Polymorph of Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanoparticles
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.33-7.31 (m, 4H), 6.97-6.88 (m, 6H),
2.50 (s, 4H), 2.35 (s, 12H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 133.3 (m-C),
129.1 (o-C), 128.8 (p-C), 124.5 (ipso-C), 57.7 (-N-CH2), 47.7
(N-CH3). Anal. Calcd for C18H26CdN2S2: C, 48.37; H, 5.86; N,
6.27. Found: C, 48.51; H, 6.02; N, 6.13.
of one of the two common polytypes (zinc blende or wurtzite)
but also nanoparticles with domains of zinc blende and
wurtzite within the same particle were observed.27-29 It was
shown that such intergrowth, caused by either stacking faults
or twin borders in the nanoscale crystallite, leads to diffrac-
tion patterns with the same kind of overlapping reflections
as those of a mixture of separate crystallites of the same
size.27 Thus, the “mixture” of zinc blende and wurtzite
obtained for the CdSe particles can stem from (i) a real
mixture of separate particles of the cubic and hexagonal
polymorphs, (ii) from particles consisting of domains of a
polytype with a stacking sequence different from strict
ABCABC and strict ABABAB (e.g., ABABCBCABCB with
a longer translational period),27,30 or (iii) random stacking
faults in a zinc blende type, leading to layers of wurtzite
type plane stacking (e.g., ABCABCABAB). All three pos-
sibilities have already been observed in cadmium chalco-
genide nanocrystals. Especially in the case of CdSe, there is
apparently no preference for a certain polytype in small
nanoparticles,27 and the stacking along [111] of the cubic
phase seems to be almost random. In light of these observa-
tions, it becomes much more obvious why there is no driving
force for a room-temperature phase transition of the particles
into pure wurtzite either in the silanol covered pores or in
aqueous solution.
Preparation of Cd(SePh)2‚TMEDA. An amount of 0.340 g
(0.75 mmol) of Me3SiSePh in 20 mL of toluene was added to a
mixture of 4 mL of TMEDA and 0.137 g (0.75 mmol) of CdCl2 in
30 mL of toluene. The reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 8 h and subsequently filtered to remove a small
amount of a white solid.. The amount of solvent was reduced to
half of its volume under reduced pressure, and the solution was
stored at -24 °C. Colorless crystals of Cd(SePh)2‚TMEDA were
obtained (mp 127 °C, 0.285 g, 70% yield).
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.49-7.47 (m, 4H), 6.95-6.86 (m, 6H),
2.53 (s, 4H), 2.34 (s, 12H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 136.1 (m-C),
128.8 (o-C, p-C), 124.3 (ipso-C), 57.0 (-N-CH2), 47.3 (N-CH3).
Anal. Calcd for C18H26CdN2Se2: C, 39.98; H, 4.85; N, 5.18.
Found: C, 39.14; H, 4.92; N, 5.41.
Preparation of Cd(TePh)2. A sample of 0.818 g (2.0 mmol) of
diphenyl ditelluride was dissolved in 30 mL of THF, and the
solution was cooled to -78 °C. An amount of 4.2 mL of a 1 M
solution of Li[Et3BH] was added, and the reaction mixture was
stirred for 2 h. An amount of 0.51 mL (4.0 mmol) of Me3SiCl was
added to the solution, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h
and allowed to warm to room temperature. The resulting lithium
chloride was removed by filtration. A colorless solution was
obtained. A solution of 0.366 mg (2.0 mmol) of CdCl2 in THF
was added at -78 °C. The reaction was allowed to warm to room
temperature within 12 h, and the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. An orange solid of Cd(TePh)2 was obtained (0.345
g, 32% yield).
Experimental Section
All synthetic manipulations were carried out under exclusion of
air and moisture in an argon atmosphere. All solvents were dried
and freshly distilled under argon prior to use. CdCl2, Me3SiCl, Ph2-
Te2, Ph2Se2, Ph2S2, and Li[Et3BH], 1 M in THF, were purchased
from Aldrich and used as obtained. Powder diffraction patterns were
recorded on a Philips X′Pert diffractometer using Cu KR radiation.
Recording times of 48 h were applied for the nanocomposites. Me3-
SiTePh, Me3SiSePh, and Me3SiSPh and SBA-15 silica with a pore
diameter of d ) 7 nm were synthesized according to literature
procedures.14,20-22
TEM was performed using a JEOL JEM 3010 electron micro-
scope (300 kV; LaB6 cathode). The samples were finely dispersed
in ethanol. One drop of the dispersion was placed on a carbon-
coated copper grid and allowed to dry, leaving the crystallites in a
random orientation on the support film.
Thermal analyses were carried out under a dynamic argon
atmosphere with a Netzsch Pegasus 404 DSC calorimeter.
Preparation of Cd(SPh)2‚TMEDA. In a Schlenk flask, 0.137
g (0.75 mmol) of CdCl2 and 6 mL of TMEDA were dissolved in
30 mL of toluene. An amount of 0.273 g (1.5 mmol) of Me3SiSPh
in 20 mL of toluene was added at room temperature, and the
resulting reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h. The mixture was
filtered to remove a small quantity of a white solid, and the filtrate
was evaporated to about half of its volume under reduced pressure.
The resulting light yellow solution was stored at -24 °C to give
colorless crystals of Cd(SPh)2‚TMEDA (mp 106 °C, 0.423 g, 0.95
mmol, 63% yield).
Preparation of Cd(TePh)2‚TMEDA. A suspension of 1.80 g
(3.45 mmol) of Cd(TePh)2 in 30 mL of toluene was stirred at room
temperature, 2 mL of TMEDA was added, and the mixture was
stirred for an additional 24 h. An amount of 15 mL of pyridine/
octane (1:2, v/v) was added to the light yellow solution, and the
solution was filtered. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness, and
the residue was dissolved in 20 mL of toluene. The solution was
filtered again, the toluene was removed under vacuum, and a light
yellowish solid was obtained (mp 101 °C, 60% yield).
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.74-7.72 (m, 4H), 7.15-7.07 (m, 6H),
2.41 (s, 4H), 2.29 (s, 12H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 137.7 (m-C),
129.4 (o-C), 128.0 (p-C), not detected (ipso-C), 57.1 (-N-CH2),
47.4 (N-CH3). Anal. Calcd for C18H26CdN2Te2: C, 33.88; H, 4.11;
N, 4.38. Found: C, 33.47; H, 4.37; N, 4.59.
Synthesis of the Nanocomposites. A mixture of 20 mg of Cd-
(EPh)2‚TMEDA (E ) S, Se, Te) and 50 mg of calcined SBA-15
silica was heated to 140 °C for 4 h. The temperature was raised to
350 °C at a rate of 1 K/min, and the sample was kept at this
temperature for 16 h. The product was cooled to room temperature
under a constant flow of argon. It was washed twice with 20 mL
of hexane to remove potentially remaining organic residues and
dried under vacuum. A yellowish product was obtained for
CdS@SBA-15, whereas gray powders were obtained for CdSe@
SBA-15 and CdTe@SBA-15.
(27) Bawendi, M. G.; Kortan, A. R.; Steigerwald, M. L.; Brus, L. E. J.
Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 7282.
(28) Ricolleau, C.; Audinet, L.; Gandais, M.; Gacoin, T. Eur. Phys. J. D
1999, 9, 565.
(29) Ricolleau, C.; Audinet, L.; Gandais, M.; Gacoin, T.; Boilot, J.-P.;
Chamarro, M. J. Cryst. Growth 1996, 159, 861.
(30) Lincot, D.; Mokili, B.; Froment, M.; Corte`s, R.; Bernard, J.-P.; Witz,
C.; Lafait, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2174.
Calorimetric Measurements. An amount of 30 mg of Cd(EPh)2‚
TMEDA (E ) S, Se, Te) was placed in a DSC pan consisting of
a Pt/Rh mantle and a Al2O3 inlay and covered with a Pt/Rh lid.
The calorimeter was evacuated twice and filled with argon before
the measurements. The measurements were carried out under a
constant gentle flow of argon at a heating rate of 10 K/min.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 16, 2005 5895