Grabow et al.: Microwave spectrum of N O5
7261
2
The small magnitude of the barrier in N O makes it
the discrepancy with the solution measurement. The sample
2
5
essential to understand the large-amplitude potential and its
effect on the rotational and vibrational states of the molecule
may have been contaminated with HNO , the product of the
3
42
facile hydrolysis of N O . Since ͑HNO ͒ϭ2.17Ϯ0.02 D,
2
5
3
to accurately model the thermodynamic properties of N O5
such contamination would lead to a high measured value.
Alternatively, N O may adopt a different conformation in
2
in atmospheric chemistry applications. For molecules where
the internal rotor is a symmetric top, precise internal-rotation
barriers have been determined without direct measurement of
the tunneling splitting. However, for such molecules there is
no dependence of the overall rotational constants on the in-
ternal rotation angles, making it easier to model the Coriolis
contributions to the rotational constants from which the bar-
2
5
solution than in the gas phase. Only a small differential sol-
vation energy ͑Շ2 kJ/mol͒ is required to favor structure 2
over 1. Since conformation 2 is predicted to have a larger
dipole moment than structure 1 ͑Table III͒, solvation effects
may explain the high solution value for .
rier is inferred. In the case of N O , the rotational constants
2
5
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
vary greatly with internal rotation angles due to the large
masses of the oxygen nuclei. Because of the significant de-
pendence of the rotational constants on the internal-rotation
The authors would like to thank the Upper-Atmosphere
Research Program of NASA and NATO ͑Grant No.
CRG931359͒ for partial support of this work. J.-U.G. ac-
knowledges postdoctoral fellowship support from the Deut-
sche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
angles, more general internal-axis models ͑IAM͒ such as ap-
plied by Coudert and Hougen40 to ͑H O͒ would need to
2
2
include the internal-rotation dependence of the rotational
constants explicitly.
1
Additional information on the structure and tunneling
pathways in N O can be obtained by isotopic substitution.
G. C. Toon, C. B. Farmer, and R. H. Norton, Nature ͑London͒ 319, 570
͑
1986͒.
2
5
2
3
4
17
18
C. Camy-Peyret, J.-M. Flaud, L. Lechuga-Fossat, G. Laverdet, and G. Le
Bras, Chem. Phys. Lett. 139, 345 ͑1987͒.
C. A. Cantrell, J. A. Davidson, A. H. McDaniel, R. E. Shetter, and J. G.
Calvert, Chem. Phys. Lett. 148, 358 ͑1988͒.
F. C. De Lucia, B. P. Winnewisser, M. Winnewisser, and G. Pawelke, J.
Mol. Spectrosc. 136, 151 ͑1989͒.
J.-M. Colmont, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 155, 11 ͑1992͒.
D. Newnham, J. Ballard, and M. Page, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans-
fer 50, 571 ͑1993͒.
B. W. McClelland, L. Hedberg, K. Hedberg, and K. Hagen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 105, 3789 ͑1983͒.
J. E. Carpenter and G. M. Maggiora, Chem. Phys. Lett. 87, 349 ͑1982͒.
A. Stirling, I. P a´ pai, J. Mink, and D. R. Salahub, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2910
For instance, mono O or O substitution on one of the NO2
groups removes the antigeared nonplanar tunneling pathway.
The geared pathway is also affected since now all four
minima are no longer isoenergetic. Mono 15N substitution
does not affect the qualitative features of any of the tunnel-
ing motions shown in Fig. 8. We note that in most cases
isotopic substitution will significantly change the simplicity
of the spectrum arising from the Boson statistics of the four
5
6
7
equivalent spin-zero oxygens of the NO groups.
8
9
2
The structure inferred from the electron-diffraction
7
͑
1994͒.
experiment is somewhat more planar than that inferred from
1
1
0
1
G. L. Lewis and C. P. Smyth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 61, 3067 ͑1939͒.
J. K. G. Watson, in Vibrational Spectra and Structure, edited by J. R.
Durig, ͑Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978͒, Vol. 6, pp. 1–89.
the present work. The diffraction experiment led to a value
of ␣Ϸ30°, whereas the present experiments indicate ␣Ϸ41°
and the ab initio calculations yield ␣ϭ37°. The spread
among these values reflects the flatness of the torsional po-
tential, as described above. For bond lengths and angles, the
MP2 and QCISD values generally agree better with experi-
ment than do the density-functional values from the present
work and from Ref. 9. Density-functional theory appears to
have some trouble describing the bonding at the central oxy-
gen atom; the bond length R and bond angle ␥ are too large
compared with experiment.
1
1
2
3
G. V. Caesar and M. Goldfrank, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68, 372 ͑1946͒.
P. W. Schenk, in Handbook of Preparative Inorganic Chemistry, edited by
G. Brauer ͑Academic, New York, 1963͒, Vol. 1, pp. 489–491.
T. J. Balle and W. H. Flygare, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 33 ͑1981͒.
F. J. Lovas and R. D. Suenram, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2010 ͑1987͒; R. D.
Suenram, F. J. Lovas, G. T. Fraser, J. Z. Gillies, C. W. Gillies, and M.
Onda, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 137, 127 ͑1989͒; F. J. Lovas, N. Zobov, G. T.
Fraser, and R. D. Suenram, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 171, 189 ͑1995͒.
J.-U. Grabow and W. Stahl, Z. Naturforsch. Teil A 45, 1043 ͑1990͒.
J. Z. Gillies, C. W. Gillies, F. J. Lovas, K. Matsumura, R. D. Suenram, E.
Kraka, and D. Cremer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 6408 ͑1991͒.
1
4
15
16
17
1
8
U. Andresen, H. Dreizler, J.-U. Grabow, and W. Stahl, Rev. Sci. Instrum.
The vibrational frequencies of Table V compare reason-
ably well with those from density-functional calculations and
61, 3694 ͑1990͒.
19
J. C. Slater, The Self-Consistent Field for Molecules and Solids, Vol. 4:
Quantum Theory of Molecules and Solids ͑McGraw-Hill, New York,
1974͒.
S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 ͑1980͒.
A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 ͑1988͒.
C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 ͑1988͒.
P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski, and M. J. Frisch, J. Phys.
Chem. 98, 11623 ͑1994͒.
9
,41
from experiment.
However, the density-functional results
agree better with experiment and therefore appear more reli-
able. All the theoretical vibrational frequencies indicate that
2
2
0
1
41
the experimental assumption of multiple degeneracies is
incorrect. Failure to resolve peaks is probably due to inten-
sity differences instead of accidental degeneracies.
22
2
3
2
2
4
5
A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 ͑1993͒.
L. Albinus, J. Spieckermann, and D. H. Sutter, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 133, 128
The largest discrepancy between theory and experiment
is for the dipole moment. The computed QCISD value is
͑
1989͒.
26
ϭ0.24 D, and values from 0.14 to 0.31 D were obtained in
M. H. Palmer, J. Mol. Struct. 239, 173 ͑1990͒.
9
27
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson,
M. W. Wong, J. B. Foresman, M. A. Robb, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Re-
plogle, R. Gomperts, J. L. Andres, K. Raghavachari, J. S. Binkley, C.
Gonzalez, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. J. P. Stewart,
and J. A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 92/DFT, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1993.
a density-functional study. Consistent with theory, the inten-
sities in the present experiment suggest ϳ0.5 D. A value of
1
.39 D, however, was inferred from measurements in CCl
4
1
0
solution. There are two simple alternative explanations for
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 105, No. 17, 1 November 1996
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 193.0.65.67
On: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:30:42