example, the inset in Figure 1). From the double expo-
nential fit, the decay of the two components was mea-
sured as 2.9 × 106 and 3 × 105 s-1, respectively. The
former value is very similar to the rate constant mea-
sured for the rearrangement of 1•, generated by method
1 in MeCN (between 2.5 and 3.2 × 106 s-1).1,3,22,23 On the
basis of this observation, the fast component of the double
exponential decay observed in the 440-570 nm range can
be reasonably assigned to the same process, i.e., the
O-neophyl rearrangement of 1•. The slow component is
instead assigned to the decay of 4-NBS•.21
An analogous behavior was observed after 355 nm LFP
of 1e in benzene and CCl4, and also in these solvents the
rearrangement rate constants of 1• were determined from
the first-order fit to the fast component of the double
exponential decay observed in the 440-570 nm range.
The rearrangement rate constants thus obtained for 1•,
generated by method 2 in MeCN, benzene, and CCl4, are
also reported in Table 1.
The kinetic data collected in Table 1 clearly show that
for both 1• and 2• the rearrangement rate constant
decreases by increasing solvent polarity. As an example,
with 1• the rate constant decreases from 4.8 × 106 to 1.5
× 106 s-1 on going from CCl4 to TFE. This behavior is in
full agreement with the mechanistic picture presented
above indicating that the O-neophyl rearrangement of
1,1-diarylalkoxyl radicals involves a decrease in the
extent of internal charge separation on going from the
starting 1,1-diarylalkoxyl radical to the transition state.
However, because a decrease in the extent of charge
separation can be expected for both the concerted and
the stepwise mechanisms described in Scheme 1 (path a
and paths b-c, respectively),1 the kinetic solvent effect
data displayed in Table 1 do not provide any new
information that may contribute to distinguish between
these two mechanistic possibilities.24
FIGURE 2. Plot of log(k/s-1) for the rearrangement of radical
1• against the normalized Dimroth-Reichardt solvent polarity
N
parameter ET in different solvents. From the linear regres-
sion: slope ) -0.58, r2 ) 0.9944.
been interpreted in terms of the stabilization of the
transition state for cumyloxyl radical C-Me â-scission
through increased solvation of the incipient carbonyl
product. As it has been pointed out that the ETN param-
eter is mainly related to the solvent anion solvating
ability,26 the observation of a log kâ vs ET correlation
N
has been explained in terms of the development of
negative charge on the oxygen atom of the forming
carbonyl compound. Along this line, the negative slope
of the log k vs ETN correlation (Figure 2) observed in the
O-neophyl rearrangement of the 1,1-diphenylethoxyl
radical 1• reasonably reflects the decrease in the extent
of negative charge on the oxygen atom on going from the
starting radical to the transition state.
Quite interestingly, an excellent correlation is obtained
between the logarithm of the experimental rate constants
measured for the rearrangement of the 1,1-dipenylethox-
yl radical 1• (log(k/s-1)) and the normalized Dimroth-
In conclusion, laser flash photolysis experiments car-
ried out in different solvents have shown that the rate
constant for O-neophyl rearrangement of 1,1-diaryla-
lkoxyl radicals decreases by increasing solvent polarity.
This observation provides support for the previous hy-
pothesis that the O-neophyl rearrangement of 1,1-dia-
rylalkoxyl radicals involves a decrease in the extent of
internal charge separation on going from the starting
radical to the transition state. On the other hand, the
kinetic solvent effect data do not provide any new
information that may contribute to distinguishing be-
tween the two possible mechanisms described for the
O-neophyl rearrangement of 1,1-diarylalkoxyl radicals:
the concerted mechanism and the stepwise one that
proceeds through the formation of a bridged 1-oxaspiro-
[2,5]octadienyl radical intermediate.
Reichardt solvent polarity parameter ET (Figure 2).25
N
An analogous correlation (log kâ vs ETN) has been
reported for the â-scission reaction of the cumyloxyl
radical,11,13 where however, in contrast with the present
study, the fragmentation rate constant was observed to
increase by increasing solvent polarity. This behavior has
(23) Falvey, D. E.; Khambatta, B. S.; Schuster, G. B. J. Phys. Chem.
1990, 94, 1056-1059.
(24) As described previously (see ref 1), in a concerted mechanism
a reactant-like transition state that is close in structure to the 1,1-
diarylalkoxyl radical can be expected. On the other hand, in a stepwise
mechanism the transition state of the rate-determining step will be
close in structure to the 1-oxaspiro[2,5]octadienyl radical intermediate.
As compared to the latter mechanism, with the former one a signifi-
cantly smaller decrease in the extent of internal charge separation on
going from the starting 1,1-diarylalkoxyl radical to the transition state
should be expected. Accordingly, the observation of relatively small
kinetic solvent effects in the rearrangement of 1•, with k decreasing
from 4.8 × 106 to 1.5 × 106 s-1 on going from CCl4 to TFE, may be
more in line with the operation of a concerted mechanism. As a matter
of comparison, significantly larger kinetic solvent effects have been
observed for the â-scission reaction of the cumyloxyl radical, with k
increasing from 2.6 × 105 to 6.1 × 106 s-1 on going from CCl4 to TFE
(see refs 11 and 13), indicative of a relatively larger increase in the
extent of charge separation on going from the cumyloxyl radical to the
carbonyl-like transition state.
Experimental Section
Materials. Spectroscopic grade MeCN, CH2Cl2, CCl4, TFE,
and benzene were used as received. The synthesis of peroxides
1p and 2p has been described previously.1 4-Nitrobenzene-
sulfenate ester 1e was prepared by reaction of 1,1-diphenyle-
thanol (1 equiv) and freshly distilled triethylamine (2.5 equiv)
with 4-nitrobenzenesulfenyl chloride (1.1 equiv) in anhydrous
CH2Cl2 at - 78 °C, according to a previously described proce-
dure.20 The crude product was purified by column chromatog-
(25) Reichardt, C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry,
3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003.
(26) See ref 25, pp 462-463.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 25, 2005 10605