Hydrodehalogenation of Halogenated Aryl Ketones
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 11, 1999 3937
Ta ble 3. Hyd r od eh a logen a tion of
4
-Ch lor op r op iop h en on e 1 u n d er Mu ltip h a se Con d ition s
a
in th e P r esen ce of Differ en t Am in es
products (% by GC)
run
amine
Et2NH
Et3N
n-Bu3N
(PhCH2)3N
n-C8H17NH2
time (min)
2
4
others
1
2
3
4
5
55
45
105
60
83
83
82
83
82
15
15
16
16
15
2
2
2
1
3
55
a
Conditions: T ) 50 °C; Pt/C 5% 0.010 g; amine used in 0.2 M
ration with respect to 1; 0.07 M solution of 1 in isooctane (7 mL);
aqueous phase KOH 1% (4 mL). Data refer to complete substrate
conversion.
F igu r e 4. Multiphase hydrodechlorination of 4-chloropropio-
phenone: selectivity toward 2 at different KOH concentrations
using triethylamine as modifier of the catalyst surface.
reaction, indicating that the observed chemoselectivity
depended specifically on the alkalinity of the aqueous
phase and was therefore not determined simply by
different reaction rates.
This fact, and the effect of the pH on selectivity
discussed earlier, prompted us to investigate the influ-
ence of acidic pH’s on the outcome of the hydrodehalo-
genation reaction of 1 in the presence of A336. Under
phase-transfer catalysis conditions, the catalytic reduc-
tion of aromatic ketones to yield alicyclic ketones and
lower than usual) was used. In this way, the reaction was
slowed and complete consumption of the substrate re-
quired 45-105 min (entries 1-5); in the presence of 1%
KOHaq, the use of different amines allowed the dehalo-
genation to occur with selectivities of 80-83% toward the
ketone 3. Although the reaction was not as chemoselec-
tive as in the case of the onium salts, it followed a trend
similar to the one observed using A336. This behavior
was further confirmed by running the hydrodechlorina-
tion reaction in the presence of triethylamine, with
varying KOHaq concentrations. The results are plotted
in Figure 4. Similar to what was observed previously
alcohols was claimed in the presence of [1,5-HDRhCl]
2
as a homogeneous catalyst and of a buffered aqueous
9
solution. Therefore, a series of reactions was conducted,
(compare Figure 3), the reaction outcome was markedly
with an aqueous phase buffered at pH ) 1.00, 2.00, 5.00,
and 7.00; the experiments were run under the conditions
similar to those used for the reaction performed with pure
dependent upon the pH of the aqueous phase: in par-
ticular, the highest selectivity toward the formation of 3
was obtained with 1% KOHaq. Instead, when the concen-
tration was either reduced or increased the selectivity
dropped, and ketone hydrogenation took over. While, the
lipophilicity of the amine appeared to have no appreciable
effect on directing the chemoselectivity of the reaction:
both hydrophilic diethylamine and hydrophobic triben-
zylamine afforded almost identical yields of 3 and 4 after
water (unbuffered solution) where a combined yield of
5
6
5% was reached for 7 + 8. The results are collected in
Table 2.
As expected, at the pH’s tested, the ketone reduction
became competitive with aromatic ring reduction. Even
though the trend confirmed that lower final pH’s (pH <
1
) favored ring reduction products (compare entries 1-4
5
5 min of reaction (82-83% and 15%: Table 3, entries 1
of Table 2), a selectivity as high as that with pure water
65% combined), toward cyclohexyl ketone 7 and cyclo-
and 5, respectively). Therefore, it seems that the concen-
tration and the interaction of the PT agent with the
supported metal catalyst, rather than its partitioning (or
lipophilicity) between the two phases, are the key factors
which determined the observed reaction pathway.
(
hexyl alcohol 8, was never reached. In no case was 5
observed. It was therefore concluded that, when using
pure water, the gradual decrease of pH during the
progress of the reaction promoted reduction of the aryl
moiety, while protecting the carbonyl function. Therefore,
in this case also, the effect of pH on chemoselectivity
appears to be important.
4
. Mech a n ism of Action of th e P T Agen t. As was
previously mentioned, before addition of the PT agent to
the aqueous-organic system, the carbon-supported metal
catalyst was uniformly distributed as a suspension in
both phases. Instead, once the PT agent was added, the
Pt (or Pd)/C catalyst appeared to become coated by it,
and to settle at the phase boundary at rest; upon stirring
it was completely transferred into the organic phase.
The interactions between the carboxyl and carbonyl
3
. Effect of th e P T Agen t. While onium salts, even
of aliphatic amines, are preferentially soluble in the
aqueous phase, a favorable partitioning of aliphatic
amines into the organic phase should, on the other hand,
be expected under multiphase conditions. Therefore, if
an amine was used, in place of an onium salt, a modifica-
tion of the catalyst surface present in the organic phase
should be expected as well, and a consequent effect on
the chemoselectivity of the reaction should be observable.
To this aim, amines with different solubility properties
in the aqueous and organic phases were chosen: diethyl-,
triethyl-, tributyl-, tribenzyl-, and octylamine were tested
in a 0.2 M ratio with respect to 4-chloropropiophenone
10
groups present on the active carbon surface and the PT
agent (onium salt) formed a lipophilic film on the Pt/C
catalyst, thereby favoring its partitioning into the organic
phase where the reaction takes place, and probably
generating a suitable microenvironment for the reaction.
Under basic conditions, the first step in Scheme 2 takes
place in the aqueous phase and gives the formation of
carboxylate anions on the surface of the carbon support
1
. Table 3 reports the results. Since under the usual
+
of the Pt catalyst. In the second step, exchange of K with
conditions conversion of 1 was complete after 17 min, in
order to follow with higher accuracy any variations of the
reaction outcome, a lower mol % of Pt catalyst (5 times
+
the cation (Q ) of the onium salt (or with the ammonium
+
nitrogen, HNR
3
, in the case of the amine) makes the
catalyst surface lipophilic. The supported catalyst is then
(9) J anuszklewicz, K. R.; Alper, H. Organometallics 1983, 2, 1055.
(10) Swiatkowskj, A.; Wieczorek, M. Chem. Anal. 1984, 25, 565.