Please cite this article in press as: Liu et al., Site-Selective C–H Benzylation of Alkanes with N-Triftosylhydrazones Leading to Alkyl Aromatics,
ll
Article
Figure 3. Substrate Scope of the Silver-Catalyzed C(sp3)–H Insertion
Reaction conditions: N-Triftosylhydrazone (0.3 mmol), NaH (0.6 mmol), [TpBr3Ag]2 (2.5 mol %), alkane (5.0 mL) and CH2Cl2 (5.0 mL), 60ꢀC, 48 h, under an
argon atmosphere. For compounds 8–10, 12–14, 26–28, and 59, 5.0 mol % [TpBr3Ag]2 was used. For compounds 42–45, 2.0 equiv alkane was used. The
r.r. of 3ꢀ and 2ꢀ C–H insertion was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude material. For 60, 2:1 refers to selectivities toward the
tertiary and secondary sites of cis-decalin. All yields are isolated yields.
selectivity (Figure 3B). Both symmetric and unsymmetric alkanes were found to un-
dergo highly selective tertiary C–H alkylation with hydrazone 1a, affording the
desired alkylarenes (29–32, 34, and 35) in generally high yields. The exception was
an alkane featuring a tert-butyl group on the carbon atom adjacent to the tertiary
center (33) where no reaction was observed, emphasizing the sensitivity of the sys-
tem to the steric environment around the tertiary site (c.f. 31,32 versus 33). This
was further confirmed by the absence of benzyl C–H bond insertion products (the re-
action of cumene afforded the corresponding insertion product in only 10% NMR
yield, for details see Figure S2). In the absence of a tertiary C–H bond, functionaliza-
tion of secondary C–H sites also proved possible; for example, n-hexane underwent
high-yielding insertion (82%) but displayed relatively poor secondary site selectivity
(36, C2:C3 = 3:1 r.r.). The reaction of 2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane, which fea-
tures subtly different tertiary centers, afforded insertion products at both 3ꢀ C–H
bonds, with a modest favoring of the less hindered position (37). Nonetheless, this
result further illustrates the power of the [TpBr3Ag]2 catalyst in donor carbene inser-
tion into the tertiary sites of unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds, irrespective of the number
of other C–H bonds. It is also noteworthy that the alkylarene products of all these
reactions would be inaccessible through traditional Friedel-Crafts alkylation using
primary haloalkanes due to competing rearrangements, polysubstitution, or mis-
matched regiodirecting effects.56
Pleasingly, the reaction could be readily extended to secondary and tertiary C–H
bonds for a range of cycloalkanes (Figure 3C). The formation of secondary carbene
C–H insertion products of 5–8-membered rings proceeded in excellent yield
(38–41); on the other hand, the reaction of N-triftosylhydrazones with adamantane
and 1,3-dimethyladamantane afforded only the tertiary C–H bridgehead insertion
products 42–45 (55%–83% yield) with no observation of reaction at the secondary
C–H bonds. This result further emphasizes the exquisite site selectivity for tertiary
C–H bonds in the absence of steric effects, regardless of the number of secondary
C–H bonds. The scope of secondary C–H insertion was further explored using
various N-triftosylhydrazones and cyclohexane, which furnished the corresponding
alkylated products 46–59 in good to excellent yields. Interestingly, carbene insertion
into cis-decalin produced both tertiary and secondary CÀH insertion products 60 in
66% yield with 2:1 ratio favoring the former. Conversely, trans-decalin only pro-
duced secondary CÀH insertion products, potentially due to 1,3-diaxial interactions
in this conformational locked system (for details see Figures S2–S4) Also noteworthy
is the compatibility of the catalytic system with ketone-derived N-triftosylhydra-
zones, albeit in these cases only donor/acceptor carbenes (featuring an electron-
withdrawing group CO2Me or CF3 adjacent to the hydrazone) produced C–H inser-
tion products in excellent yields (61 and 62). In their absence, the reaction failed to
yield even trace amounts of the desired product (e.g., 63), which demonstrated that
the additional electron-donating group greatly attenuated the electrophilicity of
carbene. However, the donor carbenes do not yet match donor/acceptor carbenes
in terms of scope, selectivity, and functional group compatibility.35,36 For example,
substrates containing other functionalities such as bromo and ester functional
groups (1-bromo-3-methylbutane and 4-methylpentyl hexanoate) only yield trace
6
Chem 6, 1–15, August 6, 2020