Organic Letters
Letter
leads to significant decompositionlikely through quinone
methide formation.16 For example, while trace amounts of 2h
could be isolated, replacing the methyl group of 1h with a
methoxy group led to complete decomposition of the product
(data not shown). While methyl proved general at the 3-
position (1b−1h), longer alkyl chains could be installed. For
example, internal alkenes were tolerated (1i, 1j) with the
tetrahydroisoquinoline isolated as the major products (2i, 2j).
However, the 7-membered ring products were also detected,
complicating analysis. Overall, the activating effect of the
aromatic ring needs to be carefully weighed against rearrange-
ments and side product formation.
step and does not require the preinstallation of nitrogen. The
aromatic backbone can be altered with varying substitution
patterns from the choice of building blocks used. This method
provides a simple approach to access 3-substituted tetrahy-
drosoquinolines and is complementary to classic approaches to
synthesize this valuable heterocycle.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
We next investigated the composition of the sulfonamide
nucleophile (Table 3). o-Toluenesulfonamide (5a) gave yields
Experimental details, compound characterization and
Table 3. Evaluation of Sulfonamide Nucleophiles
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
ORCID
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We acknowledge funds from Indiana University in partial
support of this work. Andrew P. Quest is acknowledged for his
reaction scale-up assistance. We also gratefully acknowledge
the NSF CAREER Award (CHE-1254783) and NIH
(GM121840) for partial support of this work. Eli Lilly & Co.
and Amgen supported this work through the Lilly Grantee
Award and the Amgen Young Investigator Award. P.T.M. was
supported by the Graduate Training Program in Quantitative
and Chemical Biology (T32GM109825). We acknowledge IU
mass spectrometry for HRMS (NSF Grant No. CHE1726633).
REFERENCES
■
(1) Scott, J. D.; Williams, R. M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1669−1730.
(2) Bentley, K. W. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 444−463.
(3) Singh, I. P.; Shah, P. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2017, 27, 17−36.
(4) Zein, A. L.; Valluru, G.; Georghiou, P. E., Recent Asymmetric
Syntheses of Tetrahydroisoquinolines Using “Named” and Some
Other Newer Methods. In Bioactive Natural Products; Elsevier, 2012;
pp 53−80.
(5) Chrzanowska, M.; Rozwadowska, M. D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104,
3341−3370.
(6) Pictet, A.; Spengler, T. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1911, 44, 2030−
2036.
similar to that of p-toluenesulfonamide, affording 6a in 55%
yield. More sterically bulky 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzenesulfona-
mide (5b) gave a higher regiomeric ratio with a stronger
preference to form the tetrahydroisoquinoline product (6b).
Placing a methoxy on the sulfonamide (5c) had little effect on
the yield of the reaction. Decreasing the nucleophilicity of
nitrogen by placing an electron-withdrawing nitro (5d) or
trifluoromethyl (5e) group on the sulfonamide, however,
significantly decreased the yield of the reaction. In addition,
heteroaryl 2-thiophenesulfonamide (5f) also performed well in
the reaction. Overall, the sulfonamide scope proved relatively
general and synthetically useful.
The novel annulation method described here offers access to
tetrahydroisoquinolines from starting material devoid of
nitrogen. The iron-catalyzed tandem alcohol substitution and
hydroamination using a sulfonamide nucleophile provides an
unusual disconnection for an annulation approach to this
heterocyclic core. Starting from a benzylic alcohol and an
alkene, this approach forms two bonds in a single synthetic
(7) Cox, E. D.; Cook, J. M. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1797−1842.
(8) Julian, L. D.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13813−
13822.
(9) Bender, C. F.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2741−
2743.
(10) Henderson, L.; Knight, D. W.; Williams, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2012, 53, 4657−4660.
(11) Shigehisa, H.; Koseki, N.; Shimizu, N.; Fujisawa, M.; Niitsu,
M.; Hiroya, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13534−13537.
(12) Brenzovich, W. E.; Benitez, D.; Lackner, A. D.; Shunatona, H.
P.; Tkatchouk, E.; Goddard, W. A.; Toste, F. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 5519−5522.
(13) Hopkins, B. A.; Wolfe, J. P. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 4840−4844.
́
́
(14) Marquez-Segovia, I.; Baeza, A.; Otero, A.; Najera, C. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2013, 2013, 4962−4970.
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX