
Preliminary Studies. We initially investigated the synthesis
of macrocycles by co-cyclotrimerization of R,ω-diynes and an
external alkyne with virtually no success. For instance, in the
reactions of bis-alkynes 1 or 3 with bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene
(BTMSA),15a-c which does not suffer self-trimerization, the
hoped-for benzannulene or cyclophane products were not formed
at all. Instead, we isolated the corresponding bis-η4-cyclobuta-
diene-cobalt complexes 2 or 4 along with unreacted diynes
(Scheme 2; Cp ) cyclopentadienide). Use of a stoichiometric
amount of BTMSA (relative to the diyne) rather than a large
excess resulted only in intractable, presumably polymeric
material. In this regard, cyclobutadiene-cobalt complexes have
already been identified in reactions of BTMSA with 1,n-diynes
(n ) 6, 7)15 and long-chain bis-alkynes.18 It is noteworthy that
significant amounts of macrocyclic [2 + 2 + 2] adducts were
not produced in the study by Brisbois et al.18 Reported examples
of macrocycle formation via metal-mediated alkyne cyclotri-
merization are uncommon, and the successful cases have been
intramolecular reactions in which all three alkyne groups are
tethered to the same molecular backbone.16
(8) (a) Blechert, S.; Connon, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1900-
1923. (b) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18-29.
(c) Tae, J.; Yang, Y.-K. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 741-744.
(9) (a) Grela, K.; Ignatowska, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3747-3749 and references
therein. (b) Fu¨rstner, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5299-5317. (c) Fu¨rstner,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3013-3043.
(10) (a) Doyle, M. P.; Hu, W. Synlett 2001, 1364-1370. (b) Doyle, M. P.; Hu,
W.; Chapman, B.; Marnett, A. B.; Peterson, C. S.; Vitale, J. P.; Stanley, S.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5718-5728.
(11) For a review, see: (a) Saito, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100,
2901-2915. See also: (b) Gevorgyan, V.; Tando, K.; Uchiyama, N.;
Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7022-7025. (c) Saito, S.; Salter,
M. M.; Gevorgyan, V.; Tsuboya, N.; Tando, K.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3970-3971.
(12) (a) Wang, H.; Wulff, W. D.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 8980-8981. (b) Wang, H.; Wulff, W. D.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9862-9863. (c) Wang, H.; Wulff, W. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10573-10574. (d) Do¨tz, K. H.; Gerhardt, A. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1999, 578, 223-228.
(13) (a) Dyker, G.; Kadzimirsz, D.; Henkel, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
7905-7907 and references therein. (b) Geng, X.; Miller, M. L.; Lin, S.;
Ojima, I. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3733-3736.
(14) For some rare examples, see: (a) Schafer, L. L.; Nitschke, J. R.; Mao, S.
S. H.; Liu, F.-Q.; Harder, G.; Haufe, M.; Tilley, T. D. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002,
8, 74-83. (b) Mao, S. S. H.; Liu, F.-Q.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 1193-1206.
(15) (a) Hillard, R. L., III; Vollhardt, K. P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
4058-4069. (b) Vollhardt, K. P. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1977, 10, 1-8. (c)
Funk, R. L.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5253-
5261. (d) For reviews on [2 + 2 + 2] cycloadditions, see: Grotjahn, D. B.
In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G.
A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1995; Vol. 12, pp 741-770.
Schore, N. E. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1081-1119.
(16) Intramolecular alkyne trimerizations, with the three alkyne groups in the
substrate molecule, have afforded macrocyclic products with reasonable
yields. (a) Lofthagen, M.; Chadha, R.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 8785-8790. (b) Kinoshita, H.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7784-7785. (c) For related examples, see: Granier,
T.; Cardenas, D. J.; Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6775-
6779. Hansen, J.; Blake, A. J.; Li, W.-S.; Mascal, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 3371-3376. Damrauer, R.; Hankin, J. A.; Haltiwanger, R.
C. Organometallics 1991, 10, 3962-3964. Mascal, M.; Hansen, J.; Blake,
A. J.; Li, W.-S. Chem. Commun. 1998, 355-356. Hubert, A. J.; Hubert,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 5779-5782. Hubert, A. J. J. Chem. Soc. (C)
1967, 6-14, 1984-1985.
One can appreciate these negative results in the synthesis of
macrocycles by examining the mechanism of the cobalt-
mediated alkyne cyclotrimerization (Scheme 3, X ) CR′).19 The
formation of arene adducts could be achieved via two main
pathways, a and b, depending on which alkyne moieties undergo
(17) (a) Under high-dilution conditions the unfavorable statistics of intramo-
lecular cyclization relative to an intermolecular oligomerization can be
overcome.5 (b) A discussion of these two competing reaction pathways,
with their disparate requirements, appeared as early as 1935 (Spangel, E.
W.; Carothers, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1935, 57, 929-934).
(18) Brisbois, R. G.; Fogel, L. E.; Nicaise, O. J.-C.; DeWeerd, P. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 6708-6709.
9
3474 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 10, 2005