Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 4845-4848
Comparison of Two Molecular Design Strategies
for the Development of an Ammonium Ionophore
More Highly Selective than Nonactin
Shin-ichi Sasaki,† Tsuyoshi Amano,† Gou Monma,† Takeshi Otsuka,† Naoko Iwasawa,‡
Daniel Citterio,‡ Hideaki Hisamoto,†,§ and Koji Suzuki*,†,‡
Department of Applied Chemistry, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan, and Kanagawa
Academy of Science and Technology (KAST), KSP West-614, 3-2-1 Sakato, Kawasaki 213-0012, Japan
A series of ionophores for ammonium ion-selective elec-
trodes was designed and synthesized, and their charac-
teristics were examined. The design of the ionophores is
based on two different strategies: (1) introduction of bulky
blocking subunits (decalino groups) in 2 0 - or 2 1 -
membered crown ethers (TD20 C6 and TD2 1 C6 ), the ring
+
size of which is expected to be suitable for selective NH4
recognition, as compared to the slightly smaller K+; and
(2 ) preorganized tripodal ionophores based on a 6 -fold
Figure 1. Chemical structures of nonactin (a natural product that
substituted benzene ring in order to complementarily
is known as an ammonium ionophore) and TD19C6 (a synthetic
recognize the tetrahedral NH4 +, in contrast to the spheri-
ionophore that has a 19-membered crown ether with bulky subunits).
cal K+. Compared to nonactin, a natural product that is
+
used as a representative NH4 ionophore, the newly
NH4+/ Na+ selectivity while retaining the NH4+/ K+ selectivity
+
developed TD2 0 C6 showed higher NH4 selectivity over
pot
NH4 ,K
comparable to that of nonactin.2 The design principle of TD19C6
is based on the combination of two factors, namely, the ring size
of the crown ether suitable for the target cation (NH4+) and the
introduction of the bulky blocking subunits to interfere with the
complexation of other cations. A similar principle of molecular
design based on a tetramethylethano subunit was successfully
used in the development of Li+ and Na+ ionophores,3,4 but in the
case of TD19C6, the NH4+/ K+ selectivity was not improved
K+ while retaining the selectivity over Na+ (log
K
)
+
+
pot
-1 .5 and log
K
) -2 .5 ). On the other hand, a
+
+
NH4 ,Na
+
tripodal ionophore with pyrazole nitrogen atoms as NH4
binding sites showed high NH4 +/ K+ selectivity but suf-
pot
NH4 ,K
fered from increased Ca2 + interference (log
K
)
+
+
pot
-2 .1 and log
K
) -1 .6 ). As an overall conclu-
NH4 ,Ca2+
+
sion, the cyclic ionophores TD1 9 C6 and TD2 0 C6 are the
best ammonium-selective ionophores developed to date.
+
because of the similar ionic diameter of NH4 and K+. On the
+
other hand, Chin et al. focused on the different symmetry of NH4
Because of their application to chemical sensors in the field
of clinical or environmental analysis, the design and synthesis of
ammonium ionophores has received much attention during the
last two decades.1,2 Nonactin, a natural product shown in Figure
1, is the only available practically used ammonium ionophore at
and K+ for the design of an ionophore and were successful in
pot
high NH4 selectivity over K+ (log
K
) -2.6). However,
NH4 ,K
+
+
+
the developed ionophore still shows problems, such as low
sensitivity or strong pH dependence.5 Thiazole-containing benzo-
crown ethers6 or cage-type compounds7 have also been reported
as ammonium ionophores, and their characteristics have been
shown to be comparable or even superior to that of nonactin. In
this work, we designed and synthesized eight ionophores on the
+
present. However, the NH4 selectivity of nonactin over K+ or
Na+ is not perfectly sufficient for practical use, and the develop-
ment of a more highly selective ammonium ionophore as ion-
sensing component for ammonium ion-selective electrodes has
been desired. Recently, we developed a 19-membered crown ether
derivative (TD19C6) shown in Figure 1 and realized an excellent
+
basis of two different strategies for NH4 recognition and
(3) Suzuki, K.; Yamada, H.; Sato, K.; Watanabe, K.; Hisamoto, H.; Tobe, Y.;
Kobiro, K. Anal. Chem. 1 9 9 3 , 65, 3404.
(4) Suzuki, K.; Sato, K.; Hisamoto, H.; Siswanta, D.; Hayashi, K.; Kasahara, N.;
Watanabe, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Sasakura, H. Anal. Chem. 1 9 9 6 , 68, 208.
(5) Chin, J.; Walsdorff, C.; Stranix, B.; Oh, J.; Chung, H. J.; Park, S.-M.; Kim,
K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1 9 9 9 , 38, 2756.
(6) Kim, H.-S.; Park, H. J.; Oh, H. J.; Koh, Y. K.; Choi, J.-H.; Lee, D.-H.; Cha,
G. S.; Nam, H. Anal. Chem. 2 0 0 0 , 72, 4683.
(7) Jon, S. Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Park, S.-H.; Jeon, W. S.; Heo, J.; Kim, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2 0 0 1 , 40, 2116.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81-45-566-1568.
Fax: +81-45-564-5095. E-mail: suzuki@applc.keio.ac.jp.
† Keio University.
‡ Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology.
§ Present address: Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of
Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8566.
(1) Bu¨ hlmann, P.; Bakker, E.; Pretch, E. Chem. Rev. 1 9 9 8 , 98, 1593.
(2) Suzuki, K.; Siswanta, D.; Otsuka, T.; Amano, T.; Ikeda, T.; Hisamoto, H.;
Yoshihara, R.; Ohba, S. Anal. Chem. 2 0 00 , 72, 2200 and references therein.
10.1021/ac025713+ CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/10/2002
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 74, No. 18, September 15, 2002 4845