J. Fang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5075–5077
5077
Table 1
ER and ERb binding data
accommodating unbranched alkyl chains in this region of the bind-
ing pocket resulting in a loss of binding affinity.
In summary, we have modified a previously described cycloaro-
matization procedure to prepare a series of 3-alkyl substituted
a
Compound
R1
R2
R3
ER
(nM)
a
binding Ki
ERb binding Ki
(nM)
naphthalenes with good affinity for ER
a and ERb. This route pro-
Estradiol
Raloxifene
10a
10b
10c
10d
10e
11a
11b
—
—
H
H
H
H
H
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
—
—
H
H
—
—
2
2
2
23
vides a more efficient approach to the naphthalene scaffold than
those previously reported for structurally related ER ligands, and
provides a method to directly examine the impact of substitution
at the C3-position on binding to estrogen receptors.
CH3OCH2
Bu
Bu
Bu
Bu
cyclo-Pr
Bu
i-Bu
Pentyl
Octyl
692
977
724
158
52
60
4
28
2
55
501
170
110
162
48
16
4
22
3
F
OCH3
OH
H
H
H
References and notes
11c
11d
11e
1. Karnik, P. S.; Kulkarni, S.; Liu, X. P.; Budd, G. T.; Bukowski, R. M. Cancer Res.
1994, 54, 349.
2. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. J. Am. Med.
Assoc. 2002, 288, 321.
H
H
30
3. Jordan, V. C. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 1988, 11, 197.
4. Delmas, P. D. et al J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 3609.
5. Vogel, V. G.; Costantino, J. P.; Wickerham, D. L., et al J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2006, 295,
2727.
6. Hauser, K. L.; Palkowitz, A. D., et al. European Patent 0835867A1, 1998.
7. Heyer, D.; Fang, J.; Navas, F., III; Katamreddy, S. R.; Peckham, J. P.; Turnbull, P.
S.; Miller, A. B.; Akwabi-Ameyaw, A. PCT Int. Application WO2006002185A1,
2006.
8. Ciufolini, M. A.; Weiss, T. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1127.
9. Makra, F.; Rohloff, J. C.; Muehldorf, A. V.; Link, J. O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
6815.
10. Shi, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, K. K. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 925.
11. Raap, J.; Nieuwenhuis, S.; Creemers, A.; Hexspoor, S.; Kragl, U.; Lugtenburg, J.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2609.
12. Hu, Y.; Baudart, S.; Porco, J. A., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1049.
13. General procedure for cycloaromatization: A solution of acetophenone 1 (0.88 g,
3.18 mmol) in toluene (8 mL) was added to a solution of KHMDS in toluene
(0.5 M, 1.2 equiv) at À78 °C under N2. After completion of addition, the cold
bath was removed, and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to room
temperature, then heated at 80 °C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was then
cooled in an ice bath, quenched with 2 N HCl, diluted with 50 mL of water, and
extracted with EtOAc. The organic extracts were combined and washed with
brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was
chromatographed on silica gel (5% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford naphthol 4 as a
light yellow solid (0.60 g, 68%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 0.76 (t, J = 7.3 Hz,
3H), 1.15–1.30 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.55 (m, 2H), 2.49 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 5.20 (s, 1H),
7.33 (s, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.50–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.75
(d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H).
14. Zhang, Q.; Shi, C.; Zhang, H. R.; Wang, K. K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7977.
15. Dimmock, J. R.; Puthucode, R. N.; Smith, J. M.; Hetherington, M.; Quail, J. W.;
Pugazhenthi, U.; Lechler, T.; Stables, J. P. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3984.
16. Martyn, D. C.; Hoult, D. A.; Abell, A. D. Aust. J. Chem. 2001, 54, 391.
17. Wu, G.; Schumacher, D. P.; Tormos, W.; Clark, J. E.; Murphy, B. L. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 2996.
multiple by-products. Refluxing 1 with 1 equiv of camphorsulfonic
acid in CHCl3 only resulted in a trace amount of 4.
Using this cycloaromatization reaction, we synthesized various
3-alkyl-2-aryl-1-naphthols 8 starting from an appropriate aryl
bromide or aryl triflate 5 for the Sonogashira coupling14 (Scheme 3).
1-Naphthol 8 was then heated with 4-F benzaldehyde in the pres-
ence of a base (NaH or Cs2CO3)15 to give aryloxy benzaldehyde 9.
Formyl group of 9 was converted to acrylic acid side chain of
10a–e using Horner-Emmons olefination16 followed by saponifica-
tion or Knoevenagel condensation17with malonic acid in pyridine.
When R1 = OMe, demethylation with BBr3 in CH2Cl2 yielded C6-OH
naphthalene analogues 11a–e.
Compounds 10a–e and 11a–e were tested for their ability to
compete with 3H-estradiol for binding to full length biotinylated
human ER
with the observed binding mode of GW2368 to ER
a
and ERb linked to an SPA bead (Table 1).7 Consistent
a
, the C6-H
(des hydroxyl) analogues 10a–e are significantly less potent than
the corresponding C6-OH analogues 11a–e due to the inability of
10a–e to form hydrogen bonds with Glu 353 and Arg 394 in ER
a
and Glu 305 and Arg 346 in ERb.18 Enhanced potency in the
R1 = H series was observed with the R2 phenol analogue 10e, which
is well positioned to form a hydrogen bond with His-524 (ERa) or
His-475 (ERb).18 In general, small unbranched alkyl groups are well
tolerated at C3 position of the naphthalenes as predicted in Figure
2. The octyl analogue (11e) appears to approach the steric limit for
18. Jordan, V. C. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 883.