Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.2 (2005)
195
H
.
O
edged. S. J. and A. K. A. thank CSIR, Govt. of India for research
fellowships.
H
O
.
O
Mn
X
X
Mn
O
References and Notes
H
O
y
1
2
Previously named as Bengal Engineering College (Deemed
University).
CHO
O
Mn
X
Mn(OH)X
+
A
a) M. Sommelet, C. R. Acad. Sci., 157, 852 (1913). b) M.
Sommelet, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 13, 1085 (1913).
a) R. C. Larock, in ‘‘Comprehenshive Organic Transforma-
tions,’’ VCH Publishers, Inc., New York (1989), p 599. b)
S. N. Kileny, in ‘‘Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,’’ ed.
by B. M. Trost and S. V. Ley, Pergamon Press, Oxford
(1991), Vol. 7, pp 653–670. c) M. B. Smith and J. March,
‘‘March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry,’’ 5th ed., Wiley-
Interscience Publication, New York (2001), pp 1535–1536.
a) H. B. Hass and M. L. Bender, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 1767
(1949). b) B. H. Clanderman, J. Org. Chem., 31, 2618
(1966).
F. Krohnke, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2, 380 (1963).
a) N. Kornblum, J. W. Powers, G. J. Anderson, W. L. Jones,
H. O. Larson, O. Levand, and W. M. Weaver, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 79, 6562 (1957). b) N. Kornblum, W. J. Jones, and
G. J. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81, 4113 (1959).
L. Syper and J. Mlochowski, Synthesis, 1984, 747.
a) D. Landini and F. Rolla, Chem. Ind. (London), 1979, 213.
b) P. Cardilo, M. Orena, and F. Sandri, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1976, 190.
Scheme 2. A plausible reaction mechanism for the MnO2
oxidation of benzyl halides.
pyridine, 2-pivaloyl-6-bromomethylpyridine, and 2-N-phthali-
mido-6-bromomethylpyridine were unsuccessful. Interestingly,
in the case of 1,4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene (Entry 7) only one
bromomethyl group got oxidized while the other remained unaf-
fected under the same conditions.
Although, at this point, no rigorous mechanistic studies
have been done, a working hypothesis may be suggested on
the basis of the observation of the products (Scheme 2). The la-
bile benzyl halide is probably displaced thermally to form a ben-
zyl radical by activated interaction with MnO2 under refluxing
conditions, which immediately couples with the oxygen radical
3
4
5
.
of OMn(X)(O) to form a possible intermediate (A). This under-
goes subsequent loss of acidic benzylic hydrogen followed by
reductive cleavage of oxygen–manganese bond in (A) with loss
of oxomanganese halide resulting in the formation of aromatic
aldehydes and probably MnO as a salt Mn(OH)X as the oxide
in reduced MnII state is basic.17
6
7
The reason for the formation of 2-bromomethyl-3-methyl-
quinoxaline (Table 1, Entry 13), as an exception to the normal
benzylic oxidation to aldehyde, may possibly be that the benzyl
radical gets quenched by hydrogen capture from solvent chloro-
form giving the observed product. We are currently extending
this methodology onto other heterocyclic as well as other aro-
matic systems having poly(bromomethyl) substituents.
Representative procedure for the oxidation of 4-nitrobenzyl
bromide: A mixture of 4-nitrobenzyl bromide (216 mg, 1 mmol)
and activated manganese dioxide (480 mg, 5 mmol, Aldrich
21,764-6) in chloroform (10 mL) was refluxed for 4 h at 60 ꢁC.
The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using petro-
leum ether–dichloromethane (3:1) as eluent. The reaction mix-
ture was filtered and washed with chloroform. The combined fil-
trates after evaporation and silica gel (60–120 mesh) purification
afforded 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (112 mg, 74%) along with recov-
ery of unreacted (15%) starting material.18
In conclusion, we have developed a very simple, efficient,
mild, and inexpensive procedure for the oxidation of benzyl hal-
ides to the aromatic aldehydes. We have found that this proce-
dure (MnO2 in refluxing chloroform) is even more controlled
at least in the case of oxidation of simple benzylbromide itself
than our previous one (aerial oxygen, Co(I)(PPh3)3Cl),14 though
it required lower temperature (Co(I), aerial oxygen is thus more
reactive). In the latter case, benzoic acid was obtained appreci-
ably from benzyl bromide itself (benzaldehyde was further oxi-
dized) unlike the present case where the yield of benzaldehyde is
excellent.
8
9
a) S. Mukaiyama, J. Inanaga, and M. Yamaguchi, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 54, 2221 (1981). b) S. Suzuki, T. Onishi,
Y. Fujita, H. Misawa, and J. Otera, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.,
59, 3287 (1986). c) S. Chandrasekhar and M. Sridhar,
Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 5423 (2000).
A. Itoh, T. Kodana, S. Inagaki, and Y. Masaki, Org. Lett., 2,
2455 (2000).
10 S. Das, A. K. Panigrahi, and G. C. Maikap, Tetrahedron
Lett., 44, 1375 (2003).
11 R. Badri and M. Soleymani, Synth. Commun., 33, 1325
(2003).
12 C. Li, P. Zheng, J. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Cui, Q. Shao, X. Ji, J.
Zhang, P. Zhao, and Y. Xu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
42, 5063 (2003).
13 a) M. M. Hashemi, A. Rahimi, and Y. Ahmadibeni, Acta
Chim. Slov., 51, 333 (2004). b) B. Barbry and P. Champagne,
Tetrahedron Lett., 37, 7725 (1996).
14 S. P. Goswami and A. K. Mahapatra, Tetrahedron Lett., 39,
1981 (1998).
15 A. J. Fatiadi, Synthesis, 1976, 65; A. J. Fatiadi, Synthesis,
1976, 133.
16 a) S. P. Goswami, K. Ghosh, R. Mukherjee, A. K. Adak,
and A. K. Mahapatra, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 38, 173
(2001). b) S. P. Goswami, S. Dey, S. Jana, and A. K. Adak,
Chem. Lett., 33, 691 (2004).
17 J. D. Lee, in ‘‘Concise Inorganic Chemistry,’’ 5th ed.,
Chapman and Hall, London (1996) pp 736–742.
18 All products are characterized by FT-IR, 1H NMR and also
comparison of the melting points with authentic samples
when available.
Financial assistance from the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India is gratefully acknowl-
Published on the web (Advance View) January 15, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.194