LETTER
Polyaniline Salt as Catalyst for Protection and Deprotection
1795
Table 2 Deprotection of Protected Carbonyl Compounds with Wa-
ter Using Polyaniline-Sulfate Salt (20% w.r.t. Protected Carbonyl
Compounds) (continued)
takes 120 minutes, (entry 9) and benzophenone takes 180
minutes, (entry 11) and p-nitro benzaldehyde takes 90
minutes, presumably due to the electron-withdrawing
group in this latter case (entry 7).
NH
O
O
R1
O
(H2SO4) x
In summary, we have demonstrated that polyaniline-
sulfate salt acts as a highly efficient polymer supported
acid catalyst in protection and deprotection of carbonyl
compounds with 1,2-ethanediol. Furthermore, a very use-
ful chemoselectivity for aliphatic and aromatic carbonyl
compounds has also been demonstrated. This work leads
to a simple, convenient, mild and efficient protection and
deprotection of carbonyl compounds in organic synthesis.
n
R2
R1
C
R2
C
(R1 , R2 = Alkyl,
(R1 , R2 = Alkyl,
Water
Aryl or Hydrogen)
Aryl or Hydrogen)
Entry Substrate
12
Time (min) Isolated yield (%)
45
95
O
O
O
13
45
90
Reference
O
(1) (a) Greene, T. W. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis;
Wiley: New York, 1981. (b) Loewenthal, H. J. E. In
Protective Groups in Organic Chemistry; McOmie, J. F. W.,
Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1973, 323–402.
14
15
30
45
96
90
O
O
(2) Kunz, H.; Waldmann, H. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,
Vol. 6; Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: New
York, 1991, 677–681.
(3) Freeman, I.; Karchetski, E. M. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1977, 22,
335.
(4) (a) Scriabine, I. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1961, 1194.
(b) Michie, J. K.; Miller, J. A. Synthesis 1981, 824.
(5) Thomas, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1673;
Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 1735.
(6) Karimi, B.; Seradj, H.; Ebrahimian, R. G. Synlett 2000, 623.
(7) (a) Luche, J.-L.; Gemal, A. L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1978, 976. (b) Gemal, A. L.; Luche, J.-L. J. Org.
Chem. 1979, 44, 4187.
(8) (a) Ott, J.; Ramos Tombo, G. M.; Schmid, B.; Venanzi, L.
M.; Wang, G.; Ward, T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
6151. (b) Gorla, F.; Venanzi, L. M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990,
73, 690.
(9) (a) Kumar, P.; Hedge, V. R.; Kumar, T. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 601. (b) Pereira, C.; Gigante, B.; Marcelocurto, M. J.;
Carreyra, H.; Perot, G.; Guisnat, M. Synthesis 1995, 1077.
(10) Rajn, S. V. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1996, 68.
(11) Joshi, M. V.; Narasimbam, C. S. J. Catal. 1993, 141, 308.
(12) Ballini, R.; Bordoni, M.; Bosica, G.; Maggi, R.; Sartori, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7587.
We observed that the protection of aldehydes takes place
faster in the presence of polyaniline-sulfate salt when
compared to the ketones (Table 1). The difference in reac-
tivity of the polyaniline-sulfate salt towards aldehydes
and ketones gave us the impetus to study chemoselective
reactions. We carried out an initial experiment with an
equimolar (1.0 equiv) mixture of p-methylbenzaldehyde
(1) and acetophenone (2) with 1.5 equivalent of 1,2-
ethanediol and polyaniline-sulfate salt (20 wt% with re-
spect to p-methylbenzaldehyde) in dry toluene. The ratio
of the products was determined by 1H NMR analysis. The
reaction resulted in complete conversion of p-methylben-
zaldehyde (3) and no conversion of acetophenone (2).
One can infer that the reaction with the aromatic aldehyde
takes place faster than with the aromatic ketone in the
presence of polyaniline-sulfate salt (Scheme 1). Likewise
we were able to achieve selective protection of an alicy-
clic ketone (4) in the presence of an aromatic ketone (2)
by this method (Scheme 2). Furthermore we studied
chemoselective protection of an aliphatic aldehyde (6) in
the presence of an aromatic aldehyde (7), which also ex-
hibited more selectivity towards the heptaldehyde (100%
conversion) (8) than p-chlorobenzaldehyde (10%) (9)
(Scheme 3). Polyaniline-sulfate salt thus demonstrates
pronounced selectivity between these functionalities.
(13) Jin, T. S.; Ma, Y. R.; Zhang, Z. H.; Li, T. S. Synth. Commun.
1997, 3379.
(14) (a) Preparation of Polyaniline-Sulfate Salt: In a typical
experiment, benzoyl peroxide (24.2 g, 0.1 M) was dissolved
in 300 mL acetone. Then 200 mL aqueous solution
containing 10 g of sodium lauryl sulfate (0.034 M) was
added into the above solution slowly. To this solution, 465
mL aqueous solution containing 27 mL of (1.0 N) sulfuric
acid and 9.3 g aniline (0.1 M) was added dropwise over 15–
20 min and the mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 8 h. The
precipitated polyaniline salt was filtered, washed with
distilled H2O, followed by MeOH and acetone. The sample
was dried at 100 °C to a constant weight. (b) Physical Data
of Polyaniline-Sulfate Salt: Yield: 82.1 % with respect to
the amount of aniline used. Conductivity (0.04 S/cm),
Sulfuric acid group present in polyaniline salt (30 %), Pellet
density (1.15 g/cm3), Particle size (0.3–75 mm), Elemental
analysis: C, 52.5%; H, 3.3%; N, 10.7%; S, 7.4 %.
(15) General Experimental Procedures: (a) For protection: In
a 50 mL round-bottom flask was placed p-
The cyclic acetals and ketals were deprotected to their
corresponding carbonyls in excellent yields (90–96%) us-
ing polyaniline-sulfate salt in aqueous medium15b and the
results are shown in Table 2 (entries 1–15). Cyclic acetals
of aromatic aldehydes (entries1–6), conjugated aldehydes
(entry 8), aromatic ketones (entry 10), alicyclic ketones
(entries12, 13), acyclic aliphatic aldehydes (entry 14) and
b-keto esters (entry 15) are effectively deprotected in 30–
45 minutes. However, the cyclic acetal of naphthaldehyde
methylbenzaldehyde (1 g, 8 mmol), 1,2-ethanediol (0.75 g,
12 mmol), 200 mg activated polyaniline-sulfate salt (20 wt%
Synlett 2003, No. 12, 1793–1796 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York