S. T. McCarron et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 2395–2398
2397
offer new tools to spatially limit protein modification for the pur-
pose of protein tracking on cells and will add another versatile tool
to the arsenal of spatially- and temporarily-controlled protein
labeling bioorganic chemistry.
General information
All reagents were purchased through Fisher Scientific (Fair
Lawn, NJ, USA). Merck silica gel (35–70 mesh) was used for flash
chromatography. NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz Bruker
NMR spectrometer using the residual proton resonance of the sol-
vent as the standard for proton spectra and the carbon signal of the
deuterated solved as the internal standard for carbon spectra.
Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm). When peak
multiplicities are given, the following abbreviations are used: s,
singlet; br s, broad singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, mul-
tiplet. Mass spectra were measured on a Waters ZQ device for
LRMS while HRMS data was collected at the University of Massa-
chusetts Mass Facility which is supported, in part, by the National
Science Foundation. The colorimetric absorption measurements
were made on an Evolution 100 UV/vis spectrometer.
Figure 2. Photographs of alkylation reactions post-workup. (a) 2-chloro-N,N-
dimethylethylamine incubated with NBP at 30 min, (b) caged molecule 1 irradiated
at 365 nm for 1 min and incubated with NBP for 30 min, and (c) caged molecule 1
non-irradiated with NBP at 30 min. The top, color-containing layer is the ethyl
acetate extract that is normally analyzed via UV/vis.
to the solution of 1 that was maintained in the dark was discovered
upon work-up and analysis (data not shown).
Upon photoinitiated release of 2-chloro-N,N-dimethylethyl-
amine from the coumarin cage, NBP alkylation occurred efficiently
and was quite similar in reaction rate to the uncaged 2-chloro-N,
N-dimethylethylamine as determined by sampling over the course
of the incubation. The photoinitiated release of 2-chloro-N,N-dim-
ethylethylamine, we believe, allows the aziridinium formation to
begin at a prescribed time and results in identical alkylation of
the NBP reporter molecule.
Next, we investigated the selectivity of the photo-initiated re-
lease of 2-chloro-N,N-dimethylethylamine towards four amino
acids that represent biologically-relevant potential nucleophiles.34
For all experiments the N-terminus of the amino acids used were
Fmoc-protected to discourage the alkylation of the free amine ver-
Acknowledgments
A portion of this work is related to a Grant from the Human Fron-
tier Science Program (RGY0066/2008). S.T.M. was supported by
start-up funding from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst to
J.J.C. M.F. was supported by a NIH Traineeship administered through
the Chemical–Biology Interface Program at UMA (5T32GM008515).
The authors would like to thank Professors Nathan Schnarr and
Dhandapani Venkataraman for helpful discussion.
sus the side chain functional groups. As
a positive control,
2-chloro-N,N-dimethylethylamine hydrochloride was incubated
with Fmoc-serine, lysine, arginine, or cysteine for 2 h at 37 °C
and pH 7.4 in 2.5 mL of PBS/DMSO (4:1) solution. After 2 h of incu-
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
bation, 50 lL of the reaction mixture was diluted to 1 mL in meth-
anol and analyzed by LC/MS. Under these conditions only cysteine
was found to be alkylated (MW = 415.2). Likewise, caged 1 was
incubated with of each Fmoc-protected amino acid under the same
References and notes
conditions in the dark. After 2 h of incubation, 50 lL of the reaction
mixture was diluted to 1 mL in methanol and analyzed by LC/MS.
The mass corresponding to the alkylated amino acids were not
found under these conditions. In addition, the mass corresponding
to unreacted caged 1 was present, indicating that the cage was not
reactive to the buffer at a detectible level. However, under the
same reaction conditions following exposure to 1 min of 365 nm
light, the mass corresponding to the alkylated amino acids was
only found in the case of cysteine (MW = 415.2). This finding
parallels the results from the positive control experiment with
2-chloro-N,N-dimethylethylamine.
In summary, we have developed a convenient method for the
photoinitiated release of the pro-electrophilic moiety 2-chloro-
N,N-dimethylethylamine that can form N,N-dimethylaziridinium
in situ. While our data does not conclusively confirm the produc-
tion of the aziridinium moiety, we have shown that our caged mol-
ecule is essentially unreactive before the release of light. In future
studies, we plan to synthesize a similar molecule that contains a li-
gand and a propargyl group to allow for the electrophilic attach-
ment to a protein of interest. This alkyne can then be used in a
subsequent 3+2 click reaction for the attachment of an azido-based
fluorophore or biotin. The present molecular system that is the
subject of this manuscript is chemically-inert when kept in the
dark and is stable in phosphate-buffered saline solution for
>30 days at room temperature. The reactive species is only gener-
ated after light is applied to unmask the tertiary amine. The appli-
cation of this technology to protein labeling studies could soon
1. Lapinsky, D. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 6237.
2. Wombacher, R.; Cornish, V. W. J. Biophotonics 2011, 4, 391.
3. Puliti, D.; Warther, D.; Orange, C.; Specht, A.; Goeldner, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2011, 19, 1023.
4. Loving, G. S.; Sainlos, M.; Imperiali, B. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 73.
5. Betzig, E.; Patterson, G. H.; Sougrat, R.; Lindwasser, O. W.; Olenych, S.;
Bonifacino, J. S.; Davidson, M. W.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J.; Hess, H. F. Science
2006, 313, 1642.
6. Lacoste, T. D.; Michalet, X.; Pinaud, F.; Chemla, D. S.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Weiss, S.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 9461.
7. Shroff, H.; White, H.; Betzig, E. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2008, Chapter 4. Unit 4.21.
8. Griffin, B. Albert; Adams, Stephan R.; Tsien, R. Y. Science 1998, 281, 269.
9. Halo, T. L.; Appelbaum, J.; Hobert, E. M.; Balkin, D. M.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 438.
10. Lin, M. Z.; Wang, L. Physiology 2008, 23, 131.
11. Vytla, D.; Combs-Bachmann, R. E.; Hussey, A. M.; Hafez, I.; Chambers, J. J. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 7151.
12. Tamura, T.; Tsukiji, S.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2216.
13. Tsukiji, S.; Miyagawa, M.; Takaoka, Y.; Tamura, T.; Hamachi, I. Nat. Chem. Biol.
2009, 5, 341.
14. Lord, S. J.; Lee, H. L.; Moerner, W. E. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2192.
15. Knowles, J. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 155.
16. Chambers, J. J.; Gouda, H.; Young, D. M.; Kuntz, I. D.; England, P. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 13886.
17. Kamiya, H. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 6517.
18. Dorman, G.; Prestwich, G. D. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 5661.
19. Brunner, J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1993, 62, 483.
20. Brookes, P.; Lawley, P. D. Biochem. J. 1961, 80, 496.
21. Rink, S. M.; Hopkins, P. B. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 1439.
22. Pearlstein, R. A.; Tripathy, S. K.; Potenzone, R. J.; Malhotra, D.; Hopfinger, A. J.;
Klopman, G.; Max, N. Biopolymers 1980, 19, 311.
23. Bardos, T. J.; Datta-Gupta, N.; Hebborn, P.; Triggle, D. J. J. Med. Chem. 1965, 8,
167.