2252 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 78, No. 12 (2005)
Structure of Cationic SbTPP/Clay Composites
mony(V) bromide ([SbTPP(Br)2]þBrꢁ) was performed in MeOH–
MeCN (1:1 v/v) to give [SbTPP(Br)(OMe)]þBrꢁ. A MeCN–pyr-
idine solution (5:1 v/v 50 mL) containing [SbTPP(Br)(OMe)]þ-
Brꢁ (1.1 mmol) and N,N-dimethyl-3-amino-1-propanol (30 mmol)
was heated for 2 h at 65 ꢂC. The solvent was evaporated and the
residue was solved in CH2Cl2. The CH2Cl2 solution was washed
three times with 50 mL portions of H2O. After evaporation, the
crude product was chromatographed on silica gel (Fiji Silysia
BW-300) using CHCl3–MeOH (10:1 v/v) as an eluent to give
2a. For methylation of the dimethylamino group, MeI (32 mmol)
was added to a MeCN–pyridine solution (5:1 v/v 50 mL) of 2a
(1.1 mmol) and then heated for 2 h at 65 ꢂC. The purification of
1a was performed by a similar procedure for the case of 2a. Com-
plex 1b was basically synthesized by a similar procedure with the
synthesis of 1a. A MeCN–pyridine solution (5:1 v/v 50 mL) con-
taining [SbTPP(Br)(OMe)]þBrꢁ (1.1 mmol) and 2-(N,N-dimethyl-
Sumecton SA (SSA)
Mn+ = Na+ or Mg2+
1
+
OR
N
Mn+ Mn+
N
0.40 nm
Br −
Sb
N
N
2
Mn+ Mn+ Mn+
OR
1.75 nm
-
1
2
1a; R = -(CH ) -NMe
I
R = Me
2 3
3
-
1
2
1b; R = -(CH ) -O-(CH ) -NMe
I
R
= Me
2 2
2 2
3
1
2
2a; R = -(CH ) -NMe
R = -Me
2 3
2
1
2
2b; R = -(CH ) -O-(CH ) -NMe
R
= Me
2 2
2 2
2
1
2
1
2
3; R = R = H
4; R = R = Me
ꢂ
aminoethoxy)ethanol (30 mmol) was heated for 2 h at 65 C, and
then methylation of the dimethylamino group by MeI (32 mmol)
to give 1b.
Fig. 1. Structure of tetraphenylporphyrinatoantimony(V)
complexes and SSA.
3-Trimethylammoniopropoxo(methoxo)tetraphenylporphyrinato-
antimony(V) bromide (1a): Yield 94% from 2a; UV–vis (MeOH)
composite, revealing that the adsorption can be controlled by
the position and structure of an interactive site located in the
horizontal direction as well as the vertical direction for por-
phyrin plane. Since it was suggested that the effect of the axial
ligand on the formation of the SbTPP–SSA composites struc-
ture could be attributed to a strong interaction between an axial
ligand and the anionic clay sheets, the use of SbTPP having
organo cations as an axial ligand, which are known to undergo
interactions with the anionic clay sheets,39 can be a clue to
clarify the role of axial ligands in the SbTPP–SSA composites
system.
In this paper, we report on the adsorption and intercalation
behaviors of novel SbTPP 1 having an ammonium cationic part
as an axial ligand (Fig. 1) into SSA in order to elucidate the
relationships between the structure of the axial ligand and the
formation of the layer structure of SbTPP–SSA composites or
the SbTPP molecular orientation adsorbed into SSA sheets.
ꢂ
max/nm (log "): 419 (5.48), 551 (4.15), and 591 (3.93); SIMS:
m=z 881 (Mþ ꢁ 2); H NMR (CDCl3/ppm) ꢃ ꢁ2:59 (2H, t, J ¼
6:0 Hz, –OCH2–), ꢁ2:24 (3H, s, –OMe), ꢁ1:14 (2H, quint, J ¼
6:0 Hz, –CH2–), 0.89 (2H, t, J ¼ 6:0 Hz, –CH2–þN–), 2.18 (9H, s,
–þNMe3), 7.83–8.00 (12H, m, Ph), 8.24 (4H, d, J ¼ 6:6 Hz, Ph),
8.67 (4H, d, J ¼ 6:6 Hz, Ph), 9.58 (8H, s, pyrrole).
1
3-(Dimethylamino)propoxo(methoxo)tetraphenylporphyrinato-
antimony(V) bromide (2a): Yield 80%; UV–vis (MeOH) ꢂmax
/
nm (log "): 419 (5.58), 551 (4.25), and 591 (4.09); SIMS: m=z
866 (Mþ ꢁ 2); 1H NMR (CDCl3/ppm) ꢃ ꢁ2:65 (2H, t, J ¼ 6:2
Hz, –OCH2–), ꢁ2:29 (3H, s, –OMe), ꢁ1:58 (2H, quint, J ¼ 6:2
Hz, –CH2–), 0.20 (2H, t, J ¼ 6:2 Hz, –CH2–N–), 1.40 (6H, s,
–NMe2), 7.79–7.93 (12H, m, Ph), 8.23 (4H, d, J ¼ 6:7 Hz, Ph),
8.34 (4H, d, J ¼ 6:7 Hz, Ph), 9.48 (8H, s, pyrrole).
2-(2-Trimethylammonioethoxy)ethoxo(methoxo)tetraphenylpor-
phyrinatoantimony(V) bromide (1b): Yield 40%; UV–vis (MeOH)
ꢂ
max/nm (log "): 420 (5.68), 552 (4.29), and 591 (4.08); SIMS:
m=z 911 (Mþ); 1H NMR (CDCl3/ppm) ꢃ ꢁ2:40 (2H, t, J ¼ 4:7
Hz, Sb–OCH2–), ꢁ2:14 (3H, s, –OMe), 0.35 (2H, t, J ¼ 4:7 Hz,
–CH2–O–), 2.15 (2H, t, J ¼ 5:0 Hz, –CH2–þNMe3), 2.35 (9H, s,
–þNMe3), 2.60 (2H, t, J ¼ 5:0 Hz, –O–CH2–), 7.95–8.09 (12H,
m, Ph), 8.38–8.44 (8H, m, Ph), 9.69 (8H, s, pyrrole).
Experimental
Instruments. The UV–vis absorption spectra and fluorescence
spectra of solutions were measured on a Hitachi U2001 spectrom-
eter and on a Hitachi F4500 spectrometer, respectively. X-ray dif-
fraction spectra (XRD) were measured on a RIGAKU RINT2500
spectrometer (Cu Kꢁ, 40 kV/50 mA). IR spectra were measured
on a JASCO Herscel FT/IR-300 spectrometer. 1H NMR spectra
were taken in CDCl3 using tetramethylsilane as an internal stan-
dard on a Bruker AC 250P spectrometer at 250 MHz. Mass analy-
sis was carried out by mass spectroscopy (SIMS method) on a
Hitachi M-2000AM. Fluorescence spectra of powdered samples
were measured on a confocal laser scanning fluorescence micro-
scope (CLSM) (FV-300, Olympus) equipped with a spectro-
photometer (STFL 250, Seki Technotron).
2-(2-Dimethylaminoethoxy)ethoxo(methoxo)tetraphenylporphy-
rinatoantimony(V) bromide (2b): Yield 36%; UV–vis (MeOH)
ꢂ
max/nm (log "): 421 (5.68), 553 (4.29), and 593 (4.06); SIMS:
m=z 896 (Mþ); 1H NMR (CDCl3/ppm) ꢃ ꢁ2:45 (2H, t, J ¼ 4:7
Hz, Sb–OCH2–), ꢁ2:20 (3H, s, –OMe), 0.18 (2H, t, J ¼ 4:7 Hz,
–CH2–O–), 1.80 (2H, t, J ¼ 5:0 Hz, –CH2–NMe2), 1.87 (6H, s,
–NMe2), 2.80 (2H, t, J ¼ 5:0 Hz, –O–CH2–), 7.93–8.04 (12H,
m, Ph), 8.27–8.40 (8H, m, Ph), 9.57 (8H, s, pyrrole).
Results
Materials. Sumecton SA (SSA) was received from Kunimine
Industries Co., Ltd. and used without further purification. Water
was deionized below 0.02 mS cmꢁ1 of the conductivity with a
MILLIPORE Elix 3 system equipped with a RO membrane mod-
ule before use.
Synthesis of SbTPP Derivatives (1–4). The syntheses of 3
and 4 were performed according to a reported method.30 The syn-
theses of 1 and 2 were carried out by the following procedures.
The mono-methanolysis of dibromo(tetraphenylporphyrinato)anti-
Preparation of SbTPP–SSA Composites. SbTPP–SSA
composites were prepared by mixing an aqueous SSA colloidal
solution with the respective aqueous 1–4 solutions under son-
ication at room temperature. The SSA concentration was set to
50 mg dmꢁ3 unless otherwise noted. The concentration of
anionic sites in a colloidal solution of SSA was calculated to
be 5:0 ꢃ 10ꢁ5 mol dmꢁ3 from the cation exchange capacity
(CEC) value of SSA.22