X. Wen et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 722–726
Table 1. Rabbit muscle GPa inhibition assay results for maslinic acid
derivatives
725
References and notes
a
1. Kurukulasuriya, R.; Link, J. T.; Madar, D. J.; Pei, Z.;
Richards, S. J.; Rohde, J. J.; Souers, A. J.; Szczepankie-
wicz, B. G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 123.
Compound
RMGPa IC50 (lM)
1
5
28
29
ndb
2. (a) Oikonomakos, N. G. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2002, 3,
´
6
561; (b) Somsak, L.; Nagy, V.; Hadady, Z.; Docsa, T.;
7
66
Gergely, P. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 1177.
3. Tracey, W. R.; Treadway, J. L.; Magee, W. P.; Sutt, J. C.;
McPherson, R. K.; Levy, C. B.; Wilder, D. E.; Yu, L. J.;
Chen, Y.; Shanker, R. M.; Mutchler, A. K.; Smith, David
M.; Flynn, A. H.; Knight, D. R. Am. J. Physiol. Heart
Circ. Physiol. 2004, 286, H1177.
4. (a) Schnier, J. B.; Nishi, K.; Monks, A.; Gorin, F. A.;
Bradbury, E. M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003,
309, 126; (b) Geschwind, J.-F.; Georgiades, C. S.; Ko, Y.
H.; Pedersen, P. L. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2004, 3,
449; (c) Laszlo, G. B.; Vay Liang, W. G.; Wai-Nang, P. L.
Pancreas 2003, 4, 368.
5. (a) Lu, Z. J.; Bohn, J.; Bergeron, R.; Deng, Q. L.;
Ellsworth, K. P.; Geissler, W. M.; Harris, G.; McCann,
P. E.; Mckeever, B.; Myers, R. W.; Saperstein, R.;
Willoughby, C. A.; Yao, J.; Chapman, K. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 4125; (b) Wright, S. W.; Rath, V.
L.; Genereux, P. E.; Hageman, D. L.; Levy, C. B.;
McClure, L. D.; McCoid, S. C.; McPherson, R. K.;
Schelhorn, T. M.; Wilder, D. E.; Zavadoski, W. J.;
Gibbs, E. M.; Treadway, J. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2005, 15, 459; (c) Treadway, J. L.; Mendys, P.;
Hoover, D. J. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2001, 10, 439,
and references therein; (d) Chrysina, E. D.; Kosmopo-
lou, M. N.; Tiraidis, C.; Kardarakis, R.; Bischler, N.;
Leonidas, D. D.; Hadady, Z.; Somsak, L.; Docsa, T.;
Gergely, P.; Oikonomakos, N. G. Protein Sci. 2005, 14,
873.
8
144
30
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Caffeine
393
66
19
1651
50
7
153
51
31
43
62
580
121
29
ndb
80
1707
63
580
114
a Values are means of three experiments.
b nd, not determined.
The effect of C-28 side-chain size could be clarified by a
comparison of 14 and 15. Compound 15 (IC50 = 7 lM)
is much more potent than 14 (IC50 = 50 lM). The only
structural difference between 14 and 15 is the length of
carbon side chain linked to the C-28 carboxyl, indicating
that the size of C-28 hydrophobic side chains affects the
enzyme inhibitory activity.
6. (a) Taniguchi, S.; Imayoshi, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Takama-
tsu, Y.; Ito, H.; Hatano, T.; Sakagami, H.; Tokuda, H.;
Nishino, H.; Sugita, D.; Shimura, S.; Yoshida, T. Phyto-
chemistry 2002, 59, 315; (b) Noriyasu, K.; Shinohara, G.
Toshiyuki, I.U.S. Patent Application: US 2003153538,
2002.
7. Xu, H. X.; Zeng, F. Q.; Wan, M.; Sim, K. Y. J. Nat. Prod.
1996, 59, 643.
8. Montilla, M. P.; Agil, A.; Navarro, M. C.; Jimenez, M. I.;
Garcia-Granados, A.; Parra, A.; Cabo, M. M. Planta
Med. 2003, 69, 472.
9. Shinohara, H.; Shinohara, G.; Noriyasu, K. PCT Patent:
WO 03011267, 2003.
Data analysis indicated no clear SAR for compounds
based on structural modifications at C-2 and C-3 posi-
tions of 1. In addition, no specific stereochemistry pre-
ferred by the enzyme could be inferred.
10. (a) Sun, H. B; Wen, X. A.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L. Y.; Wang, S.
Z.; Ni, P. Z. Chinese Patent Application: CN
200510038094.2, 2005; (b) Wen, X. A.; Sun, H. B.; Liu,
J.; Wu, G. Z.; Zhang, L. Y.; Wu, X. M.; Ni, P. Z. Bioorg.
Chem. Med. Lett. 2005, 15, 4944.
11. Takayama H.; Kitajima, M.; Ishizuka, T.; Seo S. U.S.
Patent Application: US2005020681 A1, 2005.
12. (a) Dvoretzky, I.; Richtern, G. H. J. Org. Chem. 1950, 15,
1285; (b) Machin, P. J.; Hurst, D. N.; Bradshaw, R. M.;
Blaber, L. C.; Burden, D. T.; Melaranget, R. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1984, 27, 503.
In summary, a series of maslinic acid derivatives have
been synthesized and evaluated as novel GP inhibi-
tors. Within this series of compounds, 15 was the
most potent GPa inhibitor (IC50 = 7 lM). A clear
preference for hydrophobic groups at C-28 is evident
for enzyme inhibition, which raises a challenge for
lead optimization based on 1 and related triterpenoids
since good water solubility is usually preferred for
drug design. A broader SAR study on triterpene class
of GP inhibitors is ongoing in our laboratory and will
be reported in due time.
13. Analytical data for 15: IR (KBr, cmÀ1) 3572, 3427, 2947,
1726, 1464, 1383, 1258, 1159, 1051, 1036; 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz): d 0.73, 0.83, 0.90, 0.93, 0.98, 1.03, 1.13 (each, 3H,
s), 2.85 (1H, dd, J = 4.2, 13.7 Hz, H-18), 2.99 (1H, d,
J = 9.5 Hz, H-3a), 3.43 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz, -CH2Br), 3.70
(1H, m, H-2b), 4.05 (2H, t, J = 6.2 Hz, –COOCH2–), 5.29
(1H, t, J = 3.5 Hz, H-12); EIMS: 629 [M+Na]+. Analytical
data for 20: IR (KBr, cmÀ1) 3570, 3429, 2945, 1724, 1464,
1383, 1259, 1161, 1051; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d
0.74, 0.83, 0.90, 0.92, 0.98, 1.03, 1.13 (each, 3H, s), 1.04 (6H,
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Jiangsu Natural Science
Foundation (Grant BK2005101) and Jiangsu Outstand-
ing Researcher Grant.