1632
Y. Zhang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1629–1632
In summary, oleanolic acid derivatives 1f and 1g showed
a high inhibitory activity on formation of OCLs. Com-
pound 1f was the most potent with 16.3% inhibition of
OCL formation relative to the control (100%). Proline
and phenylalanine substituents of oleanolic acid showed
a tendency to enhance the activity, other amino acids
that used in the experiments had no benefit on improve-
ment of the activity. Removal of the hydrogen atoms on
C11 gave a big impact on the electronic structure and
could be a major cause of decrease of anti-OCLs forma-
tion activity. The locations and the relative energies of
HOMO and LUMO might closely relate to the activity.
Further syntheses of derivatives, studies on bioactivities
and analyses of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO
and LUMO are in progress and will be reported in
due course.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
References and notes
1. Crandall, C. Postgrad. Med. 2003, 114, 21.
2. Farina, C.; Gagliardi, S. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002, 8,
2033.
3. Li, J. X.; Kadota, S.; Li, H. Y.; Miyahara, T.; Namba, T.
J. Trad. Med. 1996, 13, 50.
4. Li, J. X.; Li, H. Y.; Miyahara, T.; Tezuka, Y.; Kadota, S.;
Tonami, S.; Seto, H.; Namba, T. J. Trad. Med. 1997, 14,
366.
Figure 2. Comparison of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO and
LUMO of compounds 1f and 2f.
´ ˇ
5. Giner-Larza, E. M.; Manez, S.; Recio, M. C.; Giner, R.
Table 2. Energies (eV) of the frontier molecular orbitals for the OA
derivatives
´
M.; Prieto, J. M.; Cerda-Nicolas, M.; Rıos, J. L. Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 2001, 428, 137.
´
´
Compd EHOMO
ELUMO Compd EHOMO
ELUMO
6. Hsu, H. Y.; Yang, J. J.; Lin, C. C. Can. Lett. 1997, 111, 7.
7. Zhu, Y. M.; Shen, J. K.; Wang, H. K.; Cosentino, L. M.;
Lee, K. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 3115.
8. Joeng, H. G. Toxicol. Lett. 1999, 105, 215.
9. Assefa, H.; Nimrod, A.; Walker, L.; Sindelar, R. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1889.
1
À9.4197 1.0450
2
À10.1327 À0.0741
À10.1610 À0.1515
À10.1628 À0.1517
À10.0674 À0.1585
À10.0711 À0.1623
À10.1427 À0.1551
À9.6960 À0.1108
À9.6819 À0.0594
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
À9.5186 0.5616
À9.4879 0.6895
À9.4979 0.7840
À9.5010 0.8179
À9.4940 0.7725
À9.4375 0.1894
À9.3953 0.8632
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
10. Zaprutko, L.; Partyka, D.; Bednarczyk-Cwynar, B. Bio-
org. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 4723.
11. Honda, T.; Rounds, B. V.; Bore, L.; Finlay, H. J.;
Favaloro, F. G., Jr.; Suh, N.; Wang, Y.; Sporn, M. B.;
Gribble, G. W. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4233.
12. Favaloro, J. F. G.; Honda, T.; Honda, Y.; Gribble, G. W.;
Suh, N.; Risingsong, R.; Sporn, M. B. J. Med. Chem.
2002, 45, 4801.
The calculations were carried out at semi-empirical PM3 level.
be investigated further. These results suggested that con-
version of the C11-methylene to a carbonyl group
strongly impacted the energies and locations of HOMO
and LUMO, and the compound with high EHOMO might
have the potent activity. It is worth to indicate that a lot
of efforts remained in order to reach a simple rule to pre-
dict the activity. Hopefully, further detailed analyses
could clarify the relationship between the electronic
structure and activity, create electronic indices including
the optimal locations and the energies of HOMO and
LUMO, environmental aspects, such as hydrophobicity,
and give a guide to synthesis of the more potent
inhibitors.
13. Jeong, H. J.; Chai, H. B.; Park, S. Y.; Kim, D. S. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1201.
14. Barnes, R. A.; Pereira, A. L.; Scofield, T. C. V.; Filho, R.
B.; Pinto, A. C. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1984, 32, 3674.
15. Linde, H. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim, Germany) 1979, 312,
832.
16. Brenner, M.; Huber, W. Helv. Chim. Acta 1953, 36, 1109.
17. Takahashi, N.; Akatsu, T.; Udagawa, N.; Sasaki, T.;
Yamaguchi, A.; Moseley, J. M.; Martin, T. J.; Suda, T.
Endocrinology 1988, 123, 2600.
18. Okubo, Y.; Bessho, K.; Fujimura, K.; Kusumoto, K.;
Ogawa, Y.; Iizuka, T. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
2000, 269, 317.
19. Niu, J.; Yu, G. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2004, 18, 39.