optimized. The enantiomeric excess (ee) of the product was
determined by chiral HPLC analysis.12 Control experiments
revealed that the enantiomeric methyl mandelate does not
racemize under the employed reaction conditions even at 72
°C.
ln(kS/kR) ) ln[(100 + % ee)/(100 - % ee)]
ln(kS/kR) ) ∆∆SqS-R/R - ∆∆HqS-R/RT
(1)
(2)
As can be seen from the differential Eyring equation (eq
2),14-16 the enantioselectivity in an asymmetric reaction is
determined in general by a balance of the enthalpy and
entropy terms. The unique temperature dependence profiles
obtained with 1c and 1d (and anticipated for the other NADH
models) imply that not only the enthalpic but also the
entropic contributions are significant in the enantiodifferen-
tiating reduction step of this reaction, as was the case with
the other photochemical and catalytic asymmetric reactions
reported previously.14-17
The temperature effects on the product’s ee are illustrated
in Figure 2, where the natural logarithm of the relative rate
To understand the nature of the present temperature effect,
the differential activation enthalpy (∆∆Hq
) ∆∆Hq
-
S-R
S
∆∆Hq ) and entropy (∆∆Sq
) ∆∆Sq - ∆∆Sq ) values
R
S-R
S
R
were calculated by applying eq 2 to the plots in Figure 2.
As shown in Table 1, the ∆∆Sq
values are not equal to
S-R
zero. Especially, the ∆∆SqS-R values for 1c (-3.75 cal/mol)
and 1d (+1.89 cal/mol) are comparably large to those
observed in the enantiodifferentiating photoisomerization of
cyclooctene.17 These large ∆∆Sq
values are thought to
S-R
be due to large activation volume variations caused by the
broader movement sphere of the benzyl group (for 1c) and
the flipping action of the pyrrolidine ring (for 1d). Moreover,
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of the enantioselectivity in the
asymmetric reduction of methyl benzoylformate with 1a (closed
circle; r (correlation coefficient) ) 0.983), 1b (closed square; r )
0.973), 1c (closed triangle; r ) 0.989), 1d (open circle; r ) 0.980),
and 1e (open square; r ) 0.990).
the ∆∆Hq
and ∆∆Sq
values were found to have the
S-R
S-R
same sign. These factors are jointly responsible for the unique
temperature-dependent ee changes, i.e., the switching of the
product’s chirality at certain temperatures and the ee
enhancement at higher temperatures.14,17
Ohno et al. previously proved the significant contribution
made by the entropy term in the asymmetric reduction with
simple NADH models.18 However, they employed inherently
chiral 4-substituted NADH models possessing a methyl at
C4, and the asymmetric reduction of benzoquinones was
conducted in the absence of the magnesium ion. Our present
study provides the first example of the entropy-controlled
asymmetric reduction with NADH models, which do not
carry a stereogenic center at the C4 but form a ternary
complex with the substrate organized by the magnesium ion,
thus constituting one of the simplest biomimetic asymmetric
reduction systems using 1,4-dihydronicotinamides. Moreover,
the present study provides the first example of chirality
inversion instigated by the reaction temperature in a biomi-
metic reduction. Product-chirality switching phenomena
caused by temperature have recently been reported for chiral
photochemical reactions14,16,19 and less frequently for thermal
reactions, such as desymmetrization with chiral organotin
catalysts15 and the enzymatic kinetic resolution of racemic
secondary alcohols,20 but the same phenomenon has never
been observed in a biomimetic reduction.
constant for the formation of (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-methyl
mandelate, i.e., the ln(kS/kR) value calculated by eq 1,14 is
plotted as a function of the reciprocal temperature to give a
good straight line in each case. When the reduction was
conducted with 1a (R ) Ala-OMe), (S)-methyl mandelate
was predominantly obtained, whereas the reduction with 1b
(Val-OMe) and 1e (PhG-OMe) gave the (R)-enantiomer (at
least in the temperature range employed). This clearly
demonstrates that the achiral substituent at the stereogenic
center significantly affects the stereochemical outcome of
the asymmetric reduction and can cause the inversion of the
product’s chirality, as revealed by simply replacing the
methyl in 1a with isopropyl (1b) or phenyl (1e) which leads
to the inversion of the product’s chirality. It is also
noteworthy that the product’s ee is improved not by lowering
but by raising the temperature, as can be seen with 1c (Phe-
OMe) in the temperature range employed. Of particular
interest is the discovery that the major enantiomer produced
with 1d (Pro-OMe) is switched from (R)- to (S)-methyl
mandelate at around 0 °C, and thereafter, the ee continues
to increase as the temperature is further elevated. It should
be emphasized that the enantiodifferentiation mechanism is
unchanged over the whole temperature range in the present
system because, in each case, all the plots fit to a single
straight line over the temperature range.15
(15) Otera, J.; Sakamoto, K.; Tsukamoto, T.; Orita, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 3201-3204.
(16) Poon, T.; Sivaguru, J.; Franz, R.; Jockusch, S.; Martinez, C.;
Washington, I.; Adam, W.; Inoue, Y.; Turro, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 10498-10499
(17) Inoue, Y.; Ikeda, H.; Kaneda, M.; Sumiura, T.; Everitt, S. R. L.;
Wada, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 406-407.
(18) Ohno, A.; Goto, M.; Mitaka, Y.; Kashiwagi, T.; Murayama, T. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64, 87-90.
(14) (a) Inoue, Y. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 741-770. (b) Inoue, Y.;
Ramamurthy, V. Chiral Photochemistry; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2004.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 10, 2006
2069