sequence. Treatment of 14 with 3.0 equiv of diethylzinc-
derived organocuprate at -40 °C, and subsequent phosphate
cleavage, led to formation of a single product 15. Using the
aforementioned Karplus analysis of the resulting acetonide
of 15, unambiguous assignment of anti-relationship was
established.
Scheme 5. Methylation/Phosphate Cleavage
The regioselectivity of cuprate displacement in 14 is most
surprising in that the requisite conformer F leading to product
15 (Scheme 7) contains an unfavorable A1,3 interaction
generated by the gem-dimethyl moiety. However, the ob-
served selectivity is consistent with the results obtained with
12, in which the cuprate displaces the more substituted
phosphate leaving group. Since the Corey model for cuprate
addition predicts significant bond breakage through σ*, the
lower energy σ* (i.e., the most substituted carbon) in the
asynchronous concerted transition state dictates the reaction
pathway over substantial A1,3 steric interactions.
In rationalizing and summarizing regio- and diastereo-
selective cuprate additions with symmetric 1 and unsym-
metric phosphates 12 and 15, both steric and stereoelectronic
effects appear to play major roles. In the case of 12 and 15,
cuprate displacements proceeded via the more substituted
σ* positions, secondary and tertiary, respectively. When σ*
energies are equivalent as in 1, allylic strain appears to govern
the cuprate addition.
was thus anticipated. Dioxaphosphacycle 11 was generated
via the coupling of one equivalent of allylic alcohol 3 with
allyldiphenyl phosphate, followed by RCM to afford 11 in
good yields over two steps (Scheme 6). Treatment of 11 with
Scheme 6. Unsymmetric Monocyclic Phosphates
In conclusion, monocyclic phosphates undergo a highly
selective anti-SN2′ allylic phosphate displacement. Subse-
quent cleavage affords an array of syn-(E)-homoallylic
alcohols when pseudo-C2-symmetric monocyclic phosphates
are employed. In extending this method to unsymmetric
phosphates, cuprate addition proceeded through the more
substituted allylic phosphate position (lower σ* energy) with
the general reactivity pattern being 1 < 2 < 3, allowing
access to anti-configured homoallylic alcohols. In probing
these systems, the Corey mechanism for allylic organocuprate
displacements was examined and further substantiated.
3.0 equiv of diethylzinc-derived organocuprates, and sub-
sequent phosphate cleavage, led to formation of a single
product 12 produced via cuprate displacement at the second-
ary allylic phosphate position. In contrast to 1, no dominant
conformational preferences exist between the two described
reactive conformations of 11, indicating that regioselectivity
is dictated by electronic effects, vide infra.
This intriguing result led us to explore yet a third
paradigm, the unsymmetric cyclic phosphate 14, containing
both secondary and tertiary allylic phosphate positions
(Scheme 7). Phosphate 14 was assembled via differential
coupling of secondary allylic alcohol 3 and 2-methylbut-3-
en-2-ol with dichloromethyl phosphate. The resulting labile
acyclic phosphate was immediately subjected to metathesis
affording phosphate 14 in moderate yields over the two-step
Acknowledgment. This investigation was generously
supported by funds provided by the Petroleum Research Fund
(PRF 42457-AC, administered by the American Chemical
Society), the National Science Foundation (NSF CHE-
0503875), and the NIH Dynamic Aspects in Chemical
Biology Training Grant (A.W.). We thank Dr. David Vander
Velde and Sarah Neuenswander for assistance with NMR
measurements and Dr. Todd Williams for HRMS analysis.
We kindly acknowledge Daiso Co., Ltd., Fine Chemical
Department for donating 100 g of each antipode of both
benzyl- and trityl-protected glycidols (e-mail: akkimura@
daiso.co.jp) and Materia, Inc., for supplying metathesis
catalyst and helpful suggestions. In addition, we thank the
reviewers for helpful suggestions.
Scheme 7. Unsymmetric Monocyclic Phosphates
Note Added after ASAP Publication. The PRF number in
the Acknowledgment was incorrect in the version published
September 29, 2006; the corrected version was published
October 3, 2006.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details
and spectroscopic data of new compounds 1 and 4-15 are
reported. This material is available free of charge via the
OL061756R
5028
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 22, 2006