J.Y. Jung et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 42 (2007) 1044e1048
1047
Table 1
Diastreoselectivity of asymmetric cycloaddition
D3 receptor over the D4 receptor than (S)-(ꢀ)-1, 2 ligands. Fur-
ther studies on the synthesis of other chiral piperazinylpropyli-
soxazoline compounds employing this route are in progress.
Entry
Dipolarophile
Configurationa
Deb of 7 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
a
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
R
S
70
40
4
Acknowledgments
R
R
S
16
2
This work was supported by the grant from Sungshin Wom-
en’s University in 2006. We thank Dr. Jaekyun Lee and Dr.
Yong Seo Cho at the Korea Institute of Science and Technol-
ogy for the X-ray structure determination.
Configuration of the major cycloadduct at the new stereogenic center.
Determined by 19F NMR analysis of MTPA esters 7.
b
Combination of (S)-10 and (R)-10 isomer with two amines 11
under the well established reaction conditions [4] gave four
enantiomerically pure isomers, i.e. (S)-(ꢀ)-1, (S)-(ꢀ)-2, (R)-
(þ)-1, and (R)-(þ)-2 in 92e96% yields. All enantiomers
were obtained with a high optical purity (>99% ee), which
was determined by HPLC (Chiral Pak AD column, 1 mL/
min, 2-propanol:hexane ¼ 2:8, 254 nm).
References
[1] P. Sokoloff, B. Giros, M.-P. Martres, M.-L. Bouthenet, J.-C. Schwartz,
Nature 347 (1990) 146.
[2] H.M. Van Tol, J.R. Bunzow, H.C. Guan, R.K. Sunahara, P. Seeman,
H.B. Niznik, O. Civelli, Nature 30 (1991) 610.
[3] (a) C. Enguehard-Gueiffier, H. Hubner, A. El Hakmaoui, H. Allouchi,
¨
P. Gmeiner, A. Argiolas, M.R. Melis, A. Gueiffier, J. Med. Chem. 49
(2006) 3938;
The prepared chiral isomers were evaluated in vitro for
dopamine D2eD4 receptors binding affinity by measuring
their ability to displace radioligands ([3H]spiperone for D2
and D4, [3H]YM-09151-2 for D3) from the cloned human
dopamine receptors D2long, D3 and D4.2 which were expressed
in CHO cells. Table 2 shows the binding data of the prepared
target chiral compounds.
(b) S. Lober, H. Hubner, P. Gmeiner, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006)
2955;
¨
¨
(c) P. Mohr, M. Decker, C. Enzensperger, J. Lehmann, J. Med. Chem. 49
(2006) 2110;
(d) M. Leopoldo, E. Lacivita, N.A. Colabufo, F. Beradi, R. Perrone, J.
Pharm. Pharmacol. 58 (2006) 209;
(e) J. Chen, K. Ding, B. Levant, S. Wang, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16
(2006) 443;
Of the chiral isomers, (R)-(þ)-1 also exhibited high binding
affinity with Ki value of 2.1 nM and high selectivity for D3
receptor over D4 receptor. In addition, it exhibited moderate
(38-fold higher) selectivity for D3 receptor versus D2 receptor.
Similarly, for (R)-(þ)-2, the high binding affinity with Ki value
of 2.1 nM for D3 receptor was also observed. In comparison
with (R)-enantiomers, (S)-(ꢀ)-1 and (S)-(ꢀ)-2, showed lower
binding affinity with the Ki values of 20 nM and 5.1 nM,
respectively, for the D3 receptor. In addition, the (S)-(ꢀ)-iso-
mers exhibited lower selectivity for the D3 receptor over the
D4 receptor and for the D3 receptor versus the D2 receptor.
(f) D. Lentz, F. Boeckler, H. Hubner, P. Gmeiner, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13
¨
(2005) 4434;
(g) X. Wang, P.A. Bhatia, J.F. Daanen, S.P. Latsaw, J. Rhode, T. Kolsa,
A.A. Hakeem, M.A. Matulenko, M. Nakane, M.E. Uchic, L.N. Miller,
R. Chang, R.B. Moreland, J.D. Brioni, A.O. Stewart, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 13 (2005) 4667;
(h) K. Ding, J. Chen, M. Ji, X. Wu, J. Varady, C.Y. Yang, Y. Lu,
J.R. Deschamps, B. Levant, S. Wang, J. Med. Chem. Lett. 48 (2005)
3171;
(i) L. Bettinetti, S. Lober, H. Hubner, P. Gmeiner, J. Comb. Chem. 7
¨
¨
(2005) 309;
(j) M. Ji, J. Chen, K. Ding, X. Wu, J. Varady, B. levant, S. Wang, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1701;
(k) W. Chu, Z. Tu, E. McElveen, J. Xu, M. Taylor, R.R. Luedtke,
R.H. March, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13 (2005) 77.
3. Conclusions
[4] (a) K.H. Kang, A.N. Pae, K.I. Choi, Y.S. Cho, B.Y. Chung, J.E. Lee,
S.H. Jung, H.Y. Koh, H.-Y. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 1057;
(b) M.Y. Cha, B.C. Choi, K.H. Kang, A.N. Pae, K.I. Choi, Y.S. Cho,
H.Y. Koh, H.-Y. Lee, D. Jung, J.Y. Kong, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12
(2002) 1327;
In conclusion, the synthesis of chiral piperazinylpropyli-
soxazoline analogues, (R)-(þ)-1, 2 and (S)-(ꢀ)-1, 2 was ac-
complished through a seven-step sequence of reactions. Key
steps involved (1) asymmetric 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition using
Oppolzer’s chiral sultams as chiral auxiliaries, (2) alkyl chain
extension of triflates 8 to esters 9, and (3) reductive amination
of aldehydes 10 with piperazines 11. Chiral ligands (R)-(þ)-1,
2 exhibited the higher binding affinity and selectivity for the
(c) For in vitro metabolic stability and identification of metabolites, see
J. Lee, J. Son, H.Y. Koh, A.N. Pae, D.H. Kim, Anal. Biochem. 313
(2003) 292;
(d) H.Y. Koh, K. Choi, Y.S. Cho, A.N. Pae, J.Y. Kong, D.Y. Jeong, S.H.
Jung, H.Y. Lee, Brit. UK Pat. Appl., GB 2369617 A1, 2002, 0605.
[5] J.Y. Jung, S.H. Jung, H.Y. Koh, A.N. Pae, W.K. Park, J.Y. Kong, Bull.
Korean Chem. Soc. 27 (2006) 1861.
Table 2
Binding affinity (Ki, nM) [12]
[6] (a) A. Padwa, 1, 3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry, vols. 1 and 2, John-
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984;
(b) D.P. Curran, Advances in Cycloaddition, vol. 1, 1988, pp. 129;
Compounds
D2 (Ki, nM) D3 (Ki, nM) D4 (Ki, nM) D2/D3 D4/D3
(c) V. Jager, I. Muller, Tetrahedron 41 (1985) 3519;
¨
¨
(R)-(þ)-1
(S )-(ꢀ)-1
(R)-(þ)-2
(S )-(ꢀ)-2
Haloperidola
a
80
400
46
2.1
20
426
483
507
225
103
38
20
22
14
203
24
(d) A. Studer, D.P. Curran, Tetrahedron 53 (1997) 6681;
(e) For a review on asymmetric 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, see: K.V.
Gothelf, L.A. Jorgensen Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 863.
2.1
5.1
6.4
241
44
70
[7] (a) D.P. Curran, T.A. Heffner, J. Org. Chem. 55 (1990) 4585;
(b) K.S. Kim, B.H. Kim, W.M. Park, S.J. Cho, B.J. Mhin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 115 (1993) 7472;
3.3
0.5
16
Reference drug.