of amount of trypsin leached out shows that 89% of trypsin
leached out during PEG solution treatment (ESIw).10a These
results conclusively show that encapsulated trypsin in the
hierarchically porous silica material functions as an efficient
bio-catalyst and can be reused several times without loss of
activity.
In summary, we have reported a facile and efficient route for
the development of hierarchical mesoporous materials and its
application in the encapsulation of enzymes. The encapsulated
enzyme functions as an efficient biocatalyst. In general, the
method can be used for the encapsulation of other enzymes
of interest. Such encapsulated enzymes can be used in the
development of continuous flow bio-reactors. Further, chemo-
selective reactions can be achieved by the modification of inner
pores surface of MSNs which can act as a gate-keeper for the
substrates. Such efforts are under way in our laboratory.
S. S. G. acknowledges Sushma Kumari for confocal images,
and DST, New Delhi (Grant No: SR/S1/PC-56/2008) for
funding. B. M. acknowledge CSIR, New Delhi for fellowship.
Fig. 2 Activity of trypsin encapsulated or immobilized on different
silica materials using 2 mM BAPNA in 50 mM, pH 8 tris buffer.
The spectroscopy data of various hierarchical mesoporous
materials discussed above indicates successful formation of
hierarchical mesoporous materials and encapsulation of enzyme
in the large pores of this material via CuAAC approach.
To investigate the activity of the encapsulated trypsin,
Trypsin-SBA-MSN was treated with 2 mM BAPNA in tris
buffer (50 mM, pH 8).10c The activity of the encapsulated
trypsin was found to be 44 mmol gÀ1 minÀ1 and remained
almost constant even after 10 cycles. (Fig. 2) This shows that
the enzyme is active and remains encapsulated efficiently. This
encapsulated enzyme has comparable activity with the activity
of the physically adsorbed trypsin on post synthetic functio-
nalized SBA-15 with thiols, amines and carboxylic acids.10c
For further comparison of the activity, two control experi-
ments were carried out. In one case, trypsin was physically
adsorbed on AZP-SBA and then ALK-MSN was added in the
same ratio as was used for encapsulation of trypsin. This
material is referred as PHY-SBA-MSN (ESIw). In another
control, the PHY-SBA-MSN hybrid material described above
was subjected to the same workup protocol that was carried
out during the encapsulation reaction (washing with 10%
PEG solution in 50 mM, pH 8 tris buffer). This is referred
as PEG-SBA-MSN (ESIw). Both the materials were subjected
to activity study with BAPNA solution. The results (Fig. 2)
show that even though the activity of PHY-SBA-MSN is
about two-fold higher than that of the activity of the encap-
sulated enzyme (Trypsin-SBA-MSN), the activity of the PHY-
SBA-MSN decreases significantly with each cycle due to
leaching of the adsorbed enzyme in the solution.10c After
10 cycles activity of the adsorbed enzyme was decreased by
B75% where as encapsulated enzyme shows almost no loss in
activity. Two-fold decrease in activity of the trypsin upon
encapsulation in comparison to activity of adsorbed enzyme
observed may be due to increased mass transport limitations;
as BAPNA molecules have to diffuse through the pore channels
of MSNs and SBA-15 to reach to the encapsulated trypsin.
It is likely that the BAPNA molecules being positively charged
were strongly adsorbed inside pore channels of MSNs which
resulted in slow diffusion of BAPNA molecules onto the
immobilized trypsin inside the pores of SBA-15.3f On the other
hand, PEG-SBA-MSN showed 87% less activity as compared
to activity by PHY-SBA-MSN. UV-Vis studies on estimation
Notes and references
1 (a) A. Schmid, J. S. Dordick, B. Hauer, A. Kiener, M. Wubbolts
and B. Witholt, Nature, 2001, 409, 258; (b) R. A. Sheldon, Adv.
Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 1289; (c) M. Hartmann and D. Jung,
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 844.
2 (a) R. Reshmi, G. Sanjay and S. Sugunan, Catal. Commun., 2006,
7, 460; (b) A. Petri, P. Marconcini and P. Salvadori, J. Mol. Catal.
B: Enzym., 2005, 32, 219; (c) A. P. V. Goncalves, J. M. Lopes,
F. Lemos, F. Ramoa Ribeiro, D. M. F. Prazeres, J. M. S. Cabral
and M. R. Aires-Barros, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 1996, 1, 53.
3 (a) F. N. Serralha, J. M. Lopes, F. Lemos, D. M. F. Prazeres,
M. R. Aires-Barros, J. M. S. Cabral and F. Ramoa Ribeiro,
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 1998, 4, 303; (b) H. H. P. Yiu and
P. A. Wright, J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 3690; (c) S. Hudson,
J. Cooney and E. Magner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8582;
(d) M. Hartmann, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 4577; (e) J. Kim,
J. W. Grate and P. Wang, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2006, 61, 1017;
(f) H. H. P. Yiu, P. A. Wright and N. P. Botting, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater., 2001, 44–45, 763.
4 A. S. M. Chong and X. S. Zhao, Catal. Today, 2004, 93–95, 293.
5 (a) P. Wang, S. Dai, S. D. Waezsada, A. Y. Tsao and
B. H. Davison, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2001, 74, 249;
(b) A. Schlossbauer, D. Schaffert, J. Kecht, E. Wagner and
T. Bein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12558; (c) J. F. Dıaz and
´
K. J. Balkus, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 1996, 2, 115; (d) H. Ma,
J. He, D. G. Evans and X. Duan, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2004,
30, 209; (e) Y. Wang and F. Caruso, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1528;
(f) A. Yu, Y. Wang, E. Barlow and F. Caruso, Adv. Mater., 2005,
17, 1737; (g) A. Margot, E. Flaschel and A. Renken, Process
Biochem., 1998, 33, 125.
6 (a) C. A. Prieto, E. M. Guadix and A. Guadix, J. Food Eng., 2010,
97, 24; (b) A. Katiyar, S. Yadav, P. G. Smirniotis and N. G. Pinto,
J. Chromatogr., A, 2006, 1122, 13; (c) V. Hong, S. I. Presolski,
C. Ma and M. G. Finn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9879;
(d) E. M. Sletten and C. R. Bertozzi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011,
44, 666.
7 B. Malvi, B. R. Sarkar, D. Pati, R. Mathew, T. G. Ajithkumar and
S. Sen Gupta, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 1409.
8 C.-Y. Lai, B. G. Trewyn, D. M. Jeftinija, K. Jeftinija, S. Xu,
S. Jeftinija and V. S. Y. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 4451.
9 (a) R. Mortera, J. Vivero-Escoto, I. I. Slowing, E. Garrone,
B. Onida and V. S. Y. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2009, 3219;
(b) B. Malvi, C. Panda, B. B. Dhar and S. S. Gupta, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 5289.
10 (a) D. Goradia, J. Cooney, B. K. Hodnett and E. Magner, J. Mol.
Catal. B: Enzym., 2005, 32, 231; (b) N. Gartmann and
D. Bruhwiler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6354; (c) H. H. P.
¨
Yiu, P. A. Wright and N. P. Botting, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym.,
2001, 15, 81.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7853–7855 7855