LANTHANIDE CYCLIZATION OF PHOSPHATE DIESTERS
291
FIG. 4. Transition state of lanthanide-catalyzed cyclization of uridine 3Ј-p-nitrophenyl phosphate.
The background rate of cyclization of 1 is significant even at pH 5.5 (Table 1),
necessitating the blocking of the 2Ј-oxygen until one is ready to carry out reactions.
The observed background rate agrees within a factor of 4 to that expected from the
determined rate constant for hydroxide reaction of 840 MϪ1 sϪ1(26). The background
rate of cyclization of the p-nitrophenyl phosphate ester of propylene glycol is over
two orders of magnitude smaller at pH 6.85 (27,28). If this rate is corrected to the
expected rate at pH 5.5, the difference in reactivity between the two compounds is
over three orders of magnitude. This is presumably due to the freedom of rotation
in the glycol so that the nucleophile is not held in the correct position to undergo the
cyclization. In 1, the 2Ј-hydroxyl is held in the proper position for nucleophilic attack
by the closed ribose ring. However, the rate constant for breakdown of the metal ion-
substrate complex (Table 2) is only two orders of magnitude more favorable for 1
than for the glycol after correction for pH (27). The difference between the advantage
of 1 over the glycol in the uncatalyzed and catalyzed reactions can be explained by
the ability of the metal ion to organize the substrate for nucleophilic attack, which
is less important for 1. This organization would be brought about by simultaneous
coordination of the metal to the nucleophile and the phosphate group.
REFERENCES
1. Westheimer, F. H. (1981) Chem. Rev. 81, 313–326.
2. Bruice, T. C., and Benkovic, S. J. (1966) in Bioorganic Mechanisms, Vol. 2, pp. 1–103, Benjamin,
New York.
3. Benkovic, S. J., and Schray, K. J. (1973) in The Enzymes, 3rd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 201–238, Academic
Press; New York.
4. Butcher, W. W., and Westheimer, F. H. (1955) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 2420–2424.
5. Selwyn, M. J. (1968) Nature 219, 490–493.
6. Morrow, J. R., Buttrey, L. A., Shelton, V. M., and Berback, K. A. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc.
114, 1903–1905.
7. Chin, K. O. A., and Morrow, J. R. (1994) Inorg. Chem. 33, 5036–5041.
8. Amin, S., Voss, D. A. Jr., Horrocks, W. D. Jr., Lake, C. H., Churchill, M. R., and Morrow, J. R.
(1995) Inorg. Chem. 34, 3294–3300.
9. Amin, S., Voss, D. A. Jr., Horrocks, W. D. Jr., and Morrow, J. R. (1996) Inorg. Chem. 35, 7466–7467.
10. Chappell, L. L., Voss, D. A. Jr., Horrocks, W. D. Jr., and Morrow, J. R. (1998) Inorg. Chem.
37, 3989–3998.
11. Baker, B. F., Khalili, H., Wei, N., and Morrow, J. R. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 8749–8755.
12. Hurst, P., Takasaki, B. K., and Chin, J. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 9982–9983.
13. Hengge, A. C., and Cleland, W. W. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 5835–5841.
14. Bone, R., Frank, L., Springer, J. P., and Atack, J. R. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9468–9476.
15. Gettins, P., and Coleman, J. E. (1984) J. Biol Chem. 259, 4991–4997.