Table 1 Kinetic parameters for the 522C2 catalyzed hydrolysis of tyrosine benzoate and other esters
KM
(mmol dm23
kcat/KM
(dm3 s21 mol21
k
cat/KMk0
Substrate
k0/s21
kcat/s21
)
kcat/k0
)
(dm3 mol21
)
(S)-1a
(S)-1b
(S)-1b,c
3ab
5.06 3 1026
1.53 3 1026
1.53 3 1026
8.16 3 1026
1.04 3 1024
4.49 3 1025
1.94 3 1024
2.90 3 1026
5.70 3 1028
8.21 3 1028
0.063
0.017
0.020
500
370
410
12 400
11 100
13 100
126
45.9
48.8
44.9
35.4
8.5
—
0.39
1.2
2.5 3 107
3.0 3 107
3.2 3 107
5.5 3 106
3.4 3 105
1.9 3 105
—
1.4 3 106
2.1 3 107
1.4 3 107
3bb
3cb
3db
5b
6d
5.5 3 1024
7.5 3 1024
460
650
9 700
9 100
7d
1.2
a TRIS 10 mM, pH 8, dioxane 10%, 25 °C. b PBS, pH 7.5, 10% dioxane, 30 °C. c Fab fragment. d PBS, pH 7.5, 30% DMSO, 30 °C.
Kd,app (4900) indicate that selective recognition of the transition
state significantly contributes to the catalytic activity. Thus
522C2 behaves similarly to other ester hydrolyzing antibodies
for which oxyanion stabilization has been recognized as the
main source of catalytic activity.8
It is noteworthy that the substrate selectivity exhibited by
522C2 is reversed with respect to that displayed by a hydrolytic
enzyme such as a-chymotrypsin. This protease is known to
hydrolyze esters with a broad specificity. However, under
similar conditions, the acceleration in the hydrolysis of p-
nitrophenyl ester 3a is six times higher than the acceleration in
the hydrolysis of tyrosine ester 1. Another major difference
between a-chymotrypsin and 522C2 is representend by the pre-
steady state burst which is observed with the enzyme but not
with 522C2, in agreement with the mechanism proposed for the
antibody.
Finally, the activity of 522C2 was also tested on the
dipeptides 6 and 7 (Table 1). 522C2 retains most of its catalytic
activity on both the dipeptide benzoates even in the presence of
30% DMSO, which is necessary for solubility. Replacement in
7 of the N-Cbz protecting group with the somewhat isosteric
residue of phenylalanine does not lead to a loss of activity.
In conclusion, 522C2 is an efficient and selective catalyst for
the hydrolysis of (S)-tyrosine benzoate and retains its activity
when the substrate is part of a simple dipeptide. This
preliminary result is promising in view of a possible extension
of this approach to the selective deprotection of tyrosine
benzoate in more complex peptide structures, which would be a
valuable application and is currently being investigated.
We are grateful to CNR (Progetto Finalizzato Biotecnologie)
and to MURST (Programma PRIN) for financial support.
Antibody 522C2 is highly specific for the S-enantiomer of
tyrosine benzoate, mirroring the configuration of the hapten,
and no acceleration over background is observed in the
hydrolysis of the corresponding R-ester. While displaying such
a high enantiospecificity, antibody 522C2 is able to hydrolyze a
number of simplified esters 3 in which tyrosine is replaced by p-
nitrophenol. Solubility, and the high values of KM for these
substrates, restrict the accessible substrate concentrations to a
range in which [S] < < KM. Therefore, second order rate
constants, corresponding to kcat/KM ratios assuming Michaelis–
Menten behaviour, were obtained for this set of esters and the
ratio kcat/KM·k0 (catalytic proficiency) was chosen to compare
the efficiency of the antibody on these substrates (Table 1).9
Data in Table 1 show that one order of magnitude in the
catalytic proficiency is lost on going from N-Cbz-tyrosine
benzoate 1 to p-nitrophenyl benzoate 3a. This decrease in the
catalytic activity of the antibody is paralleled by its affinity for
the corresponding phosphonates. In fact, while the tyrosine
phosphonate 2, as we have seen, is a strong binder, the simple
phenyl phenylphosphonate 4 does not inhibit 522C2. This
Notes and references
1 D. Hilvert, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2000, 69, 751; G. M. Blackburn and A.
Garçon, in Biotechnology, ed. D. R. Kelly, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2nd
edn., vol. 8b, 2000, p. 403; J. D. Stevenson and N. R. Thomas, Nat. Prod.
Rep., 2000, 17, 535; J. L. Reymond, Top. Curr. Chem., 1999, 200, 59;
G. M. Blackburn, A. Datta, H. Denham and P. Wentworth Jr., Adv. Phys.
Org. Chem., 1998, 31, 249.
2 S. P. Vyas, P. Venugopalan, A. Sood and N. Mysore, Pharmazie, 1997,
52, 339; D. K. Clodfelter, A. H. Pekar, D. M. Rebhun, K. A. Destrampe,
H. A. Havel, S. R. Myers and M. L. Brader, Pharmacol. Res., 1998, 15,
254; M. Baudys, D. Letourneur, F. Liu, D. Mix, J. Jozefonvicz and S. W.
Kim, Bioconjugate Chem., 1998, 9, 176.
3 B. T. Miller, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1996, 218, 377; R. D.
Lundbald, Techniques in Protein Modification, CRC Press, Boca Raton,
1995; A. W. Yem, H. A. Zurcher-Neely, K. A. Richard, N. D. Staite, R. L.
Heinrikson and M. R. Deibel, J. Biol. Chem., 1989, 264, 17691; L.
Gardossi, D. Bianchi and A. Klibanov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113,
6328.
4 M. F. Hersman and L. F. Audrieth, J. Org. Chem., 1958, 23, 1889.
5 E. Harlow and D. Lane, Antibodies, a Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory, 1988, p. 139.
6 B. Friguet, A. F. Chaffotte, L. Djavadi-Ohaniance and M. E. Goldberg,
J. Immunol. Methods, 1985, 77, 305.
7 J. D. Stewart and S. J. Benkovic, Nature, 1995, 375, 388.
8 J. L. Buchbinder, R. C. Stephenson, T. S. Scanlan and R. J. Fletterick,
J. Mol. Biol., 1998, 282, 1033; J. B. Charbonnier, B. Gigant, B. Golinelli-
Pimpaneau and M. Knossow, Biochimie, 1997, 79, 653; G. MacBeath and
D. Hilvert, Chemistry & Biology, 1996, 3, 433.
9 A. R. Radzicka and R. A. Wolfenden, Science, 1995, 267, 90; C. L. Lo,
P. Wentworth, K. W. Jung, J. Yoon, J. A. Ashley and K. D. Janda, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 10 251.
indicates that in the substrate 1 and hapten 2 the region of the
molecule corresponding to the protected a-amino acid group
plays a significant role in recognition by the antibody.
Replacing the benzoyl group by aliphatic residues, as in the
hydrolysis of esters 3b and 3c, results in a further decrease of
catalytic proficiency by one order of magnitude (Table 1). The
catalytic activity is completely lost when branching is in-
troduced in the ester 3d. Surprisingly however, antibody 522C2
shows good efficiency in the hydrolysis of benzyl p-nitro-
benzoate 5.
716
Chem. Commun., 2001, 715–716