stretching frequencies of a m1,3-bridging formate ion. This was also
confirmed by an X-ray crystal structure determination of 5?BPh4
(see ESI{).
In conclusion, we have prepared the first stable dinuclear
nickel(II) borohydrido-bridged complex of a macrodinucleating
hexaaza-dithiophenolate ligand. Work in progress is directed
towards the synthesis of related compounds with bridging hydride
ligands by taking advantage of the steric protection offered by the
supporting ligand. Such compounds may also aid in understanding
the electronic structures and the reactivities of the dinuclear active
sites of the hydrogenase enzymes.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs-
gemeinschaft (Project KE 585/4-1,2).
Fig. 2 Plot of xmT against T for 3?BPh4. The solid line represents the
best theoretical fit of the magnetic susceptibility data by full-matrix
diagonalization of the spin Hamiltonian H = 22J S1?S2 + D(Sz12 + Sz22 2
4/3) + gb(S1 + S2)B. Experimental and calculated data are provided as
ESI.{
Notes and references
§ Crystal data for [(L)NiII2(m1,3-BH4)](BPh4)?2MeCN (3?BPh4?2MeCN):
¯
C66H94B2N8Ni2S2, M = 1202.65. Triclinic, space group P1, (no. 2), a =
˚
15.992(3), b = 16.080(3), c = 16.515(3) A, a = 63.82(3), b = 70.97(3),
c = 66.47(3)u, V = 3436(1) A , Z = 2, Dcalcd. = 1.162 g cm23, m(Mo-Ka) =
3
˚
0.651 mm21, T = 210 K. Using Mo-Ka radiation (0.71073 A), a total of
˚
31051 reflections were collected of which 16023 were independent.
Refinement converged to R1 = 0.0749, wR2 = 0.2053 [I > 2s(I)].
Hydrogen atoms for the g2-BH4 ligand were located from the final
difference map and were refined isotropically with Ueq(H) 1.2 times that of
the boron to which they are attached. The MeCN solvate molecules were
found to be disordered over two positions. CCDC 280004. Crystal data for
[(L)NiII2(m1,3-O2CH)](BPh4) (5?BPh4): C63H85BN6Ni2O2S2, M =
1150.72. Monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 18.452(4), b = 34.531(7), c =
centres in a symmetrical fashion to generate a bioctahedral
N3NiII(m-S)2(m-BH4)NiIIN3 core structure that has never been
observed before in nickel–thiolate chemistry. There are no
interactions between the MeCN of solvent of crystallization and
the [(L)NiII (m-BH4)]+ cations. The average Ni–H distance at
2
˚
1.89(4) A compares well with that in the mononuclear NiS4H2
3
23
complex [NiII(bmp)2] (bmp = bis(2-mercapto-1-methylimidazolyl)-
borate),14 the only other sulfur-rich Ni(II) complex with B–H Ni
…
18.452(4) A, b = 92.22(3)u, V = 11748(4) A , Z = 8, Dc = 1.301 g cm
,
˚
˚
m(Mo-Ka) = 0.761 mm21, T = 210 K. Using Mo-Ka radiation (0.71073 A),
a total of 74914 reflections were collected of which 28479 were independent.
Refinement converged to R1 = 0.0778, wR2 = 0.1651 [I > 2s(I)]. CCDC
280005. For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see
DOI: 10.1039/b512744k
˚
interactions that has been structurally characterised.
Magnetic susceptibility measurements have been carried out to
see whether magnetic exchange interactions are present in 3?BPh4.
As can be seen from Fig. 2, the product xmT (per dinuclear
complex) gradually increases from 2.69 cm3 K mol21 at 295 K to a
maximum of 3.29 cm3 K mol21 at 28 K, and then decreases
rapidly to 2.74 mB at 2 K. This behaviour indicates an
intramolecular ferromagnetic exchange interaction between the
two Ni2+ ions in 3.15
1 D. J. Evans and C. J. Pickett, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2003, 32, 268.
2 (a) A. C. Marr, D. J. E. Spencer and M. Schro¨der, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2001, 219–221, 1055; (b) S. Brooker, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 222,
33–56.
3 C. A. Grapperhaus and M. Y. Darensbourg, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31,
451.
4 C.-H. Lai, J. H. Reibenspies and M. Y. Darensbourg, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 2390.
5 S. C. Davies, D. J. Evans, D. L. Hughes, S. Longhurst and J. R. Sanders,
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1935.
6 D. Sellmann, F. Geipel, F. Lauderbach and F. W. Heinemann, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 632.
7 F. Gloaguen, J. D. Lawrence and T. B. Rauchfuss, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 726.
8 A. J. Amoroso, S. S. M. Chung, D. J. E. Spencer, J. P. Danks,
M. W. Glenny, A. J. Blake, P. A. Cooke, C. Wilson and M. Schro¨der,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 2020.
9 P. J. Desrochers, S. LeLievre, R. J. Johnson, B. T. Lamb, A. L. Phelps,
A. W. Cordes, W. Gu and S. P. Cramer, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 7945.
10 G. Steinfeld and B. Kersting, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1376.
11 N. F. Curtis, J. Chem. Soc., 1965, 924.
Least-squares fit of the magnetic susceptibility data by full-
matrix diagonalization of the appropriate spin Hamiltonian H =
22J S1?S2 + D(Sz12 + Sz22 2 4/3) + gb(S1 + S2)B gave J = 27 cm21
,
D = +4.3 cm21, and g = 2.09 (or alternatively J = 27.5 cm21
,
D = 23.9 cm21, and g = 2.09). Interestingly, the J value of 27 cm21
is by far the largest value that has ever been observed in dinuclear
nickel(II) complexes supported by (L)22 16
It indicates that the
.
ferromagnetic magnetic exchange interactions are not only
propagated via the bridging thiolate functions but also through
the m1,3-bridging borohydride ion. To the best of our knowledge,
this property of the BH42 ion has not been documented previously
in the literature. This suggests its use as a building block in the
construction of molecular based magnetic materials.
12 T. J. Marks and J. R. Kolb, Chem. Rev., 1977, 77, 263.
13 B. Kersting, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 3988.
14 H. M. Alvarez, M. Krawiec, B. T. Donovan-Merkert, M. Fouzi and
D. Rabinovich, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 5736.
15 In the solid state the dinuclear nickel complexes are well separated by the
bulky tetraphenylborate anions. The abrupt decrease in xmT below 28 K
is therefore most likely due to zero field splitting of NiII and not to
intermolecular exchange interactions.
Preliminary results show that 3 reacts with protic reagents HA,
such as HCl, H2O, or HCO2H with liberation of H2 and formation
of the respective [(L)NiII (A)]+ species (A = Cl2 1, OH2 4 and
2
HCO22 5). Complexes 1 and 4 have been reported earlier. The new
complex 5 is also readily produced by the reaction of 3 with CO2.
IR measurements of 5?BPh4 showed two absorption bands at 1602
and 1424 cm21, attributable to the symmetric and antisymmetric
16 J. Hausmann, M. H. Klingele, V. Lozan, G. Steinfeld, D. Siebert,
Y. Journaux, J. J. Girerd and B. Kersting, Chem. Eur. J., 2004, 10, 1716.
84 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 83–84
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006