2272 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 104, No. 10, 2000
Almusaiteer and Chuang
NO conversion and CO2 formation rates reached the steady state,
whereas the intensities of Rh0-CO and Rh+-CO continued to
change with time. Accordingly, the reaction step, which
consumed the IR-observable adsorbates, is not the rate-
determining step.
surface and slows the NO-CO reaction. Adsorbed oxygen from
the oxygen molecule depletes adsorbed CO and oxidizes Rh0
to Rh+.
Although the surface state of Rh in the simulated gas
environment resembles that of Rh in the NO/CO ) 1/9 (i.e.,
reducing) environment, the NO reduction activity under the
simulated gas environment is significantly lower than under the
NO/CO ) 1/9 environment. Low NO conversion under simu-
lated gas reaction conditions can be attributed to competition
of reductants for the same Rh0 sites. The significant difference
in the NO reduction rate between the NO-CO reaction and
simulated gas reaction points to (i) the importance of studying
the NO-CO reaction under practical conditions and (ii) the need
to keep Rh in the reduced state and to ensure the proper balance
of competitive adsorption for NO, CO, and C3H8.
Effects of Simulated Gas on the Oxidation State and
Reaction Rate. The species in the simulated gas can be grouped
into reductant (i.e., CO, H2, C3H8) and oxidant (i.e., NO, O2).
The Rh surface state is expected to be influenced by the relative
rate of the reduction and oxidation with reductant/oxidant. It is
interesting to note that the surface state of Rh in the simulated
gas environment (Figure 6) resembles that of Rh in the NO/
CO ) 1/9 (Figure 4) environment as evidenced by similarity
in the Rh0-CO and Rh+(CO)2 intensities. The decrease in the
Rh+(CO)2 intensity accompanied with the increase in NO
conversion and CO2 formation in Figures 1-5 was also observed
for the simulated gas reaction in Figure 6. However, the catalyst
in the simulated gas environment exhibits a significantly lower
activity for the NO-CO reaction than that in the NO/CO )
1/9 environment. Low NO conversion could be due to competi-
tion of reductants for the same Rh0 sites since all the reactions
between the oxidant and reductant have the same light-off
temperature. Results of this study will serve as an excellent basis
to estimate the potential loss in catalyst activity as the conditions
move from the ideal NO-CO setting to the simulated gas
reaction environment.
Acknowledgment. The research described in this paper has
been funded wholly by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency under assistance agreement R823529-01-0 to the
University of Akron.
References and Notes
(1) Yang, A. C.; Garland, C. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1957, 61, 1504.
(2) Wang, T.; Schmidt, L. D. J. Catal. 1980, 66, 301.
(3) Cavanagh, R. R.; Yates, J. T., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 74, 4150.
(4) Solymosi, F.; Pasztor, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4789.
(5) Chakraborti, S.; Datye, A. K.; Long, N. J. J. Catal. 1987, 108,
444.
Reaction of Al-NCO. The decrease in the Al-NCO
intensity during the O2 pulse and simulated gas reaction could
be due to the reaction of adsorbed oxygen with Al-NCO to
produce N2 and CO2 as follows:
(6) Shen, J. Y.; Sayari, A.; Kaliaguine, S. Appl. Spectrosc. 1992, 46,
127.
(7) Goodman, D. W. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 523.
(8) Almusaiteer, A. K.; Chuang, S. S. C. J. Catal. 1999, 184, 189.
(9) Gates, B. C. Catalytic Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1992; p 77.
(10) Schwartz, J. M.; Schmidt, L. D. J. Catal. 1994, 148, 22.
(11) Solymosi, F.; Rasko, J. J. Catal. 1980, 63, 217.
(12) Hecker, W. C.; Bell, A. T. J. Catal. 1983, 84, 200.
(13) Oh, S. H., and Carpenter, J. E., J. Catal. 1986, 101, 114.
(14) Wong, C.; McCabe, R. W. J. Catal. 1987, 107, 535.
(15) Solymosi, F.; Bansagi, T.; Novak, E. J. Catal. 1988, 112, 183.
(16) Basu, P.; Panayotov, D.; Yates, J. T., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 2074.
2Al-NCO + 2Oad f N2 + 2CO2
(3)
Reaction 3 requires either (i) migration of adsorbed oxygen from
the Rh site to the Al2O3 site for reaction with Al-NCO or (ii)
migration of adsorbed Al-NCO from Al2O3 to Rh to react with
adsorbed oxygen on Rh sites. The latter appears to be more
likely than the former because of facile migration of Al-NCO.
(17) Dictor, R. J. Catal. 1988, 109, 89.
Conclusions
(18) Cho, B. K.; Shanks, B. H.; Bailey, J. E. J. Catal. 1989, 109, 89.
(19) Buchanan, D. A.; Hemandez, M. E.; Solymosi, F.; Whit, J. M. J.
Catal. 1990, 125, 456.
(20) Oh, S. H.; Eickel, C. C. J. Catal. 1991, 128, 526.
(21) Paul, D. K.; Yates, J. T., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1699.
(22) Logan, A. D.; Sharoudi, K.; Datye, A. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 5568.
(23) Anderson, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1991, 87, 3907.
(24) Krause, K. R.; Schmidt, L. D. J. Catal. 1993, 140, 424.
(25) Srinivas, G.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Debnath, S. J. Catal. 1994, 148,
748.
(26) Berko, A.; Menesi, G.; Solymosi, F. J. Phys. Chem. B 1996, 100,
17732.
In situ IR coupled with TPR studies allow observation of
various forms of NO and CO adsorbates as a function of
temperature and reactant partial pressures. Below light-off, Rh+-
(CO)2, Rh-NO+, Rh0-CO, and Rh0-NO- are the major
adsorbates; above light-off, Rh+-CO, Rh0-CO, and Al-NCO
are the major adsorbates. Al-NCO formation is enhanced and
Rh-NO+ is suppressed in the reducing (i.e., low NO/CO ratio)
environment and vice versa in the oxidizing environment (i.e.,
high NO/CO ratio or in the presence of O2).
Variation in the intensities of NO and CO adsorbates with
temperature and reactant partial pressures indicates the depen-
dence of the redox reaction cycle on temperature and reactant
partial pressures. The oxidation rate increases faster with
temperature than the reduction rate below light-off and vice
versa above light-off. The extent and rate of oxidation increase
with the partial pressure of NO and CO. The shift in the TPR
curves of NO conversion, CO2 formation, and Rh+(CO)2 to low
temperatures at NO/CO ) 1/9 suggests that excess CO
accelerates the rate of the reduction step. In contrast, a high
NO/CO ratio shifts the TPR curves of NO conversion and CO2
formation to high temperatures and slows the reduction step.
The presence of oxygen in the reactant stream oxidizes the Rh
(27) Novak, E.; Sprinceana, D.; Solymosi, F. Appl. Catal. A 1997, 149,
89.
(28) Conners, L.; Hollis, T.; Johnson, D. A.; Blyholder, G. J. Phys.
Chem. B 1998, 102, 10112.
(29) Chuang, S. S. C.; Brundage, M. A.; Balakos, M. W.; Srinivas, G.
Appl. Spectrosc. 1995, 49, 1151.
(30) Taylor, K. C. Catal. ReV.-Sci. Eng. 1993, 35, 457.
(31) Li, Y. E.; Gonzalez, R. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 1589.
(32) Chuang, S. S. C.; Pien, S. I. J. Catal. 1992, 135, 618.
(33) Simon Ng, K. Y.; Belton, D. N.; Schmieg, S. J.; Fisher, G. B. J.
Catal. 1994, 146, 394.
(34) Krishnamurthy, R.; Chuang, S. S. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99,
16727.
(35) Krishnamurthy, R.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Balakos, M. W. J. Catal.
1995, 157, 512.