solvent. Then, benzaldehyde and trimethylsilyl cyanide
TMSCN) were added in one portion at 0 °C in the presence
(
Table 2. Enantioselective Synthesis of Cyanohydrins Catalyzed
by Complexes 3
of 4 Å molecular sieves (MS). Preliminary studies with
titanium(IV) salts as Lewis acids were not completely
satisfactory as it was found that chemical yields did not
parallel those of enantioselection (Table 1, entries 1-3).
In contrast, aluminum catalysts offered better prospects.
Thus, when dimethylaluminum chloride was used as the
Lewis acid, the reaction took place quantitatively in 3 h in
T
t
yield configuration,
b
1
6,17
entry
aldehyde
PhCHO
3
(°C) (h)
4
(%)a
er
8
8:12 er, though only when both MS
and triphenylphos-
1
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(S) -20
6
6
6
4a
4a
4a
4a
4a
4d
4e
4e
4f
99
99
99
99
99
99
70
45
99
99
99
99
99
99
(R) >99/1
(S) >99/1
(R) >99/1
(R) >99/1
(S) 98/2
(R) >99/1
(R) 85/15
(R) 89/11
(R) 88/12
(R) 96/4
phane oxide were employed as additives (Table 1, cf.
PhCHO
PhCHO
4-(MeO)C
(R) -20
entries 4-6). Lowering the temperature to -20 °C (Table
(S)c -20
1
, entry 7) led to a significant leap forward in enantioselec-
tivity (er higher than 99:1) while keeping the reactivity high
quantitative chemical yield in 6 h). Using diethyl instead
of dimethylaluminum chloride gave somewhat poorer results
Table 1, entry 9). The presence of both 4 Å MS (200 mg/
6
H
4
CHO (S) -20 20
2-ClC
4-ClC
6
H
H
4
CHO
CHO
(R) -20
8
6
4
(S) -20 21
(
4-(PhO)C
4-(PhO)C
6
H
H
4
CHO (S) -20 48
6
4
CHO (S) -40 48
2-FurylCHO
2-FurylCHO
PhCHdCHCHO
PhCHdCHCHO
(S) -20
(S) -40 12
(S) -20
(R) -40 12
5
(
1
0
4g
4h
4h
16
mmol of aldehydes, ca. 1 equiv) and triphenylphosphane
oxide was crucial for achieving high enantioselectivities in
all cases studied (Table 1, entries 4-6). On the other hand,
in coping with solvent effects, we found that operating with
toluene (the reaction mixture is somewhat heterogeneous
under these conditions) yielded higher ers than when
dichloromethane (the reaction mixture is homogeneous) was
employed as the solvent (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). In
contrast, operating without 4 Å MS but in the presence of
water (the same amount determined to be present in the
molecular sieves) gave a very low yield and a poor
enantiomeric ratio of the resulting cyanohydrin 4. So, we
can reckon that 4 Å MS are an excellent carrier of a limited
11
6
(R) 91/9
(S) >99/1
(S) 94/6
1
1
2
3
PhCH
2
CH
2
CHO
CHO
(R) -40 4.5 4i
(R) -40 3.5 4j
14
CH (CH
3
2
)
5
(S) 83/17
a
Isolated yields of the cyanohydrin after acidic hydrolysis. b Enantiomeric
ratios were determined by chiral HPLC analysis (Chiralcel OD-H and
Chiralpak AD and AS). c Reaction was performed with recovered ligand
by extractive workup and recrystallization.
the preparation of cyanohydrins (S)-4. In all studied cases,
the reaction conversions and chemical yields were both very
high, the title alcohol 4 being obtained after acidic treatment.
From the experimental viewpoint two noticeable aspects need
to be remarked, especially when compared with the proce-
19
amount of water, as recently demonstrated in a related case.
7
dure reported by Shibasaki et al. First, the procedure is
These optimized reaction conditions were used for the
cyanation of a number of other aldehydes (Table 2). Aromatic
aldehydes gave excellent results (Table 2, entries 1-10) with
the exception of furfural and p-phenoxybenzaldehyde. In
these cases, better ers were reached when operating at -40
extremely simple as reagents can be added at once (no slow
pump addition is needed); reaction times are short; and the
temperature of operation is quite high. In addition, the
process can be scaled-up without appreciable differences in
chemical and stereochemical yields. Thus, when the cyana-
tion of benzaldehyde was carried out in a 2.5 mmol scale, a
°C (Table 2, entries 9 and 10). A prototypic R,â-unsaturated
aldehyde such as cinnamaldehyde also yielded the cyano-
hydrin in excellent yield and er (Table 2, entries 11 and 12).
On the other hand, enatioselectivities of aliphatic aldehydes
were poorer than those of aromatic aldehydes at -20 °C
and were improved by working at -40 °C (Table 2, entries
9
8% isolated yield of cyanohydrin was obtained, after 12 h
at -20 °C, in a 98.5:1.5 er. Moreover, enantiomerically pure
S)-BINOLAM was almost quantitatively (>95% yield)
(
recovered after a simple acid-base workup and purification
and reused without a loss of efficiency (Table 2, entry 3).
The cyanation of the aldehyde containing a thiazole moiety
13 and 14). Alternatively, (R)-BINOLAM can be used for
7
b,20
deserved special attention,
as this asymmetric reaction
(15) Enantiopure cyanohydrins are important building blocks for the
constitutes one of the key steps in the synthesis of epothilone
synthesis of 1,2-bifunctional compounds such as R-hydroxycarbonyl
compounds, â-amino alcohols, and R-amino acids and also for the generation
of new materials: (a) Liang, S.; Bu, X. R. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2702-
2
1
A. Previously, compound (S)-4k was prepared at -40 °C
in 48 h by adding 1.5 equiv of TMSCN very slowly (syringe
2
708. (b) Gr o¨ ger, H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 547-558. (c) Gregory,
7
b,21
pump).
In our case, slow addition of 2 equiv of TMSCN
R. J. H. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 3649-3682. (d) Effenberger, F. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1555-1564. (e) Kruse, C. G. In Chirality
in Industry; Collins, A. N., Schedrake, G. N., Crosby, J., Eds.; Wiley:
Chichester, UK, 1992; Chapter 14. (f) North, M. Synlett 1993, 807-820.
was not productive (Table 3, entry 3) because residual
unreacted 4k was observed in the crude reaction mixture.
Fortunately, when the reaction was carried out at -20 °C
and excess TMSCN (9 equiv) added in one portion,
(
16) Thermogravimetric analysis of “dry” MS (dried at 120 °C for 4 h)
revealed a 7.5% water content.
17) The role of 4 Å MS as an H2O donor has been demonstrated for
(
the case of binaphthol-derived titanium complexes: Terada, M.; Matsumoto,
Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Mikami, K. Chem. Commun. 1997, 281-282.
(20) (a) Sawada, D.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
209-213. (b) Sawada, D.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 43, 10521-10532.
(21) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Hepworth, D.; King, N. P.; Finlay, M. R. V.;
Scarpelli, R.; Pereira, M. M. A.; Bollbuck, B.; Bigot, A.; Werschkun, B.;
Winssinger, N. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2783-2800. (b) Bode, J. W.; Carreira,
E. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6410-6424.
(18) The influence of Ph3PO on prevention of oligomerization of the
catalyst and activation of trimethylsilyl cyanide has been pointed out: Vogl,
E. M.; Gr o¨ ger, H.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1570-
1
577.
(19) Shimizu, M.; Ogawa, T.; Nishi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
5
463-5466.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 15, 2002
2591