P. Lehr et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1235–1238
1237
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
S
O
S
NH2
N
Cl
b)
a)
O O
+
O
O
R
R
S
N
H
R
HO
4a-e,g-i
O
O
Br
O
N
Cl
S
a, b)
O
Cl
Br
O O
S
S
Cl
N
H
O
Cl
S
Cl
4f
Scheme 2. Synthesis of acylsulfonamides 4a–i. Reaction conditions: (a) NH4OH/ethyl acetate, rt, 16 h, then Dowex 50WX4; (b) PPA/DIEA, cat.
DMAP, DMF, rt, 16 h, 85–96% overall yield.
and 2 mM in the case of measurement of steady-state
kinetics, and were fixed at 0.75 mM in the case of IC50
determinations.
Based on the SAR finding that the potency of sulfonyl-
urea-based STS inhibitors 1 was strongly dependent on
the aryl substitution pattern, we synthesized and tested a
collection of derivatives of 4a with different aryl substit-
uents. The results with selected analogues 4b–i are
shown in Table 1. When the para-chloro substituent in
4a is moved to the ortho and meta position (4b,c) po-
tency is substantially reduced. Considering that the
ortho-chloro analogue 4b does not show inhibitory
activity up to 100 lM, it is surprising that the 2,6-di-
chloro derivative 4d with an IC50 value of 6.1 lM is as
potent as 4a. Substantial improvement in potency was
achieved with the 3,5-dichloro compound 4e, which
shows an IC50 value against purified STS in the submi-
cromolar range. In the cellular assay system 4e displays
an IC50 value of 1.26 lM, which is only about 3-fold
higher than the inhibitory potency in the cell-free STS
assay. Good agreement between the CHO and purified
enzyme data were also observed for the other chlorophe-
nyl acylsulfonamides tested, that is, 4a and 4d. The high-
est potency in this series was obtained with the fully
halogenated analogue 4f, which features a 4-bromo-
2,5-dichloro-3-thienyl moiety as the aryl element. The
IC50 and Ki values of 4f against purified STS are 26
and 12 nM, respectively. Thus, compound 4f binds
much better to the target and reaches a comparable
IC50 relative to the standard irreversible inhibitor
EMATE. This is remarkable because acylsulfonamides
4 were proven to be reversible inhibitors of STS (data
not shown). In STS-overexpressing CHO cells, 4f is also
the most potent inhibitor out of this series with an IC50
value of 270 nM, exceeding the cellular activity of all
representatives of the original sulfonylurea lead class 1.7
To assess the effect of test compounds on the activity of
STS in intact cells, an assay using recombinant CHO
cells and 4-MUS as substrate (0.5 mM) was used as pre-
viously described,10 using the assay variant for reversible
inhibitors (using live cells and 4h incubations).
4. Discussion of biological results
Starting from lead compound 1a, we had been able to
enhance the potency of this new STS inhibitor class by
appropriate aryl substitution at the arylsulfonylurea
moiety.7 The present study deals with modification of
the bridged nortropine and the attached phenylacetyl
side chain, particularly motivated by the search for sim-
pler central scaffolds.
Initial attempts in this direction, partly disclosed in the
previous publication,7 had been unsuccessful. Thus, cut-
ting out the bridge in the nortropine element to generate
the corresponding piperidine analogue resulted in loss of
activity. Furthermore, the new derivative 2 featuring the
pivaloyl instead of the phenylacetyl ester in 1a was
found to be inactive (Table 1). When investigating addi-
tional analogues, we discovered that moderate inhibi-
tory activity can be achieved by a concomitant change
to a simpler template (i.e., piperazine in 3b) and to the
t-butoxycarbonyl residue as side chain. Surprisingly,
the corresponding benzyloxycarbonyl piperazine 3a with
a side chain similar to that of 1a was inactive. Further
variation of the central scaffold yielded compound 4a
in which formally one nitrogen atom of the piperazine
scaffold in 3b was replaced by carbon. Although this
compound shows 10-fold less inhibitory potency relative
to the lead 1a against purified STS, the cellular activities
of both compounds are in the same range (Table 1). This
result encouraged us to further investigate the potential
of acylsulfonamides of type 4a as STS inhibitors.
The results obtained with additional analogues 4g–i
(Table 1) demonstrate that STS inhibition can also be
achieved with other aryl substituents in acylsulfon-
amides 4. As seen in the previous sulfonylurea series with
1b,7 the 3,5-diCF3 substitution pattern yields a com-
pound with high inhibitory potency. Acylsulfonamide
analogue 4i is not as active as 1b against purified STS
but is superior to 1b with regard to cellular activity. In